AndySmith1990
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2021
- Messages
- 7,273
Offering him to every team for the second time in case they forgot he was available.
Desperation. feck knows what they will resort to as we get nearer to the window closing
Offering him to every team for the second time in case they forgot he was available.
Narcissists will always blame everyone but themselvesThe Duncan Castles report says he blames us for ruining his reputation.
Keep going the same way, your future here is bright.It was a joke referring the movie. You probably wasn’t born when it was released though….
Keep going the same way, your future here is bright.
It’s been fine here until I met your roommate. I usually talk football and don’t resort to childish name calling of United legends. That’s was of course, until I met you.
One spearheads the attack for a team that regularly reaches the semi finals of the CL, and the other literally has some ownership of the other club whilst being one of the most exciting talents in world football and both are in the early early 20s. There's every chance they break Ronaldo's record.
Offering him to every team for the second time in case they forgot he was available.
Based on what?True, but the odds of maintaining the pace they are on now is slim to none.
Apparently Rangnick advised Tuchel against signing him
Based on what?
Based on masturbating to Cristiano achivements in hope no one ever better them.
They play for the 2 richest clubs in the world, 2 of the best teams. There's every chance their teams will start making deep runs every seasonTrue, but the odds of maintaining the pace they are on now is slim to none.
Based on what?
Ronaldo played for 9 years for a team that sought to maximise his output. In a similar vein, both Haaland and Mbappe will have that role at their respective clubs for at least the next 5-7 years. There’s every chance that both these players could be 27/28 years old and have 80+ CL goals. If they get to that position, and they remain injury free, I can see them ending up with 150ish. Haaland especially can adapt his game and end up somewhere like Bayern and have a similar output to Lewadowski.Based on the fact that only Messi and Ronaldo have been able to generate high amounts of goals over a protracted period of time. They are once in a lifetime players. The others are top players of their respective generations and will likely never get to anywhere near goat status.
For comparison, Ruud had two very good early years in the CL where he scored 24 goals. And yet he only finished on 62 despite spending most of his career at Man United and Real Madrid. That is probably closer to where Haaland and Mbappe will wind up because virtually every player spare Ronaldo and Messi have demonstrated they are unable to produce goals for a decade or more, which is what it would take to catch Ronaldo.
They play for the 2 richest clubs in the world, 2 of the best teams. There's every chance their teams will start making deep runs every season
Your problem is you put far too much stock in stats. Ronaldo gets amazing stats but he generally makes his teams worse and needs his team mates to sacrifice their entire game to do it. Then there is the fact that loads of his goals come against minnows, or are meaningless stat padding anyway (same with Messi but difference is Messi can actually dictate a game and isn't just a goalscorer). He's scored tons of goals for Juve and United, but did those teams get better? Did it help them or his goal stat reputation? Even at Real Madrid, his tons of goals in the league only led to 2 Liga titles in 9 seasons (dominated by Barca) and if it wasn't for the very flukey three CLs in a row his time there would have been seen as a failure probably, with two leagues and 1 CL to show for 9 seasons. Real Madrid have proved since he left that they can win things without him (admittedly it's not against prime Barca but still) Who is to say a more balanced team not deisgned to feed Ronaldo with 10 chances a game wouldn't have had a better chance against Pep's Barca? Pep generally dominated Ronaldo's teams for two years until Pep took his eye off the ball in 2011-2012.Based on the fact that only Messi and Ronaldo have been able to generate high amounts of goals over a protracted period of time. They are once in a lifetime players. The others are top players of their respective generations and will likely never get to anywhere near goat status.
For comparison, Ruud had two very good early years in the CL where he scored 24 goals. And yet he only finished on 62 despite spending most of his career at Man United and Real Madrid. That is probably closer to where Haaland and Mbappe will wind up because virtually every player spare Ronaldo and Messi have demonstrated they are unable to produce goals for a decade or more, which is what it would take to catch Ronaldo.
Your problem is you put far too much stock in stats. Ronaldo gets amazing stats but he generally makes his teams worse and needs his team mates to sacrifice their entire game to do it. Then there is the fact that loads of his goals come against minnows, or are meaningless stat padding anyway (same with Messi but difference is Messi can actually dictate a game and isn't just a goalscorer). He's scored tons of goals for Juve and United, but did those teams get better? Did it help them or his goal stat reputation? Even at Real Madrid, his tons of goals in the league only led to 2 Liga titles in 9 seasons (dominated by Barca) and if it wasn't for the very flukey three CLs in a row his time there would have been seen as a failure probably, with two leagues and 1 CL to show for 9 seasons. Real Madrid have proved since he left that they can win things without him (admittedly it's not against prime Barca but still) Who is to say a more balanced team not deisgned to feed Ronaldo with 10 chances a game wouldn't have had a better chance against Pep's Barca? Pep generally dominated Ronaldo's teams for two years until Pep took his eye off the ball in 2011-2012.
