Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
It could also be him lulling other bidders into a false sense of security ’poor little Jim, can’t pony up enough dough!’ only to slap 6b large on the table, drop the mic and walk away with the keys to OT! :lol:

I’ve got a really nice bridge for sale if you’re interested?
 
He’s already said INEOS will pay off the glazer debt and there will be ‘no new debt’ on the club. What more do you need to know?

This is pretty iffy -- what I'd like to know is how much of the club's revenue will be dedicated to things like dividends, paying off debts (regardless of who incurs it: INEOS or the club). I trust the accountants are smart enough to figure out a way to get a subsidiary to pay a parent company's debts so I don't trust the INEOS will take on debt statement at all.

If it's zero - I'm all for the Ratcliffe bid. I think he's still hiding behind "no new debt", "INEOS will be taking debt" etc without specifically saying how much money he plans to pull out of the club. What I really want is a concrete statement like all of the club's revenues will be spent on improving the club instead of servicing debts or paying dividends.
 
The hedge funds learned from the rickets and Chelsea. There will be no fan protests this time, the vile hedge funds and consortiums will remain silent unless a deal is signed. If they do get a deal they will probably bring Ratcliffe in to front it.
 
This is pretty iffy -- what I'd like to know is how much of the club's revenue will be dedicated to things like dividends, paying off debts (regardless of who incurs it: INEOS or the club).

If it's zero - I'm all for the Ratcliffe bid. I think he's still hiding behind "no new debt", "INEOS will be taking debt" etc without specifically saying how much money he plans to pull out of the club.
Read the telegraph piece. He has said he doesn’t see United as a financial asset - he doesn’t want dividends. He will take nothing out!
 
Whoever does PR for Ineos is pretty medicore at their job. At the start of this process half the fan base was begging him to make a bid, every word they have leaked since has made them look like the second best bid

Was probably Dave Brailsford "Listen boys this is how you do PR" :lol:
 
I find it odd that there are apparently other interested parties other than Qataris, SJR and Elliot group.

All three have been documented visiting OT but yet we’re to believe other potential buyers are slipping in and out without being seen?

It would seem to me that it’s now just between Qataris and SJR, whoever offers the best package.

This leads to another question about how much 100% ownership really is? Is it just the 100% Glazer shares for sale? What if other shareholders don’t want to sell?

Aha!
 
Here we go?



I actually despise this journalist all the way back from his ESPN transfer nonsense. How is he in his position? I can’t even remember a time he broke a story!

How does he go from making the point that Raine can’t sell a 100%, and then go on to say INEOS wants buy 100%. I know he means eventually, but he is just word smithing.

How is debt not an issue? Like who would say such a thing if INEOS are going to keep the existing debt?

Journalists that have agendas are the worst.
 
Here we go?



If the bid is really from Qatar and Jassim is just a front as he claims (And anyone with half a brain knows) then his argument about Ineos having more Football expertise doesn't make sense. That is to say he doesn't make sense, but that's hardly new for him.
 
With all these different different stories coming out, it seems as though the end game is nearly here.
 
I actually despise this journalist all the way back from his ESPN transfer nonsense. How is he in his position? I can’t even remember a time he broke a story!

How does he go from making the point that Raine can’t sell a 100%, and then go on to say INEOS wants buy 100%. I know he means eventually, but he is just word smithing.

How is debt not an issue? Like who would say such a thing if INEOS are going to keep the existing debt?

Journalists that have agendas are the worst.
There is a difference between buying 100% of the club, and having 100% control. It’s a clumsily worded attempt at saying both bids are for the same portion of the club - ie the 69% owner by the Glazers.

Also, it’s been done to death but INEOS are NOT going to keep the existing debt. It‘s not contractually possible.
 
Can’t believe some of these stories. Raine said they wanted firm bids by Wednesday after the OT visits and access to detailed financial information. Now we are being told that maybe 5 new bidders will be invited to OT next week. As I understood it, sometime after Wednesday, Raine will declare the preferred bidder. There will then be a period of negotiation with that bidder to refine the clauses of the deal and try to improve the price.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.