DevTheRed
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 1,104
If after all this the glazers stay there will be a full on riot.. can’t wait
Careful, you'll get banned for saying thatAny group other than the Qatar bid winning would be a disaster
Exactly. I'm studying contract law right now and by not including anything in his offer advertised to the public other than nationalistic conjecture, he's being careful to not be held to any commitments. Big Red flag for me.Big red flags that INEOS and Jim have briefed the press about stadium developments etc. Rather than including it as part of their statement. Gives them an easy way to avoid committing to it.
Yeah that part is being mentioned here. They could have included in the statement. But apparently if you point that out you are ME ****
Not saying they will avoid it after but not sure why they didnt include in the statement
The 4bn in Tax he saved by moving to Monaco, the lowballing on buying businesses and bullying employees. To me, everything he does is chancing. He even attempted to bully our company.
When the news broke back in august that the glazers were looking at selling minority stake Ineos released a statement saying they were open to any discussions around working toward majority ownership and funding the huge infrastructure spend required. Yes, they’ve dropped the PR ball so far. But there is zero doubt this is a good bid and feck all like the glazers.Big red flags that INEOS and Jim have briefed the press about stadium developments etc. Rather than including it as part of their statement. Gives them an easy way to avoid committing to it.
Its not race. It's private individual or consortium versus nation state (any nation state, but one with horrendous human rights record needing image polish-up to boot) in disguise.Strictly from a sporting project, the Qatari proposal is clearly superior and provides more of what the club needs than Ratcliffe. Of course the latter is a “local bid”. Probably been repeated hundreds of times already, no billionaire comes in with clean hands, from the Middle East or Europe. All or most are corrupt and could give two shits about being the authority on ethics and morals.
IMO Ratcliffe checks one important box for so many opposed to the Qatari bid: British. Let’s not pretend race doesn’t matter. If you evaluate each bid without knowing who made it, I’m certain many would presume that it was Ratcliffe who was creating the 92 fund with a commitment of investing billions around Old Trafford, investing in youth and redeveloping the area around the stadium. I mean of course it’s the local billionaire who would commit to such projects in Manchester not someone from Qatar.
Apparently makes me hate gay people, tooCareful, you'll get banned for saying that
No but the news just came out, surprised by some of the reactions already.
There isn't going to be a change in ownership that isn't going to isolate at least some section of the fans. People will find reasons to be pissed off.
Common side-effect.Apparently makes me hate gay people, too
Given the nature of the rivalries and pettiness between these royal families, and the fact we are the biggest prize realistically available, I would be very surprised if there is no Saudi bid now the qataris have gone public.
It will probably be a month before we really know what each proposal really means.
Exactly. I'm studying contract law right now and by not including anything in his offer advertised to the public other than nationalistic conjecture, he's being careful to not be held to any commitments. Big Red flag for me.
Yeah, I don't think there'll be much protest against the bid because they won't want to undermine their ask of wanting the Glazers out ASAP. So it'll be difficult to protest a Qatar bid because of that.
What I suspect might happen is a display of banners supportive of the Ratcliffe bid.
For the life of me I cannot understand how anyone who calls themselves a United fan can support American hedgefunds or Ratcliffe's bid. This would be the final nail in the coffin for us. We cannot take anymore debt and we certainly need a shitton of investment to catch up.
Careful, your casual racism is showing.Yeah surprising the fanbase terrorised by exorbitant interest rates and American owners would react negatively to an American hedge fund willing to bankroll an owner by saddling him with exorbitant interest rates.
It really is a mystery.
Sounds fecking smart to me.
Go out and get chancing though I say.
He’s not suggesting they’re breaking contract lawwhat? How could the Qatari bid break contract law if they say develop the hospitality sections of Old Trafford only?
There’s nothing concrete there either.
Surely nothing there can be held against them in court, the contract is between them and the Glazers, unlike the Chelsea sale.
Who is going to walk away because SJR buys us?There isn't going to be a change in ownership that isn't going to isolate at least some section of the fans. People will find reasons to be pissed off.
Not in any way to diminish a state's responsibility toward human rights, but we are an American-owned British club.
Our governments have been invading and bombing people in other countries, in the not too distant past.
What's Qatar's body count?
Exactly. I'm studying contract law right now and by not including anything in his offer advertised to the public other than nationalistic conjecture, he's being careful to not be held to any commitments. Big Red flag for me.
Mind-boggling to see the amount of people who are perfectly happy to see the club become a sportswashing vehicle for human rights abusing cnuts.
Sounds fecking smart to me.
Go out and get chancing though I say.
Who is going to walk away because SJR buys us?
Ratcliffe isn't talking big enough for me
Usually those who then wait infront of the Megastore to buy an Mbappe 7 shirt first thingSome lads on here would have us plunged further into debt rather than take on ME owners, just so they can feel morally superior. They can feck off to be honest. I hope you don't show your faces here again when Qatar's bid is accepted.
We won’t end up with American ownership. The fans will go crazy. Qatar, whether we like it or not, will win the bid because they seem the most prepared and obviously have the wealth to throw whatever they want at it.Rather have INEOS or Qatar than that US fund. Just please no
Of course it isn’t binding. Yet another made up reason to discredit the SJR bid. This place has gone proper bonkersIf he had included those promises in his initial statement would it have been binding though? My understanding would be that it's still possible to renege on that promise if they wanted to. Definitely concerning either way that it wasn't originally mentioned.
'Debt on the club' or 'debt on INEOS' is the same thing - someone is gonna have to pay that. And before someone comes up to me with the 'INEOS has 60 billion revenue', that's not profit. They can have 1 trillion in revenue, it doesn't matter if their expenses are just as much.No buyer is putting debt on the club. Where are you getting this idea from?
This club has suffered enough on the hand of Americans. No thanks.If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.