Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the Elliot angle is just a way to push for more money, personally.

However, it'll be typical Glazer to expand one part of the stadium to get additional revenue without doing anything about the rest.

We'd be consigned to also -runs, so I bloody hope it's just bargaining
 
What about it is new or revelatory in any way?

Glazers can upgrade the stadium for ~200m and Elliott became more serious about investing after looking at the books because they liked what they saw.

So there's a clear pathway for the Glazers to stay now. Previously it was thought they'd have to sell because they couldn't find a way to afford the upgrade of the stadium. Doesn't look to be the case anymore.
 
Glazers can upgrade the stadium for ~200m and Elliott became more serious about investing after looking at the books because they liked what they saw.

So there's a clear pathway for the Glazers to stay now. Previously it was thought they'd have to sell because they couldn't find a way to afford the upgrade of the stadium. Doesn't look to be the case anymore.
Literally a rehash of old news in an opinion piece.

It's nothing noteworthy.
 
Glazers can upgrade the stadium for ~200m and Elliott became more serious about investing after looking at the books because they liked what they saw.

So there's a clear pathway for the Glazers to stay now. Previously it was thought they'd have to sell because they couldn't find a way to afford the upgrade of the stadium. Doesn't look to be the case anymore.


So there wasn't an option just to expand the South Stand before and leave the rest? They could've gone for that option but to instead had plans drawn up for a full renovation.
 
Glazers can upgrade the stadium for ~200m and Elliott became more serious about investing after looking at the books because they liked what they saw.

So there's a clear pathway for the Glazers to stay now. Previously it was thought they'd have to sell because they couldn't find a way to afford the upgrade of the stadium. Doesn't look to be the case anymore.


But four of them don't want to stay.
 


Is this a rule or they are just making things up?

“Manchester United have secured their place in next season’s Champions League by finishing the season third in the Premier League, after Ligue 1 surprise package, Nice, lost their grip on third place as they slumped to a 29-0 home defeat to Grenoble, a result which featured no less than 27 own goals by Nice players, slightly above the statistical norm. Sir Jim Ratcliffe showed his displeasure by doing doughnuts above the stadium in his helicopter immediately after the final whistle.”
 
So there wasn't an option just to expand the South Stand before and leave the rest? They could've gone for that option but to instead had plans drawn up for a full renovation.

Yes. There’s a clear pathway now. Didn’t you hear the man? It all makes perfect sense…
 
It seems you don't quite get my post, the process will know more than i will ever know. It's not the whole point, that has been dismissed given there is already owners of multiple clubs. Not to worry if INEO owns 3 clubs. Better 3 than 2 right?

What has INEOS got to do.with Qatsri state involvement? The simple fact is that Qatar wouldn't be allowed to.buy United if they admit that the state is the buyer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.