Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Reasonably confident that he doesn’t know his arsehole from his earhole, never mind the details of what’s going here.

Rich Sheikh: Hey Emir, I hear you're bidding on MUFC. Can I bid too?
Emir: Sure, if you win there's no hard feelings.
Rich Sheikh: Cool I'll put in a secret bid
Emir: May the best man win. I love to wash our dirty laundry in public.
 
I wonder if persistent protestors like @Wumminator would prefer Elliot ahead of the Qataris.

Of course he'll probably say he wants neither but that'd just be a cop out. Obviously everyone will have a rank of preferences from good to bad. Let's hear it.

We don't even know the details of the Eliott bid yet do we?
 
Because so many are sooooo desperate for ME money, they are desperately trying to find anything wrong with the INEOS bid.
Doesn’t matter how many time it’s explained, they want to throw shit at INEOS.
Yeah, and according to some the INEOS pitch is racist and xenophobic too.
 
ahhhh. Whataboutism at it’s finest.

Ahhh even finer, complete ignorance to my original point.

Close your eyes, don’t think about where the bid is coming from, and tell me which one is better for the club? The one where details have been laid out on what the new owner intends to do or the one from a local lad who just months ago bid for Chelsea? It’s a very easy answer.
 
Strictly from a sporting project, the Qatari proposal is clearly superior and provides more of what the club needs than Ratcliffe. Of course the latter is a “local bid”. Probably been repeated hundreds of times already, no billionaire comes in with clean hands, from the Middle East or Europe. All or most are corrupt and could give two shits about being the authority on ethics and morals.

IMO Ratcliffe checks one important box for so many opposed to the Qatari bid: British. Let’s not pretend race doesn’t matter. If you evaluate each bid without knowing who made it, I’m certain many would presume that it was Ratcliffe who was creating the 92 fund with a commitment of investing billions around Old Trafford, investing in youth and redeveloping the area around the stadium. I mean of course it’s the local billionaire who would commit to such projects in Manchester not someone from Qatar.

The reality of it is that there is a cultural component to it, which will be priced into the broader bid process from a fan perspective. Also, the idea that the Qataris are promising infrastructure development won't be the overriding factor in the Glazer's calculus on who they sell to. They are simply going to go with whoever they can squeeze more money out of following a bidding war.
 
I can see Ratcliffe and Elliott joining forces. Their debt ridden bid will be capable of beating Qatar.
 
Ahhh even finer, complete ignorance to my original point.

Close your eyes, don’t think about where the bid is coming from, and tell me which one is better for the club? The one where details have been laid out on what the new owner intends to do or the one from a local lad who just months ago bid for Chelsea? It’s a very easy answer.
Did you read either proposal? Or are you going by what you see on Twitter ? And from Mike Keegan of DailyMail?
 
I can see Ratcliffe and Elliott joining forces. Their debt ridden bid will be capable of beating Qatar.

If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.
 
Only if Qatar allow that to happen. Don't think anyone can beat Qatar, purely financially, if they're hellbent on buying United
Mate, Qatar ain't in control of anything. They aren't going to win either as their bid is nowhere near what Raine is looking for.
 
If we were debt free under the Glazers, they’d likely have taken huge dividends.

The debt borrowed to leverage the buyout was on awful terms, that swallowed up so much. Currently United pay 18m /year, that’s nothing for INEOS or the Qatari bid to take on.

My original point was Glazers should've not been allowed to buy the club

My other point is the buyout was on awful terms and that took up so money. Why repeat that back to me?

I've not suggested or implied Qatar Ineos bid in terms of taking on the 20m per year currently is a problem so I don't know what your point is there. Should go without saying, especially with Qatar as well as a new stadium.

My only question is the financing of a new stadium and complex along with the current debt for Ineos while keeping up with summer spending along side debt free oil clubs. With Qatar that is so obviously sorted.

We're talking 1.5-2bn to redo OT, training and womens stadium? How much are we hampered paying that off under Ineos? Do half of those improvements even happen? Do we get just a mild stadium update?

Further questions is Sir Jim is old. How much interest is there from his family and business to remain behind United once he's gone, do we get sold off in 5-10 years time anyway as they would rather back other companies, sports or clubs and don't fancy keeping United.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps a bit more reseach instead of deciding based on a few sentences in a tweet?

This kind is the definition of the word vultures. They will finance someone's bid for a minority stake, very likely under brutal conditions for the loanee. The Chinese guy they financed for AC Milan couldn't keep up with the repayment plan, so they removed him and sold to Redbird a few years later. Meanwhile, AC Milan were barely trodding along and were banned from European competition because they couldn't break even.

This would be the absolute worst outcome by a significant margin.
I've done my research after reading Telsim's post. Have you?

15% interest in their loan to Zhang to purchase Milan. Does that fancy you?
 
If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.

I hope you're right. However I honestly crapped in my pants when the Elliotts had been named. I prefer the Glazers to them