Skizzo
Full Member
I'm amazed it's taking you and Choi as long as it has to lose patience with him. He's incapable of having any reasonable discussion.
Patience is part of the job. It’s been like training for these moments.
I'm amazed it's taking you and Choi as long as it has to lose patience with him. He's incapable of having any reasonable discussion.
While you guys jerk each other off over your reasonableness, let me interject. I absolutely have an agenda, I've never denied it. I dont trust anyone who sees the incredible amount of monstrous police crimes and doesnt have an agenda.
Interjecting on two guys jerking each other off just seems rude.
Sorry for not showing you the attention you crave for a moment while talking to someone else. Spotlight is back on you now, carry on fella
You and ivaldo made this about me, I just wanted to talk about 20% of cops being outed as violent racists.
Brilliant.Interjecting on two guys jerking each other off just seems rude.
Sorry for not showing you the attention you crave for a moment while talking to someone else. Spotlight is back on you now, carry on fella
Just like the last “10%” stat you posted, it’s somewhat misleading as a statistic since they didn’t actually take information from every cop. If I think racism is bad? Yes eboue racism is bad.
And again, you don’t want to talk. I’ve offered thoughts before and you just then use it condescendingly from then on with posts like “maybe they just need more training hue hue hue”
If we can agree that opposing interracial marriage is a typical warning sign of racism, then the police are within the margin of error of the national average here.
Ivaldo gon ivaldo...Someone has to be your foil.
The cavalry has arrived.Ivaldo gon ivaldo...
ok that's extremely racist but what's the percentage of cops who don't understand how stats workIf we can agree that opposing interracial marriage is a typical warning sign of racism, then the police are within the margin of error of the national average here.
1) I don’t know. Do you?ok that's extremely racist but what's the percentage of cops who don't understand how stats work
also the police being only as racist as the rest of the population, in a country as racist as America, isn't exactly a win
I actually saw them blur a face this past Friday.
They busted some preppy white chick who ended up having a mobile drug lab in the trunk of her car. I guess they feared for her life because she just lost someone ALOT of money.
Well, they don’t blur spectators out in anything else.I mean even the passers by from the ones I've seen.
Well, they don’t blur spectators out in anything else.
It's called sampling. Just like how polls dont call every single voter.
Oh snapIt’s not “sampling” when the tweet you posted (which has since been deleted, wonder why) said the numbers reflected 10% of all current officers, when he didn’t realize the numbers were actually taken over a 10 year period. His math was also questioned in the twitter thread.
@Silva can read that too in case he was trying to refer to me in his cops and stats comment
they probably just need more training
The Plain View Project, launched by Philadelphia lawyer Emily Baker-White, examined the accounts of about 2,900 officers from eight departments across the country and an additional 600 retired officers from those same departments. She compiled posts that represented troubling conduct in a database that is replete with racist imagery and memes, and in some cases long, vitriolic exchanges involving multiple officers.
Of the pages of officers whom the Plain View researchers could positively identify, about 1 in 5 of the current officers, and 2 in 5 of the retired officers, made public posts or comments that met that threshold
The Plain View Project used department rosters to search for Facebook pages for every officer in Phoenix; St. Louis; Philadelphia; Dallas; York, Pennsylvania; Twin Falls, Idaho; Denison, Texas; and Lake County, Florida. The locations were chosen to achieve a range of geography and size.
yeah, long term studies are famous for suckingIt’s not “sampling” when the tweet you posted (which has since been deleted, wonder why) said the numbers reflected 10% of all current officers, when he didn’t realize the numbers were actually taken over a 10 year period. His math was also questioned in the twitter thread.
@Silva can read that too in case he was trying to refer to me in his cops and stats comment
thats a different article fella.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/16/sunday-review/ralph-northam-blackface-friends.htmlPlus considering my shift consists of 10 people - Myself, a white female, two Filipinos, three Hispanics males, an African American, an Asian and one other white guy - I’m not sure what part of your invalid claims about my department to be wary of.
yeah, long term studies are famous for sucking
Which is why I said “the last 10% article”.
This one has approximate 500 posts from approximately 3000 officers which is all the could recognize on social media from the approximately 14500 officers employed by the departments they looked at in 8 cities or states which met a threshold that only had to include bias...and that’s enough to allege 20% of all officers across the country.
So the other 747,000 to 847,000 officers are painted by the same brush because of that huge undertaking of research.
just wait till you hear about sample sizes
I’ll check buzzfeed for that too.
you might learn something
BREAKING: the new york times also has comic strips
if an article came out exposing that a significant portion of [whatever it is i do] were violent racists i wouldnt say "8.5% is not 10%" or quibble about which publication posted the article. i would say "wow thats terrible"
You’re cool.oink oink
if an article came out exposing that a significant portion of [whatever it is i do] were violent racists i wouldnt say "8.5% is not 10%" or quibble about which publication posted the article. i would say "wow thats terrible"