Has this been discussed?
http://m.chron.com/news/houston-tex...ompson-terminated-from-sheriff-s-11306134.php
Video
In how many other professions are you placed in a situation where you are expected to be shot at by a bad guy, defend yourself and then immediately save the same guy's life while he begs you for help?
WARNING: graphic.
Officers went above and beyond their duty...a man tried to take their life then begs then to save his. Crazy shit.
I'm sure it's not an US policing problem tho.... A few bad apples right? Care to comment? @Skizzo / @choiboyx012
Would you have laughed? Would you have looked visibly uncomfortable? Do you think individuals coming out after the fact to condemn it excuses the 'joke' (many a true feeling expressed in jest) and the reaction?Did that answer your question?
No idea why some text is big
I'm sure it's not an US policing problem tho.... A few bad apples right? Care to comment? @Skizzo / @choiboyx012
Yea you just literally reiterated the same thing. I don't know, for me, I wouldn't be cheering or clapping, I'd be looking dead into the faces of the people around me, but that's how I am and probably why I have a hard time relating.To be fair...
1. I've laughed at jokes containing material and topics I strongly disagree with. I've heard Seinfeld joke about police roughing up suspects during apprehension, then gently reminding the suspect to bend the head to avoid hitting it on the frame. Given the times we're in, it is bad optics, but I probably wouldn't look too far into it.
2. Many police departments at the local, state and federal level have released statements condemning the essence behind Trump's comments, recognizing that suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and should be treated with the utmost professionalism.
No. I'd rather you didn't pretend that you don't have problems in the police force and in the country as a whole... I know you think I'm hard on you but someone has to be. Normalisation is setting in and you don't seem to think there are any issues, everything is as it should be?If you want me to just say all cops are evil and Boo America, then just say so.
Yea you just literally reiterated the same thing. I don't know, for me, I wouldn't be cheering or clapping, I'd be looking dead into the faces of the people around me, but that's how I am and probably why I have a hard time relating.
Your point 2 is obviously a good thing but it doesn't negate what actually happened at the event. FWIW I'm fully consistent, I'm that guy that doesn't laugh at those 'jokes' and makes it clear, no matter how uncomfortable that makes people around me.
No. I'd rather you didn't pretend that you don't have problems in the police force and in the country as a whole... I know you think I'm hard on you but someone has to be. Normalisation is setting in and you don't seem to think there are any issues, everything is as it should be?
I mean feck me, the president of the US making jokes about police brutality and a bunch of high ranking people laughing heartily at it.... Jesus.
Yea you just literally reiterated the same thing. I don't know, for me, I wouldn't be cheering or clapping, I'd be looking dead into the faces of the people around me, but that's how I am and probably why I have a hard time relating.
Your point 2 is obviously a good thing but it doesn't negate what actually happened at the event. FWIW I'm fully consistent, I'm that guy that doesn't laugh at those 'jokes' and makes it clear, no matter how uncomfortable that makes people around me.
No. I'd rather you didn't pretend that you don't have problems in the police force and in the country as a whole... I know you think I'm hard on you but someone has to be.
Frankly, I'm less concerned about this, and more concerned about the "tough on crime" stance the current administration is taking, a roll back from Obama's tenure when there was more of an emphasis on fixing police-public relations and introducing criminal justice reform policies. The Sessions-Trump combo would not look out of place in the 70s, a sad indictment.
Yea you just literally reiterated the same thing. I don't know, for me, I wouldn't be cheering or clapping, I'd be looking dead into the faces of the people around me, but that's how I am and probably why I have a hard time relating.
Your point 2 is obviously a good thing but it doesn't negate what actually happened at the event. FWIW I'm fully consistent, I'm that guy that doesn't laugh at those 'jokes' and makes it clear, no matter how uncomfortable that makes people around me.
No. I'd rather you didn't pretend that you don't have problems in the police force and in the country as a whole... I know you think I'm hard on you but someone has to be. Normalisation is setting in and you don't seem to think there are any issues, everything is as it should be?
I mean feck me, the president of the US making jokes about police brutality and a bunch of high ranking people laughing heartily at it.... Jesus.
I guess it's really true that not all heroes wear capes.
Where did I pretend there's no issues in the police force or the country? You asked my opinion on this specific incident, and I told you. I've criticized other instances they have been discussed on here, and said there's plenty of work to be done to get things to where they should be. Both in terms of policies and general public relations.
It's true. Some wear a badge
Where did I pretend there's no issues in the police force or the country? You asked my opinion on this specific incident, and I told you. I've criticized other instances they have been discussed on here, and said there's plenty of work to be done to get things to where they should be. Both in terms of policies and general public relations.
Jokes aside, what's your point? I should lay off him? Or police in general? If it's the former then fair enough, the latter? Fcuk off...I'm just glad Afro is around to give you such a hard time, there just aren't enough people willing to put in the hard graft of absolutely slating American officers, with absolutely generic and unequivocal condemnation, these days.
