Neil_Buchanan
Cock'd
‘We burned through cash, you can’t see where that billion pound has been spent’
It seems there's a bit of a divide in the reporting - possibly indicating a struggle between EtH and the board.
The Dutch journo (who I assume is Ten Hag's mouthpiece) saying we intend to sign both Gakpo and Anthony...
...and The Telegraph (possibly briefed by the club) saying it's one or the other.
I'm swaying more towards The Telegraph - I think the notion of signing both is wishful thinking on the manager's part.
He could turn out to be a master stroke who knows . Didn't he win player of the year last year ? Hopefully he is a real find
Good point. Actually in his first pre-season with us Van Gaal started playing Memphis as a 10 which nobody understood. And after his poor start in the PL he did well in one game against Watford (?) around mid season playing up front, which seemed far more natural for him than dribbling from the wing.
This could be the case as well, and Gakpo has played through the middle already with the dutch NT so it wouldn't be the biggest of shocks to see this conversion.
That's a bizarre take. Amad has bags of skill and technique but lacks physicality and speed. Gakpo is pretty close to the opposite of that.Can’t say I’m overwhelmed. He looks similar to Amad, who we spent 37m on and was never seen or heard from again.
Thanks. My mistake thought I read in here he did. Still people who watch the Eredivisie seen to rate him highly enough.No, Timber won that award.
Can’t say I’m overwhelmed. He looks similar to Amad, who we spent 37m on and was never seen or heard from again.
No, Timber won that award.
You were right- Gakpo won thatI also thought Gakpo was player of the year.
Where are we getting that from?
Was he young player of the year or something?
I'm starting to like the idea of signing Gakpo the more I look at it, the problem I see here is that we're limiting ourselves here by chosing our targets from a really small circle. This would be like Pep going to City and mainly targeting players who were developed in La Masia, it would be ridiculous when there's amazing talents all around the world.Adding a talented young player to the United team is never horrible news
Adding a talented young player to the United team is never horrible news
Looks nothing like Amad. Gakpo is over 6 foot and quite fast. Physically there is a big difference.Can’t say I’m overwhelmed. He looks similar to Amad, who we spent 37m on and was never seen or heard from again.
Thanks. My mistake thought I read in here he did. Still people who watch the Eredivisie seen to rate him highly enough.
I also thought Gakpo was player of the year.
Where are we getting that from?
Was he young player of the year or something?
That's interesting. So it's obviously not his main position but not something unknown for him either.He's also played up front for PSV, he doesn't ALWAYS play on the left. On occasions, they played a front two, with Goetze in behind them.
He has played 7 games as a striker in his career and he is 23. He has played the rest of the games as a LF/LW. If he can’t make it as a winger what makes you think he is going to make it as a striker?I think he won't make it in the PL as a winger. I could see him as a striker.
‘We burned through cash, you can’t see where that billion pound has been spent’
He has played 7 games as a striker in his career and he is 23. He has played the rest of the games as a LF/LW. If he can’t make it as a winger what makes you think he is going to make it as a striker?
What similarities do you see?Can’t say I’m overwhelmed. He looks similar to Amad, who we spent 37m on and was never seen or heard from again.
I still get Dutch league PTSD from Afonso Alves and he didn’t even play for us.
Horrible news to wake up to. This is just throwing money away. With that money we could have signed a bloody right back, a keeper, at least someone of bigger need. This is insanity.
Never seen him play, at least not knowingly.What do you think of Anthony?
Looks nothing like Amad. Gakpo is over 6 foot and quite fast. Physically there is a big difference.
That's a bizarre take. Amad has bags of skill and technique but lacks physicality and speed. Gakpo is pretty close to the opposite of that.
Also we haven't spent £37m on him, much of that was add ons that I assume haven't been triggered.
Maybe looks like was the wrong choice of words. I have no idea about either of them beyond YouTube clips, I barely even know what Amad does and he’s played for us for 2 years. I meant more in terms of the type of deal this is. Do we really need another raw youngster that we’re going to loan out for a few years before we see any benefit? If he’s good enough to go into the team now then fair enough, but if we’re short on cash we should be focusing it on someone for this season.What similarities do you see?
Gakpo is 23.Do we really need another raw youngster that we’re going to loan out for a few years before we see any benefit?
Do you think he’d come in and improve us right away?Gakpo is 23.
No, I don't. Although anyone on the left would be an improvement on what Rashford is giving us right now. If we were going to sign him, I'd want us to try and develop him as a centre forward. Either way, he's not an 18/19 year old kid that we would be shipping out on loan.Do you think he’d come in and improve us right away?
So why are we signing him then? If he isn’t good enough for now, are we hoping that he’s one for the future? Because I just come back to my point about Amad. Or are we just padding out the squad?No, I don't. Although anyone on the left would be an improvement on what Rashford is giving us right now. If we were going to sign him, I'd want us to try and develop him as a centre forward. Either way, he's not an 18/19 year old kid that we would be shipping out on loan.
I think he is probably better than current Rashford but would hope we could develop him into a strikerSo why are we signing him then? If he isn’t good enough for now, are we hoping that he’s one for the future? Because I just come back to my point about Amad. Or are we just padding out the squad?
Go back to sleep then.Horrible news to wake up to. This is just throwing money away. With that money we could have signed a bloody right back, a keeper, at least someone of bigger need. This is insanity.
He’s absolutely nothing like Amad.Can’t say I’m overwhelmed. He looks similar to Amad, who we spent 37m on and was never seen or heard from again.
To be honest mate, no idea. I can see a potentially good striker in him, but that's pie in the sky stuff really as he's played 90% of his games on the left. He's definitely going to get plenty of games for us right now, but I think our priority should be a right sided attacker. Unless of course he will transition to striker and compete with Martial should Ronaldo leave. Alternatively, Rashford could depart in the next year and Gakpo could be seen as his successor. In my opinion he looks like a striker playing out wide and centre forward is where he has more of a chance of making it here, but possibly only as a second choice.So why are we signing him then? If he isn’t good enough for now, are we hoping that he’s one for the future? Because I just come back to my point about Amad. Or are we just padding out the squad?
Maybe we are converting him to a striker then, we haven’t really been linked with any centre forwards yet we’re apparently after Gakpo and Anthony.To be honest mate, no idea. I can see a potentially good striker in him, but that's pie in the sky stuff really as he's played 90% of his games on the left. He's definitely going to get plenty of games for us right now, but I think our priority should be a right sided attacker. Unless of course he will transition to striker and compete with Martial should Ronaldo leave. Alternatively, Rashford could depart in the next year and Gakpo could be seen as his successor. In my opinion he looks like a striker playing out wide and centre forward is where he has more of a chance of making it here, but possibly only as a second choice.
It doesn’t make sense going for one or the other though.It seems there's a bit of a divide in the reporting - possibly indicating a struggle between EtH and the board.
The Dutch journo (who I assume is Ten Hag's mouthpiece) saying we intend to sign both Gakpo and Anthony...
...and The Telegraph (possibly briefed by the club) saying it's one or the other.
I'm swaying more towards The Telegraph - I think the notion of signing both is wishful thinking on the manager's part.