Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Elliot charged 15% on the Milan deal. They would want not just the stadium, but the land on it as collateral.

And they would take it all.


The glazers have no other collateral they could realistically use but the club, and certainly don't have the finances to fun a $2 billion loan themselves.

Precisely. How do you think the previous owners lost AC Milan? It will depend on how optimistic the two bros feel about the future of the club and therefore the value in the future. The other siblings may not be and would prefer the bird in hand. Or they may have cash flow problems themselves.
 
The lengths some of you will go to in here are bizarre. Talk about over analysing every tiny little thing and jumping to the most negative conclusions.

Must be so draining.
 
It's all starting to point towards Glazers staying which means us taking in even more debt.

Load of bollocks if that happens
 
so Elliot loan them money without interest payments?

I'm not sure I follow

Manageable rates for the first few years (in lieu of equity including that of the other siblings); backload it and if they fail.... do what they do best. The ol' sub-prime mortgage approach.
 
as if going to a game of football means they're staying

come on guys wake up

they never go to our fecking games :lol:
 
apologies, I meant why are you sure they aren't selling?

and yes if they get the same in 5 or 10 years as they could now it's a complete disaster and they have lost something

5bn in equity can earn you a couple of billion quite conservatively in five years.. with much lower risk than owning a football club

I very much disagree. 5bn equity can earn your a couple of billion... or can lose you a couple of billion, particularly if you don't have the acumen and the connections of your old man. There's also the volatile nature of the markets at present and the uncertainty of the future. I'd say right now football clubs are a decent, stable place to keep your money, if you've bought them beforehand. Sure, they might not possess explosive growth potential, particularly if the ESL is truly dead, but they also don't have a risk of massive decline either. It's why I think they will hunker down, weather the storm, keep the dividends rolling, and see what happens later on.

That is, of course, unless an extreme offer arrives, but I don't think that is very likely. We've been talking 5bn, but by all accounts they want at least 6bn. It's important to remember they don't need to sell. Maybe the other 4 want to cash out, but they want to cash out for the right fee. So the reason I believe they are staying is that no one will rise to meet their valuation, and unless that happens they have absolutely no reason to sell.
 
Yes…because they leaked it to Keegan. Just like SJR leaked his to the telegraph.

Anyway…is he doing this to improve relations due to them staying, to give impression they don’t have to sell to increase price or because he loves the club and ETH?



Setting season ticket prices...

... attending cup finals...

...all this when he's planning to ride off into the sunset soon..?
 
so Elliot loan them money without interest payments?

I'm not sure I follow

They would own a chunk of the club but would give the voting rights to the two remaining glazer spawn. If the club is ever sold in future at an increased price they get their ROI then
 
I'm pretty much agree



Looks like it’s going to be Glazers with extra debt / investment then.

I wonder if the Qataris will move onto Liverpool now

The only solution for them is an external investment because if they'll try to put more debt(that they already been doing...) on the club - all hell will get loose
 
Last edited:
as if going to a game of football means they're staying

come on guys wake up

they never go to our fecking games :lol:

Devil's advocate -- he rarely shows up. Only costs him $20-40k to show up but it maybe worth a few hundred million in terms of bargaining power.
 
I have no idea how people are drawing a line from them attending this match to it meaning they're staying.

I could just as easily argue that it simply means they've decided to personally attend one last match/final/possible trophy before they sell up and walk away.
 
Depends on if they need 4bn for Avram and Joel to remain in charge. Perhaps 2bn to buys the other siblings out would be enough, if the two remain hardball.

Fact of the matter is there isn’t that many bids for Raine to sift through, and the whole things been on hold up for over a week now. Clearly they’re not just considering selling up completely.
If there's 6 of them and they're wanting 6 billion for the club, that's 1b each.

Why would the other siblings settle for 500m each? it's not happening.
 
No. Based on the NYSE share value, the club's worth 3.4 billion (?). The siblings own 60-70%?

So its like 1.2 billion (paper napkin calculation) to buy out the siblings plus premium.
And why would the other four accept a vastly inferior offer for the benefit of the two remainers? If Joel and Avram decline a reasonable bid, say a £5.5b offer that could come from Qatar, why would the other four make it easy for them after missing out on a big payday?