Lord knows what you'd be up to otherwise, you over empowered, heartless, lawbreaking thug.
That's the Police chief.“I know Wayne didn’t do this on purpose. He didn’t do this offend anybody,” Villejoin said. “I apologize to anybody that it offended, believe me.”
Jokes aside, what's your point? I should lay off him? Or police in general? If it's the former then fair enough, the latter? Fcuk off...
I'm just glad Afro is around to give you such a hard time, there just aren't enough people willing to put in the hard graft of absolutely slating American officers, with absolutely generic and unequivocal condemnation, these days.
Lord knows what you'd be up to otherwise, you over empowered, heartless, lawbreaking thug.
This is more of an indictment of your own stubborn views and prejudices than anything else to be honest. @Skizzo gives an honest account of how he saw things and you call him a 'talking head'. It's alarming you don't see your own hypocrisy in all this.Would you have laughed? Would you have looked visibly uncomfortable? Do you think individuals coming out after the fact to condemn it excuses the 'joke' (many a true feeling expressed in jest) and the reaction?
It's something, but I find the preceding events to be more telling. It is what it is, not scripted, not curated...
I expected you to give the answer that you gave (call it a joke, point to the condemnation after the fact, not comment on the crowd reaction, blame the host) as it's the same answer that every other PO or somewhat connected talking head has given. I'd have been pleasantly surprised if you deviated...
So yes, I guess you have answered my question.
Edit: This bit is moreso for the Trump thread but you guys (Americans) carry on excusing the behaviour of your president. 'Trump behind Trump' etc... let's see where that takes ya...
I said he had the same response as the talking head. Seriously, typical redcafe. Make it about the poster not the subject....This is more of an indictment of your own stubborn views and prejudices than anything else to be honest. @Skizzo gives an honest account of how he saw things and you call him a 'talking head'. It's alarming you don't see your own hypocrisy in all this.
I can't relate, you can. It is what it is.My opinion on the story is there's much worse going on and worth talking about. I don't think it's fair to categorically say that it's indicative of anything more than a bunch of officers laughing and clapping at a shit joke made by their president, I think it reflects more on Trump than anyone lined up behind him, I've long given up hope for any remote kind of accountability for anything he says though.
I think the presenter is extremely poor. It's inflammatory, narrow minded and prejudiced in itself to broad brush the way he does. In many ways it's like a mirror image of idiocy. Trumps a moron for saying it, you would hope officers would react with more sense and the presenter shouldn't make ridiculously unfair extrapolations about literally all police in America.
Why? Because it's not a good look. Why isn't it a good look?you would hope officers would react with more sense.
Why's that then? Because it highlights something that you don't particularly want to talk about?It's a fool's debate.
I think it's a pointless thread at this stage.
What are you even talking about? I ask his opinion and he says what I expected him to say. I let him know that.... What's the big deal? Did you think I hurt his feelings or something? Respect? Did I disrespect him? The guys supposed to be a police officer I would have thought this discussion would wash over him like water...You provocatively call into the thread to American police officers then immediately dismiss their contribution. Did you ever want their opinion because you show no respect for it? You immediately patronise and point score 'I knew you'd say that' whilst telling us how you see yourself as the arbiter of justice in calling out comments and not following the herd. Give me a break.
Damn sonyou see yourself as the arbiter of justice in calling out comments and not following the herd. Give me a break
So exit the thread then? What are you expecting to be discussed in here? I was actually hoping for the police in here to engage in a conversation rather than just trying to explain shite away. Maybe tell us how they think things can improve, maybe discuss some of the more unexplainable fcukries posted in here. C'est la vie...There's no win. It's been done to death, people think there's plenty of officers doing a good job, people condone illegal or immoral acts by police, people try to talk about gun culture and America's unique issues but it always comes back to the same conversation over and over and no-one learns, moves on or changes.
Feel free to put me on ignore....I appreciate these 2 guys doing their best to explain what they think though, less so your contributions.
Such a pointless comment, basically you don't like the fact that I'm criticising the police, you seem to think I'm trying to make this about me? You can't stand to read it?- classic police defending just what I expected, I'm so clever, go feck yoursef and your choice of career - there I saved you the bother!
Aside from the fact that I didn't call him a talking head, what exactly is my prejudices, views and hypocrisies?This is more of an indictment of your own stubborn views and prejudices than anything else to be honest. @Skizzo gives an honest account of how he saw things and you call him a 'talking head'. It's alarming you don't see your own hypocrisy in all this.
And you too...Deary me.
Have a good evening mate.
You've said he gave the same answer, you're arguing semantics now, the point is the same regardless.Aside from the fact that I didn't call him a talking head, what exactly is my prejudices, views and hypocrisies?
Sums what up? And how is it semantics? We're all different people so I don't expect us all to see eye to eye, but at least read what I'm saying and don't put words in my mouth. I asked you what are my prejudices, views and hypocrisies?You've said he gave the same answer, you're arguing semantics now, the point is the same regardless.
