COD 5: World at War

Call of duty 4 is way better than this in every aspect of the game. Accept for co op but that stoped achivements and story line anyway which seems worthless and pointless. Why go backwards? poor compared to COD 4.
 
Sod single player, multiplayer is where it's at

and COd5 is very similar to COD4, with some added things such as tanks and dogs...I'm not sure if this adds or takes away from multiplayer yet tbh...the dogs are a bit annoying. The guns aren't as good but I kind of got more satisfaction when I killed someone. I prefer the multiplayer maps, thus far, but that might be because they're new and different to the ones I've been playing for a year.

Great game.
 
It's the same as COD4, just back to WW2.

COD4 was outstanding with that Pripyat sniper mission, seems WaW has tried to better it but it fails. Hopefully something great will turn up later in the game. Otherwise pretty standard COD stuff, decent fun, trying to rush through it because I'm going to start a new game of Stalker soon
 
UBERScholes said:
It's the same as COD4, just back to WW2.

COD4 was outstanding with that Pripyat sniper mission, seems WaW has tried to better it but it fails. Hopefully something great will turn up later in the game. Otherwise pretty standard COD stuff, decent fun, trying to rush through it because I'm going to start a new game of Stalker soon
Click to expand...

The new games sniper mission had so much potential even though the start was a complete Enemy at the Gates rip, when you take down the other sniper it just becomes a standard mission basically.
 
What a great sunday morning mother just said to me I got you a game for christmas.I said what is it,only that game world at war or soming :lol: sweeet needless to say I begged her to let me have it now and give Her the money for it.Get me anything else I dont care socks etc.
 
Good game....nothing great though

Also there are some graphics issues with SLi...can be fixed though if you just use one card
 
Borrowed it off a mate, good game. Nazi Zombies is fun online :lol:
 
massey said:
What a great sunday morning mother just said to me I got you a game for christmas.I said what is it,only that game world at war or soming :lol: sweeet needless to say I begged her to let me have it now and give Her the money for it.Get me anything else I dont care socks etc.
Click to expand...

So basically you just bought yourself of a copy of COD5, and the talk of Christmas is irrelevant...
 
Is it just me or are COD4 graphics slightly better? hmm can't really get into it as much as COD4 so far....mind you, I've just bought it and just tried it....
 
i like both i took a while to adjust to 5 and the guns were obviously going to be worse but they arent bad.
the dogs are a welcome addition as they provide a great distraction and help you get your kills up
 
I played the hell out of COD4, and I personally find World At War to be a fantastic game. I try not to compare the two, because as with everything there will be things you like and don't like when comparing things.

I think it's being severely underrated as a game due to the comparison with COD4; and like I said earlier - if it was released as a standalone game it would be one of the best Multiplayer FPS games released. Ever.
 
WeasteDevil said:
COD: WaW runs on the same engine as COD4, the only difference here is the gameplay programming, design, and the art.
Click to expand...

Well it really is very little if none at all improvment graphics wise.

For an FPS, the game is very good but then so was Modern Warfare.

World at War is basically COD4 with different weapons and different gameplay from time to time.

Still good enough to keep me interested but theres nothing that stands out over Modern Warfare
 
I used to be amazing at Goldeneye (anyone remember that classic on the N64?)

But Im gonna need a lot more games to get my match fitness back up, COD5 match fitness that is.

Im literally shit, so far.

Anyway, my tags Abz_Kwt, hit me up if you like :)
 
DC1878 said:
That was awesome

I remember that cheat where you could turn them into migets with massive heads, and fire paint balls.
Click to expand...

Remember Oddjob? :lol:

I used to love the DB90, is that what its called? The silver gun .. Argh, cant remember..

Anyway, nothing beats the Golden Gun, one shot kills
 
Q80 said:
Remember Oddjob? :lol:

I used to love the DB90, is that what its called? The silver gun .. Argh, cant remember..

Anyway, nothing beats the Golden Gun, one shot kills
Click to expand...

Haha yeah

I don't really remember much, but it was epic

I felt invincible with two golden guns :devil:
 
Stemmy said:
Well it really is very little if none at all improvment graphics wise.

For an FPS, the game is very good but then so was Modern Warfare.

World at War is basically COD4 with different weapons and different gameplay from time to time.

Still good enough to keep me interested but theres nothing that stands out over Modern Warfare
Click to expand...

You need a bit of Killzone 2. ;)
 
Member 5225 said:
just more, I don't know, 'crisp' on COD4 maybe?
Maybe I need some more gametime on COD5
Click to expand...

Well it's a totally different development team, so it's not going to look the same, especially when they have totally changed the setting. They may have had different goals than Infinity Ward had in terms of design. It's also not a main COD title, it's not COD5, you will get that next year from Infinity Ward.
 
ohhhh really, i did NOT know that, what is point of that...yeah am gonna give the story-mode a go, but I ain't holding my breath....infact I switched back to COD4 again...:nervous:
 
its harder to kill than in cod4....must be the damn inaccurate weapons.
 
i hate the fecking japs :mad:

the story of the game should have been in europe against nazi germany.
 
for some unknown reason call of duty 2 never ran on my older p4
 
"They have released the dogs"

Got bored of this online, gone back to COD4 online.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.