Grinner
Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Deadly weapons = Tazers, BB Guns, Toy Guns, Swearwords, etc. Punishable by death....
The gun in question
Deadly weapons = Tazers, BB Guns, Toy Guns, Swearwords, etc. Punishable by death....
I know what BB guns & toy guns look like. In America they can get ya killed, problem wouldn't you say?
The gun in question
I know what BB guns & toy guns look like. In America they can get ya killed, problem wouldn't you say?
I asked you earlier if you watched the video that @Suedesi posted, you never responded but in one of them you will see that often police lack the training to deal with these situations in a way that minimises the risk of loss of life....
Distance, time, cover...
If you have that on your person in America you'll end up dead. No questions asked.
The gun in question
I'm seeing a person with a mind that's made up that won't even watch a ~10 minute video to challenge his mindset... I could be wrong. For now I'll assume that I am not.They looked well trained here. No sense risking your own life for a madman waving a gun at other people.
I'm seeing a person with a mind that's made up that won't even watch ~10 minute video to challenge his mindset... I could be wrong. For now I'll assume that I am not.
Would you engage a nutter with a gun with a smile and a handshake? I doubt you'd last long as a cop in the US with that sort of approach to the job.
[inserts images of lockdown protesters with high powered weaponry and body armour]If you have that on your person in America you'll end up dead. No questions asked.
Shoot first asks questions later.
Your stupid to have them in public.
Would you engage a nutter with a gun with a smile and a handshake? I doubt you'd last long as a cop in the US with that sort of approach to the job.
Think of the phone call that woman in the park made about the black bird watcher.[inserts images of lockdown protesters with high powered weaponry and body armour]
But yes @arnie_ni, you're mostly correct...
Some of y'all could do with watching that video though (no offense).Think of the phone call that woman in the park made about the black bird watcher.
Id imagine someone made a similar call about this homeless guy said he has a gun etc etc and thats why they sent the guys trained to kill and just not the closest patrol car.
He probably had the gun to scare of people from attacking and beating him, for his own protection.
Some of y'all could do with watching that video though (no offense).
Proper preparation for the encounter would have probably saved that guys life (because as you say, they were probably informed of an armed man).
I'm no PO but based on what the guy was saying they could have approached from distance using cover and spoke to the homeless guy trying to deescalate and get him to dispose of the "weapon". Being that they were at a distance and behind cover they would appear less threatening, they would be more assured in their actions due to lower threat (nobody was in any immediate danger), and if (as I mentioned in an earlier post) they had a non lethal option they could have used that first to incapacitate him...
To me, the life of a suspect just doesn't seem to be a consideration. Some of the reactions & responses in this thread reinforce that feeling...
Thats all well and good, but if that was the intention that unit wouldnt have been sent.Some of y'all could do with watching that video though (no offense).
Proper preparation for the encounter would have probably saved that guys life (because as you say, they were probably informed of an armed man).
I'm no PO but based on what the guy was saying they could have approached from distance using cover and spoke to the homeless guy trying to deescalate and get him to dispose of the "weapon". Being that they were at a distance and behind cover they would appear less threatening, they would be more assured in their actions due to lower threat (nobody was in any immediate danger), and if (as I mentioned in an earlier post) they had a non lethal option they could have used that first to incapacitate him...
To me, the life of a suspect just doesn't seem to be a consideration. Some of the reactions & responses in this thread reinforce that feeling...
Thats all well and good, but if that was the intention that unit wouldnt have been sent.
They likely got an active shooter type call and the aim was to neutralise the target.
My point being, i dont think its those individual cops fault, its the system.
They done what they were sent to do
They're not hitmen though are they? They're still cops, sent to 'protect and serve'. I get what you mean though...Thats all well and good, but if that was the intention that unit wouldnt have been sent.
They likely got an active shooter type call and the aim was to neutralise the target.
My point being, i dont think its those individual cops fault, its the system.
They done what they were sent to do
Pointless. Itl be the same guys apply.Thanks for understanding the need for US policing to be dismantled and replaced.
Some of y'all could do with watching that video though (no offense).
Proper preparation for the encounter would have probably saved that guys life (because as you say, they were probably informed of an armed man).
I'm no PO but based on what the guy was saying they could have approached from distance using cover and spoke to the homeless guy trying to deescalate and get him to dispose of the "weapon". Being that they were at a distance and behind cover they would appear less threatening, they would be more assured in their actions due to lower threat (nobody was in any immediate danger), and if (as I mentioned in an earlier post) they had a non lethal option they could have used that first to incapacitate him...
To me, the life of a suspect just doesn't seem to be a consideration. Some of the reactions & responses in this thread reinforce that feeling...
Why?They did use the non-lethal option. Problem is half a second later the rest of them used their lethal options.
Pointless. Itl be the same guys apply.
It needs restructured with severe penalties for overstepping the line.
It needs a culture change.
They done what your talking about in northern ireland.
