Dhoni. Ridiculous. Rest of the middle to lower order needs shooting.
None of them are proven outside India in test matches (Kohli is the only one who's done anything of note outside India in tests).
Raina is a proven failure, Pujara looked completely out of his depth the last time we toured South Africa.
I would say Pujara's 60 ball 10 in SA last time is a better innings than anything Kohli has played outside India.
Pakistan's ODI series with WI being investigated for fixing.
I don't rate Shikhar Dhawan, I think he's been extremely lucky so far and he'll go out of the team soon.
I think he's a good player, but been extremely lucky, yes.
Rohit's getting a lot of unfair stick. I haven't seen a single ball of this series but he was very, very good in the champions trophy and then 3 bad scores adn people clamouring to drop him and talk of how he never performs.
Would like to see what Dhawan does against England, SA in test cricket before passing judgment on him.
At the moment, our best ODI top 7 is Rohit, Dhawan, Kohli, Pujara, Raina, Dhoni, Jadeja, but for some reason, Pujara's being tried up top, where we don't have vacancies.
Strange decision, IMO.
I strongly disagree with that. At 3 and 4, we need players who can score hundreds. Yuvraj's not that player anymore.
Rohit Sharma is also more talented than Pujara and maybe even as good as Kohli. But he has an average of 30 in more than 100 games and been given more chances than most young Indian batsmen combined so if people are calling for him to be dropped after three poor scores against Zimbabwe then I am with them. He's at the stage where he must consistently deliver or be dropped. How many 100's did he score in the CT and then in WI? None is your answer because he comes up with ridiculous shots to get him out after getting himself in. Dhawan in less than 20 games has more hundreds than Sharma and that speaks volumes.
oh and I agree. Pujara should concentrate on tests. We have more than enough players for the ODI's. Don't want him to damage his knees
Recent form is more an indicator of how a player should be judged. 3 matches is not an extended enough period of time to drop a player who has made 480 runs in 12 innings before that, considering he was the 2nd best batsman in the champions trophy and the best batsman in WI -- all this in context of opening against the 2 new balls. You realize his average would still be hovering near 30s even if he'd converted a couple of his 70s into 100s?
Lets not dress up things here. He played well in WI but still managed to bottle it on more than one occasion after getting a start, the final being a good example. Getting to 100's is not just about improving his average, it's about carrying on once you get in and cashing it in and this is something he has consistently failed to do. Dhawan hasn't got as many starts as Sharma did but when he did get a start he made it count. Kohli is another one in similar vein and has 15 () 100's in similar amount of games.
Fact is Rohit has got more chances than he deserved and it's about time he backed up the trust shown in him by multiple selection committees.
What did Sachin average after 100 ODI's? Sharma has enough talent and I think the captaincy stint he had in the IPL will help him mature and this stint opening will help too.
More than Rohit I should think although Sachin batted well down the order then and couldn't have had more than 2 or 3 hundreds. Stupid comparing them though
Rohit played brilliantly in difficult conditions in West Indies. He's a better player than Shikhar Dhawan.