The Mail has been bought by the Qataris. It's like Pravda.
The Mail has been bought by the Qataris. It's like Pravda.
But wont you go public if you are bidding for the most famous sports team in the world?They don't have to go public though so there could well be more.
Not the biggest expert on this, but minority shareholders being forces to sell is done everywhere. And to be fair, since November, the share price has increased exactly for this reason, people buying shares so they sell them for more when the takeover happens.That apply to UK Based companies. We're a Cayman island based one.
Interesting.
I don't think so I think it's indicative of Glazers 69% + the other remaining shares due to the way they phrased the bid "Values the club at 5 billion"Wait, so 5b would be the value of 69 percent of the club?
Saying that Qatar have teamed up with Bank of America for financial advice.What was this tweet?
They don't have to go public though so there could well be more.
Not the biggest expert on this, but minority shareholders being forces to sell is done everywhere. And to be fair, since November, the share price has increased exactly for this reason, people buying shares so they sell them for more when the takeover happens.
Of course, the board proposal need to be voted by all shareholders but Glazers control the majority of shares (and voting rights).
Are the other parties interested on this happening is unclear, but Qatari has said that the bid is for 100% of shares.
Ah, gotchaI don't think so I think it's indicative of Glazers 69% + the other remaining shares due to the way they phrased the bid "Values the club at 5 billion"
ahh, that makes sense nowNot the biggest expert on this, but minority shareholders being forces to sell is done everywhere. And to be fair, since November, the share price has increased exactly for this reason, people buying shares so they sell them for more when the takeover happens.
Of course, the board proposal need to be voted by all shareholders but Glazers control the majority of shares (and voting rights).
Are the other parties interested on this happening is unclear, but Qatari has said that the bid is for 100% of shares.
Not the biggest expert on this, but minority shareholders being forces to sell is done everywhere. And to be fair, since November, the share price has increased exactly for this reason, people buying shares so they sell them for more when the takeover happens.
Of course, the board proposal need to be voted by all shareholders but Glazers control the majority of shares (and voting rights).
Are the other parties interested on this happening is unclear, but Qatari has said that the bid is for 100% of shares.
I think maybe the American companies don't want the potential negative PR. Just my opinion though, could quite easily be the case that no other bids have gone in.Very true Berba. But if we look at the chels sale for precedent, everybody went public. It was one big orgy.
Compare this with our current process, and its been eerily quiet with only two serious bidders.
Of course this could change come Monday, but I highly doubt it.
Safe assumption that its likely to be Qatar, considering there has been very little news of any bids from NA or other parts of the world.
It must have been agreed well beforehand.
Haven't you been a big defender of Qatar owning PSG, the big imbalance there and their spending? United face Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia, huge spending from Roman/Boehly yet you're concerned about United being Qatar backed even after the dominance of Abu Dhabi?
How do you feel about the money paid to Mbappe?
If Rashford is offered effectively 1 million per week by various means to play for PSG, what is your response to that? Awesome for the French league?
Far as I could ascertain the soft deadline was so soft as to be imperceptible.Did they have to have registered an offer on/before Friday to be in with a chance? It would help if I knew what "soft deadline" meant.
Logical points. I agree.I'm just going off from what's out there...
Avaram's frequent visits in Qatar. Main news around Qatar wanting us before soft deadline. A proper thoughtout statement when bid went in. SJR seeming to juat want publicity, following his rubbish statement. Elliot Management putting their hat in the ring but only dor offering their services, again, free advertising. And now no Saudi bid confirmed by the leading reporter on this Qatar bid.
All things point towards Qatar.
Like the one the Saudis passed? They only refused to sanction it initially due to the piracy dispute, once that was resolved it moved very quickly.People assuming it's already done seem to be forgetting a few things. They'll be subject to a fit and proper test, proof of funds which given the possibility that it is really funded by the Qatari State doesn't make it a foregone conclusion at all.
And with the League currently involved in an investigation into what amounts to corruption with another ME State owning a club, plus the fact the initial refused to sanction the Saudi takeover of Newcastle, they're likely to be extra cautious with this one.
The scrutiny of any bid will be significant. The Qatari bid will likely be under even more than others, rightly or wrongly.
The Daily Muppet? Well that's a name I can get behind immediately.
Not really no.Being seen them on twitter a lot recently. Assume its another aftv style channel
How rich are these compared to the Newcastle owners then?
Which Caf member runs the channel? If it's @Crackers then I'm unsubscribing.Not really no.
The American guy in the video, James Rhodes.Which Caf member runs the channel? If it's @Crackers then I'm unsubscribing.
It's the difference between "feck you all when the world ends because I've got a time machine" money and "feck you all when the world ends because I've got two time machines and a full price subscription to The Athletic" money.How rich are these compared to the Newcastle owners then?
Biggest risk is Raine pullet a rabbit out of the hat for the rats and combining a couple of American bids to allow them to stay.I still can’t see how the Qatar bid doesn’t win. It feels done to me.
“Those involved with the Qatar bid remain quietly confident of success ahead of what could be another two or three rounds of bidding.”
These oil/gas rich countries like Saudi, UAE and Qatar sit on hundreds of billions in cash ($) and trillions in assets, it doesnt make much of a difference which one owns which club, no one else can compete with their wealth.How rich are these compared to the Newcastle owners then?
People assuming it's already done seem to be forgetting a few things. They'll be subject to a fit and proper test, proof of funds which given the possibility that it is really funded by the Qatari State doesn't make it a foregone conclusion at all.
And with the League currently involved in an investigation into what amounts to corruption with another ME State owning a club, plus the fact the initial refused to sanction the Saudi takeover of Newcastle, they're likely to be extra cautious with this one.
The scrutiny of any bid will be significant. The Qatari bid will likely be under even more than others, rightly or wrongly.
Do you think Saudi have stayed out of it because they know Qatar have one hand on the trophy so to speak?
At this point I'm fairly certain that if they engineered a way to stay in control, the fan backlash would make the last 20 years seem like a nice holiday.Biggest risk is Raine pullet a rabbit out of the hat for the rats and combining a couple of American bids to allow them to stay.
If it's a full takeover, it would have to be Qatar. No one has the money to come close but I think the Glazers would accept a lower valuation if they can stay in control.