Dismantled and replaced the RUC with PSNI but apart from those close to retirement age everyone was rehired is how I understand it went
It’s called “sympathetic fire“ or contagious shooting where one starts shooting instinctively at a target when others do. Which is why if you’re using the less-lethal (taser, 40mm launcher/rubber rounds) you’re supposed to yell out to your team “less lethal, less lethal!” Or “taser, taser” etc before you actually fire, to prevent the sound triggering other officers with guns to start shooting.Why?
It’s called “sympathetic fire“ or contagious shooting where one starts shooting instinctively at a target when others do. Which is why if you’re using the less-lethal (taser, 40mm launcher/rubber rounds) you’re supposed to yell out to your team “less lethal, less lethal!” Or “taser, taser” etc before you actually fire, to prevent the sound triggering other officers with guns to start shooting.
Cheers, thought so.It’s called “sympathetic fire“ or contagious shooting where one starts shooting instinctively at a target when others do. Which is why if you’re using the less-lethal (taser, 40mm launcher/rubber rounds) you’re supposed to yell out to your team “less lethal, less lethal!” Or “taser, taser” etc before you actually fire, to prevent the sound triggering other officers with guns to start shooting.
Don't forget cellphones, if you have one of these in the dark you are done.Deadly weapons = Tazers, BB Guns, Toy Guns, Swearwords, etc. Punishable by death....
But every person doesn't have a gun and that's the point people are making about policing. Let's not forget the shoot out on a highway when police were using civilian filled vehicles as a shield. They are not up against paramilitaries over here, they shouldn't be acting like a military force. They are poorly recruited and trained and without a full 180 in their mentality it will not end well for this country.Based on how they approached and in what numbers i presume that they had a call about armed man.
They warned him couple of times and he didn't listen and then reached for his "gun". What should have they do there? Wait that he fires first? They don't know that it is bb gun.
On the other hand, this frontal approach was bad. They could and should have catch him by surprise and cuff him before he even realise what is happening there.
There is pretty simple solution for all these shooting in America. Gun control. There is no coincidence that Europe has dozen times less killings than USA. Because Europe countries have strict gun control. Cops behave like cowboys there because they know that every person can have a gun.
Watch that video yet?Bunch of supercops posting here who are prepared to confront an armed nutcase with no worry for their own or their colleague's safety.
They're also poorly paid and poorly treated. I'm not sure how you recruit better, when as soon as a recruit is given their badge they're treated as 'one of them.' That's not a criticism of your post by the way, just an observation.But every person doesn't have a gun and that's the point people are making about policing. Let's not forget the shoot out on a highway when police were using civilian filled vehicles as a shield. They are not up against paramilitaries over here, they shouldn't be acting like a military force. They are poorly recruited and trained and without a full 180 in their mentality it will not end well for this country.
Bunch of supercops posting here who are prepared to confront an armed nutcase with no worry for their own or their colleague's safety.
You would not, I would not. But is their job to handle these situations correctly. Policemen are supposed to be trained to assess and act accordingly. It might happen by accident a few times, but it seems to be the norm
The problem it might be that the training is shit and an average of 21 weeks and specially, they are not afraid of the consequences so they go with full force
You can't measure a policeman supposed skills and professionalism to a normal person. They are suppose to be better in these situations as they are trained and PAID for it
Depending where you are and the overtime. Let's not pretend they need a 2nd job at McDonald's. Look at the training time for police in this country compared to others, it's a joke. Regarding the "one of them", some of the testimonials from police I've read who have actually done the right thing are shocking.They're also poorly paid and poorly treated. I'm not sure how you recruit better, when as soon as a recruit is given their badge they're treated as 'one of them.' That's not a criticism of your post by the way, just an observation.
It’s notable in this regard that one of Donald’s first Executive Orders was to peel back restrictions on people with a history of serious mental illness purchasing guns.It's society's failing that there are mentally ill people with guns out there. Asking cops to fix that is ridiculous.
Do you think police forces around the country have enough power to send this problem back to where it rightly should be? It would certainly go a long way in rebuilding community trust if they were to collectively advocate for proper facilities and treatment for mental illness.It's society's failing that there are mentally ill people with guns out there. Asking cops to fix that is ridiculous.
Bunch of supercops posting here who are prepared to confront an armed nutcase with no worry for their own or their colleague's safety.
It's society's failing that there are mentally ill people with guns out there. Asking cops to fix that is ridiculous.
Not at all, but then again, most jobs don't come with a very real possibility of getting assaulted or shot at. When you consider the absolute shit they have to deal with on a daily basis, they're hardly well rewarded. It's small wonder the level of some applicants isn't particularly high.Depending where you are and the overtime. Let's not pretend they need a 2nd job at McDonald's. Look at the training time for police in this country compared to others, it's a joke. Regarding the "one of them", some of the testimonials from police I've read who have actually done the right thing are shocking.
Not at all, but then again, most jobs don't come with a very real possibility of getting assaulted or shot at. When you consider the absolute shit they have to deal with on a daily basis, they're hardly well rewarded. It's small wonder the level of some applicants isn't particularly high.
Same DA is pushing ahead with the murder charge