Antisocial
Has a Sony home cinema
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,792
Where would you play Ronnie ffs?
Back-up to Valencia? Or is he ready to start at right-back ahead of Rafael?
Where would you play Ronnie ffs?
You can, and you do. Why paper over the cracks when you can actually repair them by spending in the apt areas?You don't turn a 30 year Ronaldo down, he is. Once in a lifetime player and will do enough to paper over most cracks!
Haha, funny quip there mate, I certainly didn't know that!I dunno what planet you're from but on Earth it's possible to sign more than 1 player per transfer window. Basically we could sign Ronaldo and still bring in defenders and midfielders for our squad.
Also your notion of "Balance" is pretty funny, we need quality wingers just as much as any position right now, Ronaldo would basically replace Valencia and Young, so how's that for squad balance..
Saying all this, do we really think Madrid will even entertain the notion of selling him? haha. He has 4 years left on his contract and is no longer holding the cards. Maybe £50million wouldn't be enough even for a 29 year old, I think we'd have to probably break the world transfer record to sign him.
I'd still do it mind.
Yeah, with fans apparently dissatisfied with Perez this summer I'm not sure he could risk selling Ronnie.Saying all this, do we really think Madrid will even entertain the notion of selling him? haha. He has 4 years left on his contract and is no longer holding the cards. Maybe £50million wouldn't be enough even for a 29 year old, I think we'd have to probably break the world transfer record to sign him.
I'd still do it mind.
Back-up to Valencia? Or is he ready to start at right-back ahead of Rafael?
You can, and you do. Why paper over the cracks when you can actually repair them by spending in the apt areas?
Haha, funny quip there mate, I certainly didn't know that!
Ronaldo wouldn't be replacing Valencia and Young, as neither have played as wingers this season. Both are clearly seen as wingbacks. Those who were seen as wingers - Zaha and Nani - were discarded. Will Ronaldo be playing wingback? Also, classifying Ronaldo as a winger is a very liberal use of the term. He's far more of a left inside forward who will need a player to do an extra shift defensively to cover him as he does none of that himself. Why are you so aggressive in your reply?
If we are to play the diamond - we don't need another winger. We have di Maria and Januzaj to provide width, and could make another signing such as Depay to be an option as a wide player. If we are to sign Ronaldo, it will most definitely mean that two of Rooney, Mata, van Persie and Falcao (should he stay) will have to be discarded. What do we do with them?
Ronaldo makes as many problems as he solves, and I can understand the sentimentality in bringing back such a great player, but I just personally wouldn't want it to happen.
How can you say that Ronaldo would make as many problems as he'd solve with a straight face? Baffling nonsense.You can, and you do. Why paper over the cracks when you can actually repair them by spending in the apt areas?
Haha, funny quip there mate, I certainly didn't know that!
Ronaldo wouldn't be replacing Valencia and Young, as neither have played as wingers this season. Both are clearly seen as wingbacks. Those who were seen as wingers - Zaha and Nani - were discarded. Will Ronaldo be playing wingback? Also, classifying Ronaldo as a winger is a very liberal use of the term. He's far more of a left inside forward who will need a player to do an extra shift defensively to cover him as he does none of that himself. Why are you so aggressive in your reply?
If we are to play the diamond - we don't need another winger. We have di Maria and Januzaj to provide width, and could make another signing such as Depay to be an option as a wide player. If we are to sign Ronaldo, it will most definitely mean that two of Rooney, Mata, van Persie and Falcao (should he stay) will have to be discarded. What do we do with them?
Ronaldo makes as many problems as he solves, and I can understand the sentimentality in bringing back such a great player, but I just personally wouldn't want it to happen.
I understand he's held in super, super high regards here but let's be serious. The amount of goals he'll get is great, but he'll just put further pressure on us defensively. Simple as that.How can you say that Ronaldo would make as many problems as he'd solve with a straight face? Baffling nonsense.
I understand he's held in super, super high regards here but let's be serious. The amount of goals he'll get is great, but he'll just put further pressure on us defensively. Simple as that.
Okay.That makes no sense.
Not sure if serious...we didnt play with orthodox wingers yesterday and Ronnie isnt really a winger anymore. If he does come it will be upfront.
Okay.
I understand he's held in super, super high regards here but let's be serious. The amount of goals he'll get is great, but he'll just put further pressure on us defensively. Simple as that.
Because we already have three players who will be our top goalscorers for the next three years. Alongside one who has 8 in his last 10. We don't need his goalscoring accolades, we need defensive improvements.It doesn't though.
Using his lack of defensive help to suggest not buying him when he'd probably be top scorer for at least the next few years is a bit ridiculous.
it will most definitely mean that two of Rooney, Mata, van Persie and Falcao (should he stay) will have to be discarded. What do we do with them?
I agree there, but we are still very far away from a defence good enough to compensate.Guesstimate that Ronaldo is the cause of 5 goals from not back tracking, but scores 50. There's no much pressure on the defense if we're winning 1-0 and Ronaldo bangs in a further 2-3 goals.
We just dump our captain? Okay.We get rid of Rooney and Van Persie. Pretty much a no brainer.
We just dump our captain? Okay.
Because we already have three players who will be our top goalscorers for the next three years. Alongside one who has 8 in his last 10. We don't need his goalscoring accolades, we need defensive improvements.
Guesstimate that Ronaldo is the cause of 5 goals from not back tracking, but scores 50. There's no much pressure on the defense if we're winning 1-0 and Ronaldo bangs in a further 2-3 goals.
I agree there, but we are still very far away from a defence good enough to compensate.
I guess so. I don't think Strootman - Herrera as a pivot will be strong enough defensively. Whilst both are aggressive and tough tacklers, both love to get forward and involved in attacks. I think we'd need a three man midfield; an anchor with those infront to accomodate Ronaldo. But I guess we'll have to wait and see.We've plenty of time between now and next September to strengthen the further positions we need to challenge. I can honestly see us signing a world class CB and possibly Strootman between now and then which would leave plenty of money left to get Ronaldo.
Using Hummels as an example.
------De Gea
Rafa-Hummels-Rojo-Shaw
-----Blind/Strootman---Herrera
Di Maria-Mata/Rooney-Ronaldo
--------Falcao/RVP
Great depth not to include Smalling, Jones for CB cover.
I agree there, but we are still very far away from a defence good enough to compensate.
If we could get 9 decent years out of Giggs after he turned 30, I'm sure we could get a few out of Ronnie.
You get the sense that, like Giggs, he's the consummate professional athlete, and will do the work needed to keep his body in peak physical condition.
If he can stay clear of injuries, I could honestly see him lasting as long as Giggsy. How his role may change in those hypothetical 9 years I think is the really interesting question.
A huge amount will go on Ronaldo, though. Will we put the same amount on a CB?So your assumption is that if we sign Ronaldo next summer, that we do not do anything to improve elsewhere.
This place is going to be unbearable on the subject of Ronaldo now.
We just dump our captain? Okay.
Unless Falcao is incredible this season, I wouldn't sign him if we're to get Ronaldo. Getting Ronaldo essentially forces us to play him and Di Maria wide and for balance I think we'd be better off playing a single striker up front.