TheGame
Full Member
What on earth.
My bad. It was a typo. I went to the game. It was u19 indeed.This seemed amazing, given the A teams usually feature established domestic players, often with full international experience.
Just looked up the story and can see one about a 13 year old (though maybe it's turned out he's 15?) scoring a century v Australia U19. Is that the one? That seems more likely, as that level means they'll all be fellow inexperienced teenagers. Still a very good effort to do it at that age against older teens.
Very bizarre lineup, you would have thought they would have stuck with a similar balance to what they normally do to reinforce the batting but it’s weaker in that respect and they are likely to pay for it.Never seen india put out such a strange 11.
Nepotism.I think India didn't have much options in terms of the 11 because of Rohit & Gill missing but I can't believe the level of mismanagement over this series & the NZ series. There is no coherent thinking at all. In India when Gill got injured they moved Kohli to 3 rather than Rahul but now Rahul is your extra opener. Paddikal wasn't in the original squad but plays the test match. Sarfaraz who played all 3 tests against NZ doesn't play here. I feel like too many decisions have been made based on random tour matches in Australia. How is Harshit getting a debut but didn't get a chance at all against NZ while Akashdeep who played there is sitting here. Very strange stuff
You actually seem to have a better analysis of Indian cricket than GambhirI think India didn't have much options in terms of the 11 because of Rohit & Gill missing but I can't believe the level of mismanagement over this series & the NZ series. There is no coherent thinking at all. In India when Gill got injured they moved Kohli to 3 rather than Rahul but now Rahul is your extra opener. Paddikal wasn't in the original squad but plays the test match. Sarfaraz who played all 3 tests against NZ doesn't play here. I feel like too many decisions have been made based on random tour matches in Australia. How is Harshit getting a debut but didn't get a chance at all against NZ while Akashdeep who played there is sitting here. Very strange stuff
I was stunned by Jadeja being dropped. His batting abroad has been massive for IndiaIt's a team caught between two ideas. A change is needed, but they've changed the wrong positions. My line-up for this tour would have been: KL, Jaiswal, Sudarshan, Gill, Rishabh, Jurel, Jadeja, Ashwin, Siraj, Bumrah, Mukesh
The delta between what is offered by the bowling old guard(Ashwin, Jadeja) and their potential replacements, is a lot less than that between the batting old guard. This is happening because the batters are undroppable due to status + Gambhir for some reason has decided the "IPL emerging players" list is the right criteria for test selection.
Sundar is not better than Jadeja. Nitish Reddy has < 10 games and his best performances are in the IPL. Harshit Rana <10 first class games. Padikkal looked terrible versus England.
Sundar offers little with the ball - his wickets are proof that anyone can take wickets on rigged pitches in India, not that he is now a test quality spinner.
Yep thought they would have stick to the all rounders at 7 and 8 and then picked 3 seamers. Very strange decision to have Sundar at 7. It’s basically a very long tail. Are there not any fast bowling all rounders for India aside from Pandya?It's a team caught between two ideas. A change is needed, but they've changed the wrong positions. My line-up for this tour would have been: KL, Jaiswal, Sudarshan, Gill, Rishabh, Jurel, Jadeja, Ashwin, Siraj, Bumrah, Mukesh
The delta between what is offered by the bowling old guard(Ashwin, Jadeja) and their potential replacements, is a lot less than that between the batting old guard. This is happening because the batters are undroppable due to status + Gambhir for some reason has decided the "IPL emerging players" list is the right criteria for test selection.
Sundar is not better than Jadeja. Nitish Reddy has < 10 games and his best performances are in the IPL. Harshit Rana <10 first class games. Padikkal looked terrible versus England.
Sundar offers little with the ball - his wickets are proof that anyone can take wickets on rigged pitches in India, not that he is now a test quality spinner.
Ridiculous bowling
GOAT across all formats. crazy
Greatest bowler of all time? Let's calm down.
It's amazing how batsman today can't seem to play on pitches that have a bit of deviation. It's as if they've become so used to playing on dead pitches that as soon as it starts moving their defenses aren't able to cope.
It's not a bad shout, some of the past greats didn't get to play T20 so it's a smaller pool anywayhe is the GOAT across formats, you just have to deal with it I'm afraid
It's not a bad shout, some of the past greats didn't get to play T20 so it's a smaller pool anyway
not even sure it was worth england saving test cricket when other nations then just play it like this.
Played another 10 balls doing nothingLabuschagne's strike rate is something special. 4.76 with 2 from 42
he is the GOAT across formats, you just have to deal with it I'm afraid
not even sure it was worth england saving test cricket when other nations then just play it like this.
Yes
Or wait do you means it he greatest when you consider all three formats together, and not necessarily the greatest in each format? Then I agree he definitely is.