As Zehner constantly says, this obsession with goal stats is fecking ridiculous. The natrual conclusion from your comments is that Ronaldo is about 15 times the player Iniesta was based on goal proportions, and that the likes of Gerrard, lampard were better than Xavi and Zidane. In fact, feck it, might as well say mario Gomez or Luca Toni were all time greats for scoring loads of goals.
Can you not see how fecking ridiculous and moronic tactically it is to just count up goal stats to the detriment of everything else? Ronaldo scores tons of goals but is he a better technical footballer than Xavi and Iniesta? Did he contribute more to the team outside of goalscoring than they did? Does he feck.
This Americansation stats obsession in modern football is fecking ridiculous. In fact, what is the point of even having goalkeeepers, defenders and midfielders? Just play a three on three forward game and see who scores most goals.
fecking sick to the back teeth of idiots (not saying you are in idiot, but in general) who can't tactically analyse a game so fall back to goal stats. Zehner is spot on, there is so much more to football than the final two contacts before a goal. I am just so sick of inbreds saying shite like 'how can you say he played poorly, he scored'? Like a tap in or finish one minute out of 90 excuses the other 89 minutes of fecking shite general play. I am talking generally here, not just about Ronaldo, but certainly Ronaldo and Bruno Fernandes are the biggest examples of stats and highlights players I can think of.
Nobody is saying he was detrimental to the overall team performance during his prime, only that there are some signs of this being the case now that he's a pure poacher with a dodgy touch and a very low work-rate.There’s no obsession with goals. The only reason they are brought up is because folks tend to brush off the importance of goals (something we’ve sorely lacked in recent years) as a way to move the goal posts in support of their anti-Ronaldo arguments.
As for he makes his teams worse, the hand fun of CLs his teams have won over the years would seem to not line up with this taking point.
I would argue that Juventus Ronaldo onwards absolutely has made teams worse due to his changing role as he has aged.There’s no obsession with goals. The only reason they are brought up is because folks tend to brush off the importance of goals (something we’ve sorely lacked in recent years) as a way to move the goal posts in support of their anti-Ronaldo arguments.
As for he makes his teams worse, the hand fun of CLs his teams have won over the years would seem to not line up with this taking point.
In fact to add to this:There’s no obsession with goals. The only reason they are brought up is because folks tend to brush off the importance of goals (something we’ve sorely lacked in recent years) as a way to move the goal posts in support of their anti-Ronaldo arguments.
As for he makes his teams worse, the hand fun of CLs his teams have won over the years would seem to not line up with this taking point.
I covered thatThere’s no obsession with goals. The only reason they are brought up is because folks tend to brush off the importance of goals (something we’ve sorely lacked in recent years) as a way to move the goal posts in support of their anti-Ronaldo arguments.
As for he makes his teams worse, the hand fun of CLs his teams have won over the years would seem to not line up with this taking point.
In fact to add to this:
15/16 49 1.29 per game
16/17 54 1.42 per game
17/18 68 1.79 per game
18/19 65 1.71 per game
19/20 66 1.74 per game
20/21 73 1.92 per game
21/22 57 1.5 per game
Thats 7 seasons worth here (can go further back but you said recent years).
Based on your comment how would you describe the trend of goals from 15/16 to 20/21 season?
What then happened in 21/22 season? I’m not solely blaming Ronaldo but I also won’t ignore that his very presence takes away from a teams overall ability to attack as it’s a one man poaching show now.
Ronaldo is absolutely a factor in our teams attack being worse last season.
The difference between Cristiano, Messi and someone like Lewandowski is that Real Madrid and Barcelona made deep runs for most of their careers there. Lewandowski has scored 85 CL goals in the last 10 seasons. He has played at least 10 games 6 times. In 3 of those 6 seasons he hit double digits(and 9 in another). For a comparison, Cristiano hit double digit appereances 11 times, scoring in double digits in 7. Messi, 8, 5(once with 9 gp)Based on the fact that only Messi and Ronaldo have been able to generate high amounts of goals over a protracted period of time. They are once in a lifetime players. The others are top players of their respective generations and will likely never get to anywhere near goat status.
