Though there is still a flaw in that plan in that Cunha would cost 50m, we got quoted 75m for Branthwaite and so on
Of course, it's just hard to name successful ones from the PL for us
so their transfer fees and wage demands often remain reasonable
The fact the closest to today player in this list is RvP more than 10 years ago speaks volumes tbhDepends how far you want to go back but there's loads.
RvP, Rio, Pallister, Bruce, Yorke, Cole etc etc.
Keane, Carrick, VdS, Berba, Tevez.Depends how far you want to go back but there's loads.
RvP, Rio, Pallister, Bruce, Yorke, Cole etc etc.
Yeah that's fair, Shaw wasn't a great example. Could also look at Matic, Maguire, AWB. Not saying every PL transfer we did recently was terrible, but don't see them outperforming our signings from outside the PL by any meansShaw shouldn't be ranked with these 2.
Shaw at least has had some top quality times with us, the other 2 ranged from average to an absolute ghost.
Though there is still a flaw in that plan in that Cunha would cost 50m, we got quoted 75m for Branthwaite and so on
Solanke was £65 million. So pretty much a guarantee they’ll want £65 million at the very least.Wolves bought him for 50m, so would expect much more if they stay up.
This is why we can't make these loose statements about how we "should" look at prem signings, outside prem signings down the leagues, european top league signings, european smaller league signings, promising youngsters.Yeah that's fair, Shaw wasn't a great example. Could also look at Matic, Maguire, AWB. Not saying every PL transfer we did recently was terrible, but don't see them outperforming our signings from outside the PL by any means
If ever there's a line that makes you worry about us ever returning to the top.Solanke was £65 million. So pretty much a guarantee they’ll want £65 million at the very least.
Pure chance should've let us sign a banger, but nopeThis is why we can't make these loose statements about how we "should" look at prem signings, outside prem signings down the leagues, european top league signings, european smaller league signings, promising youngsters.
We've signed examples from all of the above to almost hilarious minimal success - like you could barely get it worse than getting 1 right every 20-25 signings.
Bruno is that one in 25, and on matchday threads you still have loads moaning about him.Pure chance should've let us sign a banger, but nope
Yep. It’s just recruiting the right profiles, it doesn’t matter whether they’ve been in the PL for 6 seasons or a Ligue 1 Uber Eater.Like when we bought Wan Bissaka, Maguire, Schneiderlin, Mount etc etc?
Yeah sorry I should have had a + sign after thatWolves bought him for 50m, so would expect much more if they stay up.
So you need to go a long way back then.Depends how far you want to go back but there's loads.
RvP, Rio, Pallister, Bruce, Yorke, Cole etc etc.
Blame Pep for infecting us with this uninspiring robotic ‘style’ killing off the creative number 10s and wingers.Bruno is that one in 25, and on matchday threads you still have loads moaning about him.
I dare say a lot of them still think Mount is the answer because he "presses well".
I mean what a time to be alive, talking about "pressing" being such an important quality in attacking players
So, pick a player that suits the style and don’t factor much else into itDon't:
- Sign a short-term fix
- Sign "experience"
- Sign "he knows the league"
- Sign unsuitable for style
- Sign "we can fix him".
Truth be told, Mata and Fellaini were among our better PL signings since SAF retiredToo harsh on Mata. Played in a lot of positions and contributed quite a bit, 0.43 G/As per 90 mins in the PL over that many years in some atrocious, low scoring teams. For long periods, we were set up as counterattacking teams when he'd thrive more in possession teams (a la Silva at City).
Fair point that he probably was the wrong transfer for the kinds of managers we ended up hiring, but I wouldn't say he was an obvious failed transfer.
He ran around a lot, but not sure he was actually a good presser.Blame Pep for infecting us with this uninspiring robotic ‘style’ killing off the creative number 10s and wingers.
Just a thought, Jesse Lingard, if only he’d have been born a few years later
Heh compared to some nameless current players, he put a shift inHe ran around a lot, but not sure he was actually a good presser.
Infamous for going a year at United as a regular without a goal or an assist.
That takes real doing that does.
Ye he killed off iniesta and kdb.Blame Pep for infecting us with this uninspiring robotic ‘style’ killing off the creative number 10s and wingers.