You seem to forget that, in a split, the other four are more powerful as a joint voting block than Joel and Avram. So if Joel and Avram want to buy them out it would be at seriously generous terms that match the value they would be holding out for. Borrowing £1.2 billion at current rates will cripple the club.
 
I very much disagree. 5bn equity can earn your a couple of billion... or can lose you a couple of billion, particularly if you don't have the acumen and the connections of your old man. There's also the volatile nature of the markets at present and the uncertainty of the future. I'd say right now football clubs are a decent, stable place to keep your money, if you've bought them beforehand. Sure, they might not possess explosive growth potential, particularly if the ESL is truly dead, but they also don't have a risk of massive decline either. It's why I think they will hunker down, weather the storm, keep the dividends rolling, and see what happens later on.

That is, of course, unless and extreme offer arrives, but I don't think that is very likely. We've been talking 5bn, but by all accounts they want at least 6bn. It's important to remember they don't need to sell. Maybe the other 4 want to cash out, but they want to cash out for the right fee. So the reason I believe they are staying is that no one will rise to meet their valuation, and unless that happens they have absolutely no reason to sell.

I just meant index funds, which usually pay a solid 10% pa and they'd obviously be spreading this over several countries, markets and sectors

but anyway, the point is capital is valuable, and having an asset that stagnates is costly in real terms
 
No. Based on the NYSE share value, the club's worth 3.4 billion (?). The siblings own 60-70%?

So its like 1.2 billion (paper napkin calculation) to buy out the siblings plus premium.

I don't see why they'd take that if there's £5 billion on the table, which would mean tens of millions more each for them, they might be family, but I doubt they'd write off this sort of money.

Even if they did then they'd need to borrow £1.2 billio, which they can't leverage agains the club, so that will mean them paying the interest out of their own pockets, or selling a percentage of the club to whoever gives them the money, with them getting their payoff when the club is sold.

Now I'm sure there's some calculations, income projections, etc, that can make that add up somehow, but it's a strech to say the least, and ths before the stadium rebuild comes into, and the fan backlash that will follow.

It's also such a good time to get a return on money, and not a good time to borrow money, so they could feesibly just cash in now and make more than the club value 'might' increase just by putting it in safe investments.

Other than them wanting to stay, and money not been the main overriding motivation, then I don't get it.
 
Not sure I get the logic of how going to a final means they're staying. Pretty easy to spin it the other way and say they want to show they left a team that could win something/on the up.
 
I don't see why they'd take that if there's £5 billion on the table, which would mean tens of millions more each for them, they might be family, but I doubt they'd write off this sort of money.

Even if they did then they'd need to borrow £1.2 billio, which they can't leverage agains the club, so that will mean them paying the interest out of their own pockets, or selling a percentage of the club to whoever gives them the money, with them getting their payoff when the club is sold.

Now I'm sure there's some calculations, income projections, etc, that can make that add up somehow, but it's a strech to say the least, and ths before the stadium rebuild comes into, and the fan backlash that will follow.

It's also such a good time to get a return on money, and not a good time to borrow money, so they could feesibly just cash in now and make more than the club value 'might' increase just by putting it in safe investments.

Other than them wanting to stay, and money not been the main overriding motivation, then I don't get it.

Greed.
 
Precisely. How do you think the previous owners lost AC Milan? It will depend on how optimistic the two bros feel about the future of the club and therefore the value in the future. The other siblings may not be and would prefer the bird in hand. Or they may have cash flow problems themselves.

You ignored the important bit.

The club cannot afford those payments.

The glazers cannot afford those payments.

So where is the loan you think they are getting being funded?
 
They aren't staying ffs. Qatar will buy the club within the next few months. Stop being so paranoid
 
They would own a chunk of the club but would give the voting rights to the two remaining glazer spawn. If the club is ever sold in future at an increased price they get their ROI then

Ah I see. So the shares go Glazer siblings > Elliot, and not Glazer> Glazer.

I don't see this being an attractive proposition for a hedge fund unless they get paid interest on top (eg a convertible debt note). Which leaves the question, who pays for that?
 


Ive seen enough evidence from the past week to have a feeling that they are staying. The season ticket prices, the hiring of a new Director of Operations, Avram talking more about the club this week than the previous 17 years, all the BS about loving the club, the BS about wanting to keep Old Trafford where it is... Also as soon as FSG pulled out of selling Liverpool I thought the Glazers would do the same. I think both sets of owners were seeking investment, Liverpool had zero interest and the Glazers look like they might have secured a few billion.