For comparison, Ruud had two very good early years in the CL where he scored 24 goals. And yet he only finished on 62 despite spending most of his career at Man United and Real Madrid. That is probably closer to where Haaland and Mbappe will wind up because virtually every player spare Ronaldo and Messi have demonstrated they are unable to produce goals for a decade or more, which is what it would take to catch Ronaldo.
He was a pure poacher with a dodgy touch and very low work rate when Madrid won 3 CL in a rowNobody is saying he was detrimental to the overall team performance during his prime, only that there are some signs of this being the case now that he's a pure poacher with a dodgy touch and a very low work-rate.
His touch was way, way better than it is now.He was a pure poacher with a dodgy touch and very low work rate when Madrid won 3 CL in a row
Nah, not reallyHis touch was way, way better than it is now.
I hope you know that football is more than goals.Based on the fact that only Messi and Ronaldo have been able to generate high amounts of goals over a protracted period of time. They are once in a lifetime players. The others are top players of their respective generations and will likely never get to anywhere near goat status.
For comparison, Ruud had two very good early years in the CL where he scored 24 goals. And yet he only finished on 62 despite spending most of his career at Man United and Real Madrid. That is probably closer to where Haaland and Mbappe will wind up because virtually every player spare Ronaldo and Messi have demonstrated they are unable to produce goals for a decade or more, which is what it would take to catch Ronaldo.
Of course not but you can identify when a player is having a negative overall impact and I strongly believe Ronaldo has done that.As you said, you can’t blame one player for terrible team performances in a year when the entire club were in free fall with two terrible managers, a toxic dressing room and half a squad of unmotivated dead wood. You have to look at the totality of the situation instead of building a hypothesis around just one player.
.
See the Ruud example. Henry also played most of his career for Juventus, peak Arsenal, and Barcelona and only finished on 59. Players do get injured and lose form over time, which is what has separated Messi and Ronaldo from the others. They both somehow miraculously managed to avoid injury while knocking in an unprecedented amount of goals over a protracted period of time.
What are you talking about? Have you seen ronaldo play post Real Madrid, especially the last two seasons, his finishing is abysmal, he wastes so many chances himself, stops many attacks. Sure there is a decent involvmement here and there but too littel in between and you absolutely expect to have a palyer get a goal involvement as the main man in United team, but he's just past it.
Funnily enough he's not even as useful as Danny Welbeck now. Not worth putting on even for 15 minutes because he refuses to run or simply can't because he's too old, we have seen that today and we have seen that many times before. He basicially just loses the ball while we play with 10 men with and without the ball with him.
Some of his fanboys will keepcoming without even watching any of those games claiming that he's still useful. No he's absolutely finished and sadly there is a really bad situation at United with strikers but he will nto solv that. 18 year old Garnacho isbetter than him and hopefully we will start giving him chances than this guy who just thinks he still has it and is not even willing to break the sweat for the starters..
Your problem is you put far too much stock in stats. Ronaldo gets amazing stats but he generally makes his teams worse and needs his team mates to sacrifice their entire game to do it. Then there is the fact that loads of his goals come against minnows, or are meaningless stat padding anyway (same with Messi but difference is Messi can actually dictate a game and isn't just a goalscorer). He's scored tons of goals for Juve and United, but did those teams get better? Did it help them or his goal stat reputation? Even at Real Madrid, his tons of goals in the league only led to 2 Liga titles in 9 seasons (dominated by Barca) and if it wasn't for the very flukey three CLs in a row his time there would have been seen as a failure probably, with two leagues and 1 CL to show for 9 seasons. Real Madrid have proved since he left that they can win things without him (admittedly it's not against prime Barca but still) Who is to say a more balanced team not deisgned to feed Ronaldo with 10 chances a game wouldn't have had a better chance against Pep's Barca? Pep generally dominated Ronaldo's teams for two years until Pep took his eye off the ball in 2011-2012.
As Zehner constantly says, this obsession with goal stats is fecking ridiculous. The natrual conclusion from your comments is that Ronaldo is about 15 times the player Iniesta was based on goal proportions, and that the likes of Gerrard, lampard were better than Xavi and Zidane. In fact, feck it, might as well say mario Gomez or Luca Toni were all time greats for scoring loads of goals.
