- Joined
- May 5, 2018
- Messages
- 904
Btw has anyone actually seen this times article yet with Ratcliff’s plans?
That's your own conclusion the reality is in a race between two owners Qatar have from their statements a far more diligent scope when it comes to the magnitude of what's needed for the club to get back to competing on all fronts. When it comes to footballing matters Ratcliffe has too many questionable aspects from the debt all the way to assessing his ownership of Nice going against him. For someone who has shown interest in the club long before a potential sale was announced he's used all the wrong criteria's to signify his intentions. He's underwhelming.
Why are INEOS lying?Ratcliffe team can’t even sell me a lie competently. None of their statements since going public have been good enough.
The problem is even the Glazers sell us better lies…
For me, I need to work out what he wants to achieve. What’s the big picture for SJR? A man of his age, is he trying to secure his families future much like Malcom Glazer did buying Utd?
I clearly understand why Qatar want Utd. Although some won’t agree there is no speculation as to what they want to achieve. Given we know the reason. We also know that the project only works for Qatar if Utd are successful. As a fan, this is the most important thing for me. They bought PSG to secure the WC. It was a success.
With SJR. It’s clear making Nice successful was not the drive behind buying the club. Some may say the idea was that it was always going to be a feeder club for an eventual purchase of a bigger club. That’s a plan. But this latest update fills me with zero confidence they want Utd to be successful.
Even the Glazers getting rid of Woodward and installing a better structure that have bought in ETH is more positive than these updates from SJR camp.
#GlazersOut
For me, I need to work out what he wants to achieve. What’s the big picture for SJR? A man of his age, is he trying to secure his families future much like Malcom Glazer did buying Utd? Each of his children will walk away with a Billion each after living nicely off the club for 17 years. Is this what SJR trying to achieve?
Since the fortunes of Lausanne (who's been a yoyo team at best in the last decade or so) and Nice (second most in-form team in France atm) are so important, surely the fortunes of Malaga must have some interests as well?
Why are INEOS lying?
How can you be sure the Qataris aren’t? We don’t even know who Jassim really is, worryingly nor do his spokespeople.
Why are INEOS lying?
How can you be sure the Qataris aren’t? We don’t even know who Jassim really is, worryingly nor do his spokespeople.
Why would Qatar lie? It’s a sport washing exercise. It defeats the entire purpose not to deliver what they say. We know exactly what their game is, it’s blatantly obvious. It’s ugly and horrific, but what we get is clear.
Don’t know if that sits right with me. At least leave it to United fans to make that move.Rumoured to be Representatives from Qatar at todays game. VERY very loose rumours but still.
Also there will be an anti Qatari flag on display by Amnesty.
Off course when it is united, they will go all they way to carry a baner in the stadium.
Off course when it is united, they will go all they way to carry a baner in the stadium.
Off course when it is united, they will go all they way to carry a baner in the stadium.
Btw has anyone actually seen this times article yet with Ratcliff’s plans?
The banner held in the Palace game was by Palace fans.Think there were banners during the Newcastle games, though the only one I remember from memory was at an away game to palace and it might not have been officially by Amnesty.
Off course when it is united, they will go all they way to carry a baner in the stadium.
I never ever imagined any man Utd fan would prefer the Glazers over any type of ownership. Fair play to you. I respect it. But after 18 years of the Glazers I find it hard how anyone who chose them over anybody.I'd probably prefer Glazers over state ownership, but I don't think I could turn my back on supporting the club it's been 30 fecking years
SJR is the least shit option for me
But I don't think it matters which subgroup are doing it. Banners are just inevitable.The banner held in the Palace game was by Palace fans.
Off course when it is united, they will go all they way to carry a baner in the stadium.
One thing I think is a bit surprising is that the Ineos group’s financials not in any way have been described, or like unveiled. It is a very large group, and there are of course financial reports available for some entities. But they are a bit murky since in this group, you have a lot of Joint Ventures in especially Asia/Middle East. At the top an entity turns over 18bn, while a general claim is that the group turns over 65bn.