Its time to accept it I think.

I disagree. But it’s just a hunch. On the other hand, from the point of view of the two siblings determined to hang in there, it might be seen as a smart strategy to invite potential offers, up the share value, and highlight how attractive the Glazers are as custodians besides some of the other horrors that could emerge. As some have rightly pointed out here, there are no particularly great options, at least that we know about. It goes from unspeakable regime ownership, to nasty blood-sucking parasites, to maybe but maybe not.
 
It could equally be them going as a last act before they go.

Plenty of reasons why and they don’t all point to them staying at all.

I just don't think the idea of them wanting to stay is so far out of an idea. Greed blinds people. Plus its Malcolm's gift to them, something emotional.

But my gut is that showing up at Wembley, I suspect is a PR activity to put pressure on the Prince to up his price. 20-30k max cost of going versus an additional few hundred million in negotiation leverage.

Chants of 'cnuts! cnuts! cnuts!' in unison wont bother them for that additional amount of money.

I bet it is timed with the Athletic article too of them doing a U-turn and not wanting to sell out.

They are cnuts but ain't dumb.

If his young kids come along then I would be worried. Then it maybe a sign they are staying.
 
What they said in their initial bid will inform the whole process, if the Glazers found out that they lied they could sue.

What is clear is that Jassim isn't being given the same treatment as Sir Jim. You haven't considered that at one time HBJ's common ancestor with the Emir, be it grandfather or great grandfather, was once an Emir and HBJ, and by extension Jassim, may have inherited some great fortune before HBJ's time in government.

Lets consider Prince Edward's grandson who happens to inherit his dukedom then worked at upper echelons of a corrupt government where he was in control of government funds and how they are invested. For interest sake, lets say when HBJ entered government with the former Emir in 1995 he was already worth millions by virtue of being a descendent of a recent sovereign! Given what is being said of his financial skills and access to corrupt deals can we imagine what he is worth?

For me its not implausible that these guys are worth around $20b to $30b and they are willing to use a third of that to buy into United and raise their profile so as to become too famous to touch for the current Emir. Or they have his blessing but they are doing it for their own family and their interests with the Emir just happen to align, he was reportedly encouraging more forrays of this nature after seeing the impact of the world cup.


Let me preface this by saying I don't for one second believe the Sheikh Jassim bid isn't a state bid.

And yes it's not implausible that HBJ has a vast personal fortune that would allow him to buy United from cash reserves just as its not implausible that he doesn't. No one knows, if it is private and they have the money to do what they promise then despite some reservations I would be ok with their bid and probably prefer it.

All I'm saying is if a United fan truly believes that it's a private takeover bid fair enough. But in that case then they should be asking themselves and others questions about where the funds are coming from and the motivations and long term commitment they will have to owning Man Utd.
 
how much would the siblings need from the Glazer brothers to match the Qatari bid? Also, I watched the first episode of Succession, surely they're just like the Glazer family?
 
Looks like it’s going to be Glazers with extra debt / investment then.

I wonder if the Qataris will move onto Liverpool now
 
There's only one flaw with thinking about this from a business point of view; the Glazers are idiots.
They aren't idiots. They're businessmen with decades of experience and a large combined net worth. They aren't going to behave like cretins and amateurs when conducting business for an asset worth billions
 
I think it's important to make a distinction between the board and football structure when it comes to the management of the club. And I'd like to see the new people within the football structure continue in their roles under new ownership until they prove otherwise.

I think we should expect better, because for one, the new ownership can't possibly be as incompetent as the Glazers. Secondly, they will likely have more capital to invest in the playing squad in comparison, which can only help the existing football structure target their primary goals.
Do you honestly believe Glazers are the most incompetent owners? I strongly disagree on that.

Also, do you think that so far the senior team has not had sufficient investment and capital made available? I am debating whether the capital has been allocated in the best way.
 
They aren't idiots. They're businessmen with decades of experience and a large combined net worth. They aren't going to behave like cretins and amateurs when conducting business for an asset worth billions
They aren't going to drive it into further depth, and have crumbling infrastructure, and turn the once dominant force in British football into a club that have taken a decade to get back to competing?

Nah mate, as far as I'm concerned as a United fan they're fecking morons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.