Tel074
New Member
- Joined
- May 8, 2019
- Messages
- 1,531
The rules also implied there would be a winner, and 3 teams relegated.
Yes they did but if a season is cancelled it's understandable if a season is changed its a lawsuit
The rules also implied there would be a winner, and 3 teams relegated.
Again neutral venues is not an advantage for any team due to having no crowd. I don't get why people think this. It's a bit pathetic that people are complaining this will ruin the leagues integrityNeutral venues and anything apart from finishing the season as it started is non event . Clubs start a season in good faith and to give anyone a certain advantage now just to go finish a season is insane . No one wants a void season but it's better to void than to change the rules during the season
The FA should just void the season.
Start anew in August, behind closed doors if necessary. No promotion or relegation.
But if they void it what happens to the CL spots for next season - will they be awarded based on the table when the league was stopped, or last season’s finish?
Again neutral venues is not an advantage for any team due to having no crowd. I don't get why people think this. It's a bit pathetic that people are complaining this will ruin the leagues integrity
How is that not an advantage?
When your team is due to a visit to Old Trafford in your remaining game, and now playing at BCD? So yes, the integrity of the league is already ruined, there's nothing anyone can do to make it as real as pre corona
Surely Liverpool get to start every game they play with a few goals head start just to acknowledge the gigantic lead they have in the league? You know, since sporting integrity is so high on the agenda.
“Lucky win and a draw”?I'd be shocked if the season doesn't end with a few lawsuits. There is absolutely no way the team that goes down will accept the relegation, and in a way its fair as well.
Look at BHA's games. They have Arsenal, United, Pool and City left but all of them are at home. They can easily argue that at a home venue, they might have picked up a lucky win and a draw or something like that. But playing at a neutral venue removes all that advantage.
And if you remove relegation from the season, a lot of their players might just refuse to play as they'd regard safety of their families, themselves to be of utmost importance. This would mean that Utd's run-in would basically be a game vs Leicester, Spurs and 7 odd dead rubbers. Should we qualify for CL because of this, Chelsea would surely raise this.
In a way, one can argue that they should follow Eredivisie's model and be done with it
It’s weird how you don’t understand it.Again neutral venues is not an advantage for any team due to having no crowd. I don't get why people think this. It's a bit pathetic that people are complaining this will ruin the leagues integrity
BBC are saying sanctions on clubs going against BCD. Are the FA saying this in public?
It’s weird how you don’t understand it.
There won't be any crowds allowed for any sporting event in 2020 at least so what are they meant to do. Every sport will carry on and adjust. How can football clubs survive with no football till next year. It's a pandemic for God sake and an adjustment like neutral venues has to be made. With no fans being able to attend games, what is the difference in playing at a neutral venue compared to an empty Old Trafford. I see hardly any difference. I am a Manchester United fan and accept neutral venues will have to be used.
That is true but it is a pandemic. It's better to finish the season if you can than to cancel it. I mean what about my team Manchester United. Have a great chance of getting top four but can't due to teams refusing to play at neutral venues. It's kind of infuriating as a Manchester United fan if the season can't be completed because of that. Also the PPG will just be the table as it is now. I mean I would accept the season being canceled if it isn't safe to play footballStill it's an advantage and disadvantage for this season which has played 3/4.
My argument was you cant maintain 100 percent integrity this season, might as well use ppg to conclude it
How the hell is it better to risk thousands of lives just so that you can decide who finished 4th? Isnt that the very definitions of selfish?That is true but it is a pandemic. It's better to finish the season if you can than to cancel it. I mean what about my team Manchester United. Have a great chance of getting top four but can't due to teams refusing to play at neutral venues. It's kind of infuriating as a Manchester United fan if the season can't be completed because of that. Also the PPG will just be the table as it is now. I mean I would accept the season being canceled if it isn't safe to play football
So what ? It still doesn't change anything on the legal side of things. What was it that was being said by the footballing authorities a few weeks ago ? 'We'll start football again only when it's safe & appropriate to do so'. Well it's most certainly not safe to do so with this virus still very much around. & it's hardly appropriate either with hundreds still dying in this country. So whatever course of action they take - other than restarting only when it actually is safe & appropriate - is going to be the wrong one. So dates, plans for next season, etc, mean f**k all in the grand scheme of things. Too many people on here are getting bogged down with trivial little things & semantics. But if you look at the much bigger picture you'll see that we, the FA & PL, & the government, are all being held as hostages to fate by way of an insidious little twat called Covid-19.
Around 90 games are played from late June to late August for the qualifiers.I have seen a few people on here now say there won't be a CL next season. Its possible I suppose given the circumstances.
Surely if we find that out soon then there will be even less appetite to finish off this season. Can only think that Liverpool in the PL will care about it being completed.
What is the advantage though. Playing at home is literally having the crowd behind you. That's literally the advantage. However home team's won't have that due to no fans being allowed at the stadiums. So really what is it.
There won't be any crowds allowed for any sporting event in 2020 at least so what are they meant to do. Every sport will carry on and adjust. How can football clubs survive with no football till next year. It's a pandemic for God sake and an adjustment like neutral venues has to be made. With no fans being able to attend games, what is the difference in playing at a neutral venue compared to an empty Old Trafford. I see hardly any difference. I am a Manchester United fan and accept neutral venues will have to be used.
The fact the return fixture has already been played with one team previously having the advantage you stated.What is the advantage though. Playing at home is literally having the crowd behind you. That's literally the advantage. However home team's won't have that due to no fans being allowed at the stadiums. So really what is it.
You can‘t sanction clubs exercising their democratic rights. That’s mental. Either they have a vote or they don’t.
There won't be any crowds allowed for any sporting event in 2020 at least so what are they meant to do. Every sport will carry on and adjust. How can football clubs survive with no football till next year. It's a pandemic for God sake and an adjustment like neutral venues has to be made. With no fans being able to attend games, what is the difference in playing at a neutral venue compared to an empty Old Trafford. I see hardly any difference. I am a Manchester United fan and accept neutral venues will have to be used.
Surely this can't be true?BBC are saying sanctions on clubs going against BCD. Are the FA saying this in public?
That's just not true, there's a massive difference in playing Liverpool with a full Kop to an empty one.It is selfish. There is stuff all difference in playing at a neutral venue due to no spectators at the stadium. Premier league are doing it for safety reasons. Otherwise people would just congregate outside stadiums.
Surely this can't be true?
Doubt it.Get off the stage. If they had 38 points as opposed to 29 their stance would be completely different.
The only example that has been given is when Liverpool 'officially' win the PL, they don't want fans gathering outside Anfield.If all of next season or a significant part of it has be played behind closed doors will those games also have to be at neutral venues?
If not then whats the point of neutral venues to finish out this season?
Fortunately integrity is high on the agenda but stupidity isn't.
The only example that has been given is when Liverpool 'officially' win the PL, they don't want fans gathering outside Anfield.
But that is going to happen wherever they play. BCD has advantages and also disadvantages, like every proposition to finish off the season.
Surely this can't be true?
The more I think about it, the more I dont see the players at risk factor.How the hell is it better to risk thousands of lives just so that you can decide who finished 4th? Isnt that the very definitions of selfish?
If we continue BCD nothing much will change. Liverpool will win, leicester chelsea city top 4. Norwich relegated.
Other than the weird craving for football there's literally nothing to play. Ppg still has us finishing 5th and our cl spot will depends on city ban decision.
So remind me what are we playing for again? Novelty things such as who finished 6th and 7th?