Just a thought, Jesse Lingard, if only he’d have been born a few years later
Also all pl teams are richer, and don't need to sell.One of the stand-out features of SAF's sides - full confession: this was my era as a match-going fan and, yes, I was spoiled - was the regular recruitment of some of the very best PL talent. As others have already said, some of our very best players came from other PL clubs.
We could and should be doing better in the domestic market and we definitely need to get away from the madness of splurging inflated fees and crazy salaries on aged, big names, but we also need to recognise this is not the mid-90s, when, to a large extent, we had a free run on star talents at Villa, Spurs and others. Everyone recognises we have rivals with at least as much buying power - less well recognised is the fact that clubs with any sort of PL tenure simply don't have to sell as they did 15-20 years ago because they're so much richer. And, when they do sell, well, we know the rest on the going rates.
Getting value, will mean acting quickly and doing deals before a player's reputation sky-rockets, and the fee balloons, because other clubs are in the chase.
When we signed Premier League proven players pre 2013, they usually went into a fully functioning side and they were probably made to look a little bit better than they actually were.One of the stand-out features of SAF's sides - full confession: this was my era as a match-going fan and, yes, I was spoiled - was the regular recruitment of some of the very best PL talent. As others have already said, some of our very best players came from other PL clubs.
We could and should be doing better in the domestic market and we definitely need to get away from the madness of splurging inflated fees and crazy salaries on aged, big names, but we also need to recognise this is not the mid-90s, when, to a large extent, we had a free run on star talents at Villa, Spurs and others. Everyone recognises we have rivals with at least as much buying power - less well recognised is the fact that clubs with any sort of PL tenure simply don't have to sell as they did 15-20 years ago because they're so much richer. And, when they do sell, well, we know the rest on the going rates.
Getting value, will mean acting quickly and doing deals before a player's reputation sky-rockets, and the fee balloons, because other clubs are in the chase.
Though there is still a flaw in that plan in that Cunha would cost 50m, we got quoted 75m for Branthwaite and so on
Yep, relatively - I think the key theme is that a whole bunch of smaller, typically mid-table, clubs, simply don't need to sell as they once did, as sales are just less important to them. Which is how and why Brighton, for e.g. are able to extract so many huge fees (totally accepting Brighton have a specific model under Tony Bloom).Also all pl teams are richer, and don't need to sell.
It's why when we sold players like welbeck I think it was a bad idea.Yep, relatively - I think the key theme is that a whole bunch of smaller, typically mid-table, clubs, simply don't need to sell as they once did, as sales are just less important to them. Which is how and why Brighton, for e.g. are able to extract so many huge fees (totally accepting Brighton have a specific model under Tony Bloom).
Highly questionable at the momentFair point. And I agree. Buying PL-proven often cost a bit more. And I think that is a premium price that, in the long run, would save money. People quote that Cunha would be expensive. Probably true. But Man Utd can afford to pay up. That is an edge we should make use off.
Zirkzee cost £40 mill. Hojlund £70 mill. Cunha would probably cost somewhere inbetween, Solanke cost £60 mill.
Lisandro Martinez cost £55 mill. Varane on a three year contract cost £40 mill and a huge salary. I would gladly pay a bit more for a young, PL proven defender at a reasonable wage. I like Yoro, but I’m not sure that was smart considering our need for someone ti improve us now.
Furthermore, we paid £80 mill for Antony and Sancho. Each. That type of money should be earmarked for PL-proven players.
I’m not saying we should not buy exciting young players from abroad. But we should not have to throw big money at those players. Look what Brighton pay. Or Sporting.
Approx 20 percent of our spending post Ferguson have been on PL-players. The rest on players abroad. I would prefer if it was the other way around. Or at least 70/30.
Highly questionable at the moment
Very unlikely, and the new people running things don't wanna spend big.For now. But in the long rund we can due to high revenue. We will likely offload Maguire, Casemiro, Antony, Sancho (permanently) and Rashford within a year or two. Then we will be able to spend like we have the past couple of years.
Very unlikely, and the new people running things don't wanna spend big.
Well we won't be as big as we were, I think that's without a doubt. We cannot keep up with certain other clubs, we need to be more efficient in other areas.Then Man Utd will never compete again, we will become less attractive commercially in the long run, and they will lose alot of money.