red thru&thru
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2004
- Messages
- 7,657
Again, I'll reference the Chris Rock Outrage film for this thread. Quite apt really.
Imagine laughing at someone protesting against human rights abuse. Football does strange things to people.
Imagine laughing at someone protesting against human rights abuse. Football does strange things to people.
Imagine laughing at someone protesting against human rights abuse. Football does strange things to people.
Can we like fix the toilets first?
I don’t think anyone is laughing at them for protesting, more the initial teeing it up that they would be “unfurling a banner” which conjures an image of something fairly large not a piece of A2 paper the likes of which is usually used by kids asking their favourite player for their shirt.
I’d argue speaking for United fans is a bit much though? Let United fans take that stepIt was a puny banner, alright.
But make no mistake about it, people are indeed belittling the effort itself (too). And, to be clear, that would mean that they belittle/ridicule Amnesty's concerns about United being purchased by Qatar. Not random "activist" protesters, but Amnesty.
Again, to be clear about this.
I don’t think anyone is laughing at them for protesting, more the initial teeing it up that they would be “unfurling a banner” which conjures an image of something fairly large not a piece of A2 paper the likes of which is usually used by kids asking their favourite player for their shirt.
Selective outrage is rampant in this thread.Again, I'll reference the Chris Rock Outrage film for this thread. Quite apt really.
Well that’s hardly the protestors fault, it’s a bbc report. I doubt security would let in a giant banner covering a block of seats. There is basically a full page of posters mocking the protest, one even saying “down with this sort of thing”, which I can only assume is regarding the protesting of Qatari owners.
Probably would have made more sense sitting in the north stand though if they wanted it to get on tv.
And people think Glazers will stay.
I mean the “down with this sort of thing” comment seems another clear example of mocking the size of the sign, given the origin of that meme.
Agreed. However, the overall sentiment of the club will lose value if they stay is true.To be fair that last line is simply made up
I’d argue speaking for United fans is a bit much though? Let United fans take that step
The decision about whether this type of takeover will be allowed to pass was taken decades ago. “Football” has already made its choice - a World Cup was quite literally hosted in Qatar mere months ago. You either throw all state linked clubs out and block this deal or you allow it - you can’t block this one in isolation.The hypocrisy of some United fans on this issue has been quite something to behold. Not directed at you specifically, but some on this forum have even admitted, with no sense of shame, to just a matter of months ago being ardent critics of the ownership models at City/PSG and the World Cup in Qatar, only to abandon their morals at the mere hint of a Qatari takeover of United.
I don't think United fans can really be relied upon to be objective here - human rights organisations that want to raise concerns or even block this potential takeover will undoubtedly take matters in to their own hands and I expect the noise around this issue to grow far greater, if the Glazers move in to due diligence with the Qataris in the weeks ahead. When deciding whether or not to allow a prospective Qatari takeover to pass, the relevant football authorities must consider what is best for football rather than what best furthers the narrow economic interests of Manchester United. It is to those authorities that the groups hoping to scupper this deal, will ultimately be appealing.
Selective outrage is rampant in this thread.
The hypocrisy of some United fans on this issue has been quite something to behold. Not directed at you specifically, but some on this forum have even admitted, with no sense of shame, to just a matter of months ago being ardent critics of the ownership models at City/PSG and the World Cup in Qatar, only to abandon their morals at the mere hint of a Qatari takeover of United.
I don't think United fans can really be relied upon to be objective here - human rights organisations that want to raise concerns or even block this potential takeover will undoubtedly take matters in to their own hands and I expect the noise around this issue to grow far greater, if the Glazers move in to due diligence with the Qataris in the weeks ahead. When deciding whether or not to allow a prospective Qatari takeover to pass, the relevant football authorities must consider what is best for football rather than what best furthers the narrow economic interests of Manchester United. It is to those authorities that the groups hoping to scupper this deal, will ultimately be appealing.
Oh fair. Haven’t watched that show so didn’t have a clue about that meme, hold my hands up on that.
I’d be surprised if any of the posters “mocking the size of the sign” also support the general gist of the protest, I would imagine they are all pro Qatar taking over. You only have to click on the tweet to see half the people replying have Qatar flags in their names.
I'm against state ownership Qatari or otherwise but I don't see how they could block it on those grounds when 2 PL clubs are already owned by Gulf states.
100%. I almost posted as I was watching it live.Again, I'll reference the Chris Rock Outrage film for this thread. Quite apt really.
I would hope so seeing as the UK government had a big hand in founding the state and handing control to the biggest tribe. The least they can do is invest.Yep. And especially as the UK government receives so much investment from Qatar.
Buying Manchester United is beyond just sport at this moment in time.
It means something when it's followed by demands others share in the outrage and a condemnation when they dontFIY all outrage is selective. It's a meaningless term.
I’d argue speaking for United fans is a bit much though? Let United fans take that step
It means something when it's followed by demands others share in the outrage and a condemnation when they dont
Very enlightening thank you but that's beside the point I was making.It's meaningless in any context. Not one person in the history of the world has been outraged at every single injustice in the world. So everyone is selectively outraged at they're aware of and/or what's important to them
Any larger and it would've been confiscated. It achieved its purpose by making headlines.I don’t think anyone is laughing at them for protesting, more the initial teeing it up that they would be “unfurling a banner” which conjures an image of something fairly large not a piece of A2 paper the likes of which is usually used by kids asking their favourite player for their shirt.
And the worst part will be seeing the club associated with state ownership.Once Qatar finally buys us, the best part will be seeing this thread with a padlock on it.
It is to those authorities that the groups hoping to scupper this deal, will ultimately be appealing.
The quiet before the storm?
Yes I think there is a perfect storm brewing.It has been quiet, hasn't it? I just hope Jassim (or whoever it is) has flown into the UK ant takeover talks have started.
It has been quiet, hasn't it? I just hope Jassim (or whoever it is) has flown into the UK ant takeover talks have started.
I think unfurling a banner and it ends up being that is worth ridicule. They’ve obviously notified the press since news came out hours before and that was it.By all means, I hope they (ordinary fans at OT) do.
It says something, though - does it not - that:
a) Amnesty protests against Qatari ownership at Old Trafford
and
b) United fans on here ridicule it
No?
So Qatar are allowed to own one of the most iconic buildings in the capital, the most famous British department store, be the biggest shareholder in the biggest airport, etc etc, but a line needs to be drawn when it comes to a football club; especially with another 2 football clubs owned by other ME states.The hypocrisy of some United fans on this issue has been quite something to behold. Not directed at you specifically, but some on this forum have even admitted, with no sense of shame, to just a matter of months ago being ardent critics of the ownership models at City/PSG and the World Cup in Qatar, only to abandon their morals at the mere hint of a Qatari takeover of United.
I don't think United fans can really be relied upon to be objective here - human rights organisations that want to raise concerns or even block this potential takeover will undoubtedly take matters in to their own hands and I expect the noise around this issue to grow far greater, if the Glazers move in to due diligence with the Qataris in the weeks ahead. When deciding whether or not to allow a prospective Qatari takeover to pass, the relevant football authorities must consider what is best for football rather than what best furthers the narrow economic interests of Manchester United. It is to those authorities that the groups hoping to scupper this deal, will ultimately be appealing.