What is my point? None really, but if someone asked me how much turnover “Ineos” have, how much profit it makes, what the group’s total indebtness is — I would not know.
Give that Ineos is a private group, more or less owned completely by SJR plus two other founders, they don’t have to produce more info than they do (which is as little as possible).
All that is knows. The group with joint ventures makes 65bn revenues and currently around 2bn profits.
There’s also readily available info re. their debts.
For company with a 65billion revenue, a profit of 2billion is very poor. Like some consumer/retail sector sort of margins.
Well they are attempting to spunk a shit tonne in sports and have made huge investments since 2019.
It’s not poor when it’s 2 bn + company growth.
Dunno. My former employer's topline is around $52billion with $14billion net. They invest a huge portion in R&D and acquisitions every year.
Do they also spunk hundreds of millions on sport? And tens of mils just to get someone to run a marathon under 2 hours for shits and giggles ?
Their 2bn profit by the way is their profit share of joint ventures.
I’ve zero interest debating whether or not INEOS is a good business man, or compare it to your awesome former employer. I’m sure the 3 owners are happy enough taking 2bn a year in profit whilst having a top time in motor sport, sailing, running, rugby & football.
Maybe you should email em and tell em their bottom line is wank and to concentrate on that instead.
Did Jassim and his dad buy Malaga?Since the fortunes of Lausanne (who's been a yoyo team at best in the last decade or so) and Nice (second most in-form team in France atm) are so important, surely the fortunes of Malaga must have some interests as well?
5th position in the French league and you are happy?He took over when they’d finished 8th and 7th the two previous seasons, they look to have a great chance of finishing 5th again for the 3rd time in 4 seasons.
“Can’t run Nice”?
Being slightly ott there?
I don't think there exists a positive description of his football involvement on the internet. Every thing is either describing unprofessional, inexperienced or incompetent.The article below sheds light on some of the dumb moves made by Ratcliffe via Brailsford at Nice. Both Galtier and Favre have been reported to be very disappointed with how Brailsford has overseen recruitment. And one of the dumbest things Brailsford/Ratcliffe did last summer was to hire Iain Moody to oversee the transfer window and he signed players that were incompatible with the positional play principles of Favre who was said to be extremely disappointed with the players that were signed. (And that's without going into Moody being a racist.)
That then created a poor atmosphere in the dressing room due to Favre's frustrations before he was eventually sacked. The new DoF from Lens looks a promising move but his arrival came a little too late for Favre. But it's understandable why the Nice faithful have been critical of the way the club has been run after Ratcliffe made claims about challenging PSG when he first took over. But from reading the article below, it's clear to deduce that Ratcliffe and Brailsford know very little as far as running the structural side of a football club and it would be in their best interests to empower the DoF to make the staffing and structural decisions
The money INEOS has should mean they challenge for champions league places. And if @devilish is correct about Ratcliffe paying the likes of Ramsey 175k a week, then that basically demonstrates that things have been going wrong which are highlighted in the piece below.
Guardian: "Ratcliffe said he wanted to challenge PSG when he bought Nice in 2019. Despite good intentions, he hasn’t even come close"
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/jan/20/manchester-united-fans-nice-jim-ratcliffe-psg
That’s pretty accurate.My 2 favorite examples of mental gymnastics these last few weeks / months have been:
1. Trying to pitch PSG as a well run club () whilst acting like Ratcliffe has made Nice relegation candidates from a team that had a chance of catching up to PSG.
2. Trying to paint Ratcliffe as the most evil billionaire to ever walk the Earth whilst literally twerking for a dictatorship that does way worse stuff on a daily basis.
Embarrassing
Qatar is the best option,at least.That’s pretty accurate.
The Qatar cheerleaders are in full swing these days.