Cricket

This seemed amazing, given the A teams usually feature established domestic players, often with full international experience.

Just looked up the story and can see one about a 13 year old (though maybe it's turned out he's 15?) scoring a century v Australia U19. Is that the one? That seems more likely, as that level means they'll all be fellow inexperienced teenagers. Still a very good effort to do it at that age against older teens.
My bad. It was a typo. I went to the game. It was u19 indeed.
 
Classic start from an away side in Australia.

Clinical stuff from Hazelwood in particular.
 
I think India didn't have much options in terms of the 11 because of Rohit & Gill missing but I can't believe the level of mismanagement over this series & the NZ series. There is no coherent thinking at all. In India when Gill got injured they moved Kohli to 3 rather than Rahul but now Rahul is your extra opener. Paddikal wasn't in the original squad but plays the test match. Sarfaraz who played all 3 tests against NZ doesn't play here. I feel like too many decisions have been made based on random tour matches in Australia. How is Harshit getting a debut but didn't get a chance at all against NZ while Akashdeep who played there is sitting here. Very strange stuff
 
I think India didn't have much options in terms of the 11 because of Rohit & Gill missing but I can't believe the level of mismanagement over this series & the NZ series. There is no coherent thinking at all. In India when Gill got injured they moved Kohli to 3 rather than Rahul but now Rahul is your extra opener. Paddikal wasn't in the original squad but plays the test match. Sarfaraz who played all 3 tests against NZ doesn't play here. I feel like too many decisions have been made based on random tour matches in Australia. How is Harshit getting a debut but didn't get a chance at all against NZ while Akashdeep who played there is sitting here. Very strange stuff
Nepotism.

Harshit Rana plays for KKR, which is where Gambhir was.
 
I think India didn't have much options in terms of the 11 because of Rohit & Gill missing but I can't believe the level of mismanagement over this series & the NZ series. There is no coherent thinking at all. In India when Gill got injured they moved Kohli to 3 rather than Rahul but now Rahul is your extra opener. Paddikal wasn't in the original squad but plays the test match. Sarfaraz who played all 3 tests against NZ doesn't play here. I feel like too many decisions have been made based on random tour matches in Australia. How is Harshit getting a debut but didn't get a chance at all against NZ while Akashdeep who played there is sitting here. Very strange stuff
You actually seem to have a better analysis of Indian cricket than Gambhir
 
It's a team caught between two ideas. A change is needed, but they've changed the wrong positions. My line-up for this tour would have been: KL, Jaiswal, Sudarshan, Gill, Rishabh, Jurel, Jadeja, Ashwin, Siraj, Bumrah, Mukesh

The delta between what is offered by the bowling old guard(Ashwin, Jadeja) and their potential replacements, is a lot less than that between the batting old guard. This is happening because the batters are undroppable due to status + Gambhir for some reason has decided the "IPL emerging players" list is the right criteria for test selection.

Sundar is not better than Jadeja. Nitish Reddy has < 10 games and his best performances are in the IPL. Harshit Rana <10 first class games. Padikkal looked terrible versus England.

Sundar offers little with the ball - his wickets are proof that anyone can take wickets on rigged pitches in India, not that he is now a test quality spinner.
 
It's a team caught between two ideas. A change is needed, but they've changed the wrong positions. My line-up for this tour would have been: KL, Jaiswal, Sudarshan, Gill, Rishabh, Jurel, Jadeja, Ashwin, Siraj, Bumrah, Mukesh

The delta between what is offered by the bowling old guard(Ashwin, Jadeja) and their potential replacements, is a lot less than that between the batting old guard. This is happening because the batters are undroppable due to status + Gambhir for some reason has decided the "IPL emerging players" list is the right criteria for test selection.

Sundar is not better than Jadeja. Nitish Reddy has < 10 games and his best performances are in the IPL. Harshit Rana <10 first class games. Padikkal looked terrible versus England.

