Brwned
Have you ever been in love before?
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2008
- Messages
- 50,946
By that logic, Muller could be used as a convenient straw man to denigrate just about every great player. Example - Muller scored about 500 more goals than Maradona, averaged nearly a goal a game over his career, won the WC just as Maradona did, but also won three Champions Leagues, four Bundesliga titles and actually spent most of his career at a big club rather than bouncing around various leagues. In what way then is Maradona a greater player than Muller ? Sounds a bit ridiculous doesn't it.
That logic is an extrapolation of your argument, is it not? You're the one talking about goals records as being a key factor which puts Ronaldo up there alongside Maradona and Pelé. I don't think goals records count for much without context - the quality of opposition (e.g. van Basten scored a lot less at Milan than Ronaldo at Madrid, but if you adjust for the relative defensive strength of the leagues it comes out pretty even), the trophies it contributed to, the consistency of scoring across multiple platforms (national, intercontinental, international) etc. Goal records on their own are a small part of it. Maradona, Cruyff, Pelé and the rest did this.
The Muller-Ronaldo comparison works because his contribution in big games is the same as Muller's - goals, and the odd "key pass". He doesn't control games, he doesn't change the flow of the game single-handedly when his team is up against it. Quite simply he doesn't elevate the performance of his team-mates and you can count the number of big games he has won on his own. I doubt you can find one big game of Ronaldo's that compares to Best in the '68 final. Even with us, his own attempt to be the hero in '09 just led to him being selfish and wasteful while Messi still managed to influence the game more despite hardly making a selfish move all game.