Can you not see how fecking ridiculous and moronic tactically it is to just count up goal stats to the detriment of everything else? Ronaldo scores tons of goals but is he a better technical footballer than Xavi and Iniesta? Did he contribute more to the team outside of goalscoring than they did? Does he feck. There are many ways to play and many ways to win a game, a hell of a lot of work goes into getting Ronaldo his goals, and most of the time the hardest work is done by his team mates, not him. But he's the one who gets the statistical credit so superficial fans can't see past that. I bet if you looked through all of Messi and Ronaldo's hundreds of goals, Messi's goals would be of much better quality and a higher degree of difficulty, in general. Ronaldo scores so many basic, scrappy goals it is unreal.
This Americansation stats obsession in modern football is fecking ridiculous. Have you never heard of qualitative data ie the eye test? It's what proper football fans used to do before everyone was obsessed with misleading stats. In fact, what is the point of even watching football? Might as well count up goal stats on wikpieda. Why? even have goalkeeepers, defenders and midfielders? Just play a three on three forward game and see who scores most goals.
fecking sick to the back teeth of idiots (not saying you are in idiot, but in general) who can't tactically analyse a game so fall back to goal stats. Zehner is spot on, there is so much more to football than the final two contacts before a goal. I am just so sick of inbreds saying shite like 'how can you say he played poorly, he scored'? Like a tap in or finish one minute out of 90 excuses the other 89 minutes of fecking shite general play. I am talking generally here, not just about Ronaldo, but certainly Ronaldo and Bruno Fernandes are the biggest examples of stats and highlights players I can think of.
Like I said in my lengthy posts a few pages back where I talked about Ronaldo's personality and celebrity idol culture in general - Ronaldo fanboys are the absolute worst. They're a weird creepy insane cult who twist everything to make him seem like some sort of God. See shite like 'The CR7 Timeline' (cringe). Why do people wank over some dickhead celebrity whose only redeeming feature in life is being able to put a ball in a net a lot? He's an absolute cnut of a guy and should be reviled the world over, not be popular. Blows my mind. He wouldn't piss on any of you if you were on fire ffs, stop rimming him.
Just a heads up. I am 40 and been following and playing football all of my life. I have been reading this forum for almost 15 years. I have seen some of you condescend 'newbies' in the past while I have lurked, which makes me cringe, because how new someone is to a football forum has no relevance on how good a poster they are. There are loads of clueless posters on here and, frankly, I don't think your newbie system works, so I would appreciate no snarky comments about me being new from the usual cliquey suspects (not that I want to to keep posting anyway, i will say what I want to say and that will be it, assuming my post is allowed).
I hate Man United and this clown Ronaldo (probably Ronaldo more so). I acknowledge that he has been a top player but, honestly, I don't think he comes anywhere close to Messi, Maradona, Pele, Cruyff etc and he at best limps into the top ten of all time. I think his reputation is vastly out of proportion to his actual ability.The reasons I think he is overrated have mostly been covered by the poster Zehner on here ie the overreliance on goal stats at the expense of general contribution, which is also a feature of his return to your club because I agree with those who say that his goalscoring is far outweighed by the fact his team mates get worse with him in the team. Also the Americanisation of football with emphasis on stats, physique and celebrity. Ronaldo's been the same at every club to be honest, where he has needed an entire team set up for him to get him his out of context, inflated goal stats. Other reasons are I just much prefer players who are more technical than athletic, and who are more possession type players and great in tight spaces, whereas he's more of a pace and power merchant (which is why he is struggling so much now he's lost both). Admittedly in terms of stature and style of play I am much more like Messi or Maradona and can identify better with them (at my infinitely lower level of football, obviously) so it's natural I would prefer them to a tall, athletic counter-attack player like Ronaldo .Like I say I could write an essay on why I think he's overrated, but that isn't what I want to say.
There are two things I want to talk about: first, Ronaldo himself and his attitude and personality, and second, the celebrity culture which surrounds him and pervades this forum (the latter which I will cover in the next post).
On Ronaldo himself, it is quite obvious that he is a complete and utter cnut of a guy. First of all the rape allegations (which given what a creepy weirdo he appears to be you can imagine being very true). Some guys are wrongly accused but I don't believe he has been. He comes across as exactly the type of guy who think he is entitled to do anything he wants and is untouchable, and the same will have been true back when these incidents occurred (because there has been more than one allegation) as he has always believed himself above others. He's just so rich and powerful that I believe he got away with it, whereas less rich and powerful footballers rightly did not.
