Berbasbullet
Too Boring For A Funny Tagline
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 21,850
SUEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
SUEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
I lost 16 million in wages... yaay?It'd just motivate him to his best game in years. 'I'm out of United? YAY...it worked!'
I lost 16 million in wages... yaay?
Bravo!SUEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
It should be the latter.So sue him for the wages? Or he's already not getting the £16m wages and is being sued on top
I assume he's 'admired' like a school bully, Homelander or Putin is.I thought that he said the coach but maybe I imagined it. And yes he clearly didn't regret doing it and he thinks that he was actually justified. How do you deal with that as a manager, especially when it's a player that is idolized in the dressing room?
he's clearly not wanted anymore
Yep. Big picture.I lost 16 million in wages... yaay?
I assume he's 'admired' like a school bully, Homelander or Putin is.
It takes a big personality to stand up to Ronaldo in the football world. You only have to look at how he's clapped back at Rooney who dares say a bad word about him.
I think the squad will personally feel a sigh of relief if he's really gone.
It wasn’t even on tv properly.I can't imagine many top clubs desperate to sign a 37 year old in horrendous form who has come out and basically announced he demands to start every single game and if he doesn't he'll go on TV and slag you off.
In our squad he may have that influence but I don't think people like Rooney, Neville and co really give a shit. They probably go soft on him because they were team mates and he often still sounds like a child. Either could go in hard if they wanted. He's not really an intimidating personality at all. Just a delusional one.I assume he's 'admired' like a school bully, Homelander or Putin is.
It takes a big personality to stand up to Ronaldo in the football world. You only have to look at how he's clapped back at Rooney who dares say a bad word about him.
I think the squad will personally feel a sigh of relief if he's really gone.
Gotta pay for a new striker somehow.It should be the latter.
There is surely grounds to ripping up his contract and being done with him. I wouldn't even worry about him joining a rival team, such is the level of his regression.
Big picture is that we are getting of the cnutYep. Big picture.
Jordan v Morgan
Jordan v Morgan
from the outside, until you get to meet him that is. All people ever talk about is how driven he is.I think that the admiration is genuine. We are talking about one of the greatest player of all time, he has won nearly every major trophies and individual awards.
From a legal perspective, what are the actual grounds for sacking him?
Nah, we shouldn't do anything like that. We have no quarrel with Portugal, irrespective of Ronaldo's shit timing.Hopefully it happens just before Portugal play.
Lets be honest, Ronaldo is not going to go down easily.
No chance he accepts a contract termination without being paid his contract out. He will want his money, from the interview, you could tell he loves his money.
Its up to United to make sure he does not get paid, if he wants to be paid, keep him and do not let him at Carrington. Make him train alone for 6 months and dont let him just go on holiday either.
I want to see him suffer if he does not accept a contract termination.
it would be perfect if we sued him and bought a replacement striker in with it
From a legal perspective, what are the actual grounds for sacking him?
All top-flight players sign a Premier League employment contract with their clubs.
Under that agreement, they are obliged to “comply with and act in accordance with all lawful instructions of any authorised official of the club” and are not allowed to “write or say anything which is likely to bring the club… into disrepute… or cause damage to the club”.
United would have to establish the extent to which Ronaldo is in breach of his contract through his comments to determine what outcomes are possible.
Jordan v Morgan
Geez, he really did yake him to the cleaners, and that was just about the interviewing style by drawing parallels to Piers' castigation of Oprah's interview with Markle.
Piers gets all tied up in knots in defending why he didn't challenge anything - "Ronaldo was responding to what was in the press to set the record straight", well so was Meghan Markle!
So pleased I pointedly refused to watch the interview myself, but I must credit Piers, he played a blinder by releasing the absolute highlights of the convo before the actual thing, which appears to have little else of substance.
Jordan v Morgan
From a legal perspective, what are the actual grounds for sacking him?
He admitted to refusing to come on.From a legal perspective, what are the actual grounds for sacking him?
I doubt the club is out there talking about legal issues.
Of course he won't play for us again. I'm just hoping we can get out of not having to pay him off or paying him very little. Just want it to end, and hopefully without is having to sue.