Sundar offers little with the ball - his wickets are proof that anyone can take wickets on rigged pitches in India, not that he is now a test quality spinner.
I was stunned by Jadeja being dropped. His batting abroad has been massive for India
 
Just looked at the scorecard, had to double check if it was a tour game, with all the changes. Horrible
 
It's a team caught between two ideas. A change is needed, but they've changed the wrong positions. My line-up for this tour would have been: KL, Jaiswal, Sudarshan, Gill, Rishabh, Jurel, Jadeja, Ashwin, Siraj, Bumrah, Mukesh

The delta between what is offered by the bowling old guard(Ashwin, Jadeja) and their potential replacements, is a lot less than that between the batting old guard. This is happening because the batters are undroppable due to status + Gambhir for some reason has decided the "IPL emerging players" list is the right criteria for test selection.

Sundar is not better than Jadeja. Nitish Reddy has < 10 games and his best performances are in the IPL. Harshit Rana <10 first class games. Padikkal looked terrible versus England.

Sundar offers little with the ball - his wickets are proof that anyone can take wickets on rigged pitches in India, not that he is now a test quality spinner.
Yep thought they would have stick to the all rounders at 7 and 8 and then picked 3 seamers. Very strange decision to have Sundar at 7. It’s basically a very long tail. Are there not any fast bowling all rounders for India aside from Pandya?
 
I don't understand what Kohlis playing for anymore? His career average is now closer to VVS Laxmans than Rahul Dravids.
 
Wow Bumrah - so close to another hatrick! Very good first over from Rana, needs to be consistent.
 
GOAT across all formats. crazy

Greatest bowler of all time? Let's calm down.

It's amazing how batsman today can't seem to play on pitches that have a bit of deviation. It's as if they've become so used to playing on dead pitches that as soon as it starts moving their defenses aren't able to cope.
 
Bumrah is a champion bowler, possibly a GOAT. I knew he'd be a menace in Australia.
 
Greatest bowler of all time? Let's calm down.

It's amazing how batsman today can't seem to play on pitches that have a bit of deviation. It's as if they've become so used to playing on dead pitches that as soon as it starts moving their defenses aren't able to cope.

he is the GOAT across formats, you just have to deal with it I'm afraid
 
It's not a bad shout, some of the past greats didn't get to play T20 so it's a smaller pool anyway

You can still extrapolate from ODI performance

Steyn is an all timer and wasn't any good at limited overs. There's a specific kind of player who is good at all 3

I think the debate is between McGrath, Warne, Bumrah if you take all 3 formats into account. Can't think of anyone else

Bumrah is good in every country in test cricket, good with the new and old ball. In limited overs, he bowls every phase equally well, as does he in T20. Not only that - he is lethal with new ball and clutch at death
 
not even sure it was worth england saving test cricket when other nations then just play it like this.
 
he is the GOAT across formats, you just have to deal with it I'm afraid

:lol:

Or wait do you means it he greatest when you consider all three formats together, and not necessarily the greatest in each format? Then I agree he definitely is. Greatest all round bowler when combining all three formats. Honestly, can't think of another bowler who was amongst the best in all three formats at the same time, maybe Steyn during the early days of T20?

not even sure it was worth england saving test cricket when other nations then just play it like this.

What's ironic is that, in the pursuit to play more attacking cricket in tests, like England have, teams have forgotten how to defend. England, in trying to save test cricket, have caused it's downfall.
 
Last edited:

Stats check out as well. Closest people are Steyn, Kuldeep and Ajmal, which are expected. Ajmal was unstoppable in all formats for a 3-4 year spell in the early 2010's but he is a chucker so he's out; Kuldeep doesn't play enough test matches. Steyn would be the only competition.
 
This is honestly an extraordinary scorecard

I thought we were shite and Australia look stacked on paper

It looks like we'll have a lead, and we barely brought batters to Australia