I think the thing about Ronaldo is there are a lot of myths surrouding his personality, and a lot of things people use to try to defend him. First, the charity work. Anyone with half a brain knows that celebrities do charity work for the PR for the most part, so it's obvious that guys like he and Beckham increase their popularity through PR and perversely become richer through their charity work as more (gullible) people start to follow them. They're essentially using charity work as an investment, which is disgusting. Not all celebrities are like this, but most are. Ronaldo especially is micro managed through his 'brand', with his pathetic and cringeworthy CR7 nickname and Siiiuu celebration being identifiable symbols to help recognise the guy. People peddle his brand when they call him by that name or imitate his celebration, and do other things. So that's one myth.
Second, we have the idea that Ronaldo is 'the hardest worker in football'. He probably does work hard, but I think there will be plenty of harder workers, they're just not as famous as him and, tied to the above, don't have his visibility or PR machine. This myth seems to come from his body (which is just the plastic gimp's vanity, to be quite frank). It is quite clear that he works out so his body looks good, and most of his training is centred on his fitness. He has done very little in the last 10 years to improve his frankly putrid pressing, hold up play, first touch, passing and dribbling (he was always a kick and run dribbler, not a proper weaving dribbler, when he did try to be the latter he was a kid and did stupid tricks all the time as you all know). If he was genuinely a hard worker he'd work harder on his actual ball work, but instead he develops his body which is pointless beause he is weak and slow as piss these days. I also doubt the 'professionalism' bollocks given how he has behaved this summer and his general attitude to others.
There also seems to be a subset of people who think that because team-mates don't speak out about him or other players that they must be popular (we seen this with the laughable defenders of that other overrated tosser, Pogba). Team-mates praise each other all the time, and rarely say anything bad about each other, ironically beause they are being professional. I wouldn't be surprised if loads of his ex-Real Madrid and Juventus and current United team-mates cannot stand him. Truthfully it is pretty obvios Ten Hag has zero time for the guy. He refused to attend when Modric (or Messi) won the Ballon 'dor (which, as an aside is a pointless award and glorified popularity contest and shows how petty he is that he cares so much about it). I am convinced for example that Benzema had a dig at him with his 'some players play poorly for 90 minutes then get named Man of the Match when they score the winner late on, I don't want to be that type of player' comment. Real Madrid have done far better without him than he has without them since he left, so I am sure they feel that they got too little credit, and he got too much because of the stats obsessives pervading modern football. Likewise his Juventus team-mates were probably fed up of the tactic 'feed Ronaldo with 10 chances a game and he will score one or two'.
Then there's the guy's so called 'self-belief'. Personally, I am not sure he is that confident. I think a lot of his arrogance is a front for rampant insecurity. He remembers how ugly he used to be pre dental work and plastic surgery (I still think he's ugly now and so do many women, but that's not the point) so he talks himself up as if he's better looking than guys like Brad Pitt and Henry Cavill, guys who in any realistic opinion are miles better looking than he is. The qualities he thinks he has excuse his actions in his eyes. For example, he said people hated him cos he was rich, handsome and successful, but he overlooks that there have been plenty of footballers who have been rich, successful and handsome (plenty much more handsome than him too) who aren't hated. For example guys like Totti, Pirlo, Cannavaro. There's been loads of good looking, talented, rich footballers who people have respect for so maybe he should realise it's probably just the fact he's a cnut. He is surrounded by sycophantic yes men, which contributes to his delusion and detachment from reality. Another example of this is thinking clubs would be lining up for 'the great Ronaldo' this summer, now he will be shocked that no fecker wants him. Shows he is really deluded.
On the football side of his 'arrogance', I think deep down he knows he is nowhere near as good a Messi (or myriad other players from history to be truthful) so he constantly overcompensates, talking himself up and calling himself the king etc. He is stuck in limbo between arrogance and insecurity, like any narcissist. Like they say the self-proclaimed best is far from the best. Fact is in the old Messi debate with him (which I know is very very boring but relevant to his psyche) the vast majority of football professionals think Messi is the much superior player, that is just the general consensus (and the truth) so he will just have to deal with it. Ultimately Messi offers far more than just goalscoring and he doesn't, he knows the only way to keep up with Messi in shallow people's eyes is to score more goals than him, which is why he's obsessed with his goal stats.
Sorry for any typos, I didn't proof read.
Quoted for the truth. Even in his late Madrid days you can see that his ball control wasn’t there anymore. Could still dribble back then, just not on an elite rateHe was a pure poacher with a dodgy touch and very low work rate when Madrid won 3 CL in a row