Massive Spanner
The Football Wrench
30m Euros at that time was 18m pounds at that time because the Euro was weak.
True.
Goodness knows I had to live in a Eurozone throughout that time!
30m Euros at that time was 18m pounds at that time because the Euro was weak.
You actually believe that story?!?
Isnt it a bit more "The United Way" to identify the next 16-19 year old wonderkid, bring him here and develop him into something amazing, all for a relatively inexpensive < £20m? Rather than trying to re-live the past and spending an absolute fortune in the process?
No. But I think he will move on.
He is an all-timer, who will be 28.5 years old when he joins us. He left us once as he didn't think we, Manchester United, could fulfill his ambitions and he needed to go to Spain to take his career to the next level.
As for the commercial aspect, I'll quote me post from the last page:
For the most part yes, but there will be exceptions - especially with Ronaldo. Fergie clearly wants him back.
No. But I think he will move on.
Fergie clearly wants him back.
How exactly is it clear? I am curious.
If he does and it's for £55M, then you'de have to be mad to turn him down.
Why does anyone care about the money, we sometimes talk as if it's coming out of our piggy banks. The club haven't spent irresponsibly before so if they decide to wax £60million on him who cares.
It's not as simplistic as that though. Even if Nike say increase our contract by 3 million a year and it's a 6/7/8 year contract. it will be worth near to 20 million there. And surely 1/2 other sponsors might be attracted ?
We've signed 3 2/3 year deals in japan already since Kagawa signed. Even if it is worth on average 750k per year that's like 7 million from those deals plus 2 tour games which are already sponsored in Japan.
We don't handle image rights like in Madrid either, so he can earn more money from that.
Not that this is happening, mind you. They have elections due in the summer too and won't let him go cut price.
Why does anyone care about the money, we sometimes talk as if it's coming out of our piggy banks. The club haven't spent irresponsibly before so if they decide to wax £60million on him who cares.
Because fans like to idiotically pretend as if they have a say in how the club spends its money.
Why does anyone care about the money, we sometimes talk as if it's coming out of our piggy banks. The club haven't spent irresponsibly before so if they decide to wax £60million on him who cares.
Because fans like to idiotically pretend as if they have a say in how the club spends its money.
Why does anyone care about the money, we sometimes talk as if it's coming out of our piggy banks. The club haven't spent irresponsibly before so if they decide to wax £60million on him who cares.
He'd improve any team in the world, so yeah, I'd love to have him back. But if we're going to start spunking massive money like that I'd prefer to see us buy a top midfielder and sort that for the foreseeable future.
Just go over his quotes since Ronnie has left.
(Speaking personally) its more a case of speculating about what the club will decide to do. As you said, if the club made the decision to spend £60m on him I wouldnt be coming out in protest, and I cant imagine many others would either. If SAF decides not to spend the money, I imagine its the same thing, people would accept SAF's judgement. Until we know, we are just debating whether we think it would be worth it or not.
I don't actually him returning is on the cards, actually I think you're all in the realms of fantasy.
BUT, when you say would it be worth it. Well it's not costing us, it's not my money that's paying for him, so why turn down the option based on cost. We the fans can only benefit from him signing.
I would also do this. I'd prefer a Wilshere (muppet mode) to Ronaldo at £55m.
I don't actually him returning is on the cards, actually I think you're all in the realms of fantasy.
BUT, when you say would it be worth it. Well it's not costing us, it's not my money that's paying for him, so why turn down the option based on cost. We the fans can only benefit from him signing.
Is anyone here actually saying that?
I would also do this. I'd prefer a Wilshere (muppet mode) to Ronaldo at £55m.
This.
There's an obsession with some people on the age to play accountant regarding every, the way I see it is if the club and manager are willing to pay it then it's fine.
No, not really. As a fan I'd rather we use that money elsewhere. Like.. the midfield.
Its a commonly accepted practice. Whenever a price is quoted, its immediately interpreted by fans as a good or bad deal relative to the perceived market.
How do you know it's an either or scenario?
.
Contrary to what Raoul said, to me it seems pretty clear that this is the sort of transfer only a fan or a club run by a billionaire would consider. For someone like SAF, who is always looking for "value in the market" and is likely to look at this with a completely impassive eye, it is a complete non-starter. He would have to be a lot cheaper than £55m.
You think they are chumps working at Nike? These guys are smarter than you think and are bereft of any emotions like you and I. You think they'll give us extra money for an 8 year contract based on Ronaldo, when they know that he doesn't have that long left at the top of the game?
Kagawa is a different animal, as his signing opens new avenues for us in a market where he comes from. A huge, relatively untapped market.
How is him earning money will benefit us?
I suspect Pompey fans would disagree. Or Leeds. Etc. etc.
That's not the situation we're in, obviously, but as fans we're entitled to have our say on what we think we need. And a signing like this would impact everything else, so of course it's going to be discussed.