Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Like the one the Saudis passed? They only refused to sanction it initially due to the piracy dispute, once that was resolved it moved very quickly.

True. There wasn't any real issue about who was funding it though, where there is with the Qatari bid.

They'll probably find a way around it anyway as these types of owners don't follow the rules but the League would have to be incredibly incompetent not to see the Qatari State is behind it.
 
People assuming it's already done seem to be forgetting a few things. They'll be subject to a fit and proper test, proof of funds which given the possibility that it is really funded by the Qatari State doesn't make it a foregone conclusion at all.

And with the League currently involved in an investigation into what amounts to corruption with another ME State owning a club, plus the fact the initial refused to sanction the Saudi takeover of Newcastle, they're likely to be extra cautious with this one.

The scrutiny of any bid will be significant. The Qatari bid will likely be under even more than others, rightly or wrongly.

For a strange reason I am imagining a very old man opening a huge piggy bank and counting every penny up until its 5billion.
 
I don't want the Qataris for reasons already said which won't go over again now as it's just repeating old ground......

However one thing that I'd worry about under them is bringing in players like Neymar for example. I'm loving the atmosphere at our club right now and the players are all playing like they like and respect each other. Last thing we need is adding another big time Charlie like a Neymar. Pogba n Ronaldo sucked the life out of this team and I don't want to see that repeated.
 
It’s too hot a political potato. Real pressure here. Probably best to steer clear for the moment
Do you really think a poll would have any sort of impact on the CAF? In fact, I am bemused to see the mods being so unwilling to allow to run a simple poll. My perception of Redcafe has changed in the last couple of days.
 
As mentioned in earlier posts.

Qatar exclusively want 100% ownership including any shares on the NYSE.

The offer is £5bln/$6bln what the glazers want to sell.

SJR has offered £4bln for 69% (only glazers shares).
 
Is it possible those involved in the Qatar bid have already agreed the price for the remaining 31% hence the wording of their statement?
 
As mentioned in earlier posts.

Qatar exclusively want 100% ownership including any shares on the NYSE.

The offer is £5bln/$6bln what the glazers want to sell.

SJR has offered £4bln for 69% (only glazers shares).
Well if it's equal like that, the Glazers will probably sell to Sir Jim for the better PR
 
As mentioned in earlier posts.

Qatar exclusively want 100% ownership including any shares on the NYSE.

The offer is £5bln/$6bln what the glazers want to sell.

SJR has offered £4bln for 69% (only glazers shares).
£5 Billion would be the total package. Glazers + Other shares.
 
Is it possible those involved in the Qatar bid have already agreed the price for the remaining 31% hence the wording of their statement?
They may have agreed a price to offer to the 31% but these are publically traded shares so there's no guarantee they'd get them
 
Surely the only reason for buying up the A shares would be to remove it from the stock exchange and remove the red tape and transparency that comes with that?
 
You surely can't be comparing environmental issues to human rights abuses? One is much worse than the other, and trying to justify the lesser of the two being bad, just to give acceptance to the worse issue, is fundamentally flawed.
Agreed, destroying the Earth is unforgiveable.
 
£5 Billion would be the total package. Glazers + Other shares.

I don't think that it's correct. Raine only takes offers for the Glazers share and if I'm not mistake your conclusion is based on the "100%" mentioned which should be 100% of 69% since the statement says, 100% offer to buy out current owners the Glazer family.
 
Surely the only reason for buying up the A shares would be to remove it from the stock exchange and remove the red tape and transparency that comes with that?
Also the belief that the club will increase in value in the future. Finally, if they plan to invest their own money in the future, it makes sense to buy all the shares. Otherwise, they are putting money in the club to increase its value, while other shareholders are just free riders (although technically speaking, the new owners can dilute the shares by issuing new shares that they give to themselves).
 
This Sky Sports piece sums it up really on how I feel, and how majority of the fans I've interacted with feel.

 
I don't think that it's correct. Raine only takes offers for the Glazers share and if I'm not mistake your conclusion is based on the "100%" mentioned which should be 100% of 69% since the statement says, 100% offer to buy out current owners the Glazer family.

I'm suggesting by the wording of the Bloomberg article they are valuing the club at £5 billion because they have bid around £4-4.5 billion for the Glazers shares. Hence why I said the total package would be £5 billion or around that figure.
 
Are those 31% nyse listed? If yes, the heavy price increase there would make sense
They may have agreed a price to offer to the 31% but these are publically traded shares so there's no guarantee they'd get them

I’ve no idea how it works but thought others might.

The fact they specified 100% though, and INEOS have said 69%, seems to suggest there’s a difference and I doubt such carefully worded statements would get the details wrong.

I’m just assuming that the Qatar bid may have already had the greenlight for the other 31% if that’s even possible.
 
As mentioned in earlier posts.

Qatar exclusively want 100% ownership including any shares on the NYSE.

The offer is £5bln/$6bln what the glazers want to sell.

SJR has offered £4bln for 69% (only glazers shares).
This part isnt clear. If the bid is for entire 100% then its lower than SJR bid. If its for only Glazer share, then it is 1bn more than SJR bid. If latter is true, Ineos bid wont be accepted no matter what.
 
I don't think that it's correct. Raine only takes offers for the Glazers share and if I'm not mistake your conclusion is based on the "100%" mentioned which should be 100% of 69% since the statement says, 100% offer to buy out current owners the Glazer family.
Yes no way Raine can conduct sale for shares which are publicly traded if they are hired by Glazers. Both bid are for controlling shares which Glazers have. Makes you wonder how Ineos will compete considering their offer is 1bn less.
 
I'm suggesting by the wording of the Bloomberg article they are valuing the club at £5 billion because they have bid around £4-4.5 billion for the Glazers shares. Hence why I said the total package would be £5 billion or around that figure.

I see, didn't Bloomberg also suggest that all valuations were the lowest points and only meant to get access to more financial information which should be followed with an other bidding round?
 
Yes no way Raine can conduct sale for shares which are publicly traded if they are hired by Glazers. Both bid are for controlling shares which Glazers have. Makes you wonder how Ineos will compete considering their offer is 1bn less.
Essentially yeah, seems implausible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.