See @Duafc post, it sums it up nicely.
I literally just said how it's arguing semantics, the point is still the same but instead of tackling the point you want to talk about how I said you called him a talking head as opposed to having the same opinion as a talking head. Essentially you've accused him of towing the line, so it doesn't matter either way, or would you care to explain to unsubtle differences?Sums what up? And how is it semantics? We're all different people so I don't expect us all to see eye to eye, but at least read what I'm saying and don't put words in my mouth. I asked you what are my prejudices, views and hypocrisies?
Where? Where do I do this?You complain about cops stereotyping, and then stereotype cops, repeatedly.
I literally just said how it's arguing semantics, the point is still the same but instead of tackling the point you want to talk about how I said you called him a talking head as opposed to having the same opinion as a talking head. Essentially you've accused him of towing the line, so it doesn't matter either way, or would you care to explain to unsubtle differences?
There you go again, I don't know if they'll recall but I've already told both cops that I think it's a minority so I don't know where you're going with this. You need to actually read my posts...You generalise cops and then complain about their stereotyping, you're so entrenched in your negative perceptions of a vastly varied group of men and women you can't see it.
Which is fine and I entirely agree, but starting with the assumption the police officer will do something wrong or is a bad apple is not the way to do it, especially when you are expecting the officer to have a similarly unbiased view on, say, you as a black man. That's hypocrisy mate, by its very definition, and having that generic view of an officer is a big part of the problem.Where? Where do I do this?
I'm talking about cops defending bad cops, even when there's not enough info to do so. I'm talking about cops being unwilling to accept that there's a problem with policing. Nothing will get better until this starts to happen, until there's more introspection in the US police system, training, diversity, weeding out the bad fcuking eggs...
But here we are talking about me and my supposed hypocrisies and prejudices
Wait so it's that I said he's toeing the party line then? Ok that's fair. I think that towing the party line and palming it off as a joke and done clueless police officers laughing at said totally inappropriate and unfunny joke is naive at best... At worst, you work it out.
There you go again, I don't know if they'll recall but I've already told both cops that I think it's a minority so I don't know where you're going with this. You need to actually read my posts...
If you don't understand how that is stereotyping, how that is hypocrisy, then buy a dictionary.I expected you to give the answer that you gave (call it a joke, point to the condemnation after the fact, not comment on the crowd reaction, blame the host) as it's the same answer that every other PO or somewhat connected talking head has given.
I'll own that one then, cops defend other cops. Controversial I know. Nobodies ever heard that before... Regardless you can call it a prejudice then, one that you can easily dispel mind, just by opening your mouth.Which is fine and I entirely agree, but starting with the assumption the police officer will do something wrong or is a bad apple is not the way to do it, especially when you are expecting the officer to have a similarly unbiased view on, say, you as a black man. That's hypocrisy mate, by its very definition, and having that generic view of an officer is a big part of the problem.
You've invited an officer to give his opinion of a situation, a quite reasonable opinion I might add, and then condemned outright, stating it's the same answer every cop would given and assumed why he has given. It couldn't possibly be simply his own opinion in the matter, could it?
If you don't understand how that is stereotyping, how that is hypocrisy, then buy a dictionary.
Yes, that's what people do when they are mistaken. Curious why you called it backtracking tho.And a simple search will show how you've accused Skizzo of blindly defending a cop and then for you to backtrack when he has pointed you in the direction of a post when he's don't quite the opposite.
Fcuk me I just read this again. You know how funny it is you writing that in this thread? Think about itbut starting with the assumption the police officer will do something wrong or is a bad apple is not the way to do it, especially when you are expecting the officer to have a similarly unbiased view on, say, you as a black man
You still don't get it do you? Yes, cops will on occasion defend cops, more often than they should, but assuming every cop is defending another cop when they make comments on particular instances is prejudicial. How can you not get this!?I'll own that one then, cops defend other cops. Controversial I know. Nobodies ever heard that before... Regardless you can call it a prejudice then, one that you can easily dispel mind, just by opening your mouth.
As we are doing false equivalence here that other stereotype that you mention. What's that based on? How does that manifest itself? Do people die as a result of it? Maybe not so equivalent....
Just to put this to bed, when I asked the cops to comment it was with an opened mind, I half assumed that would be the answer (whatever the reason), call that what you want I don't really care. I think there's no longer any reason to continue as unless @choiboyx012 come in with a different line of conversation this has run it's course. It's like nearly a page of back and forths for a poster saying 'haha I knew it' to another poster... @Duafc point being that he thinks the thread is pointless now and yours that you think I'm a hypocrite.
Yes, that's what people do when they are mistaken. Curious why you called it backtracking tho.
Fcuk me I just read this again. You know how funny it is you writing that in this thread? Think about it
I could explain it but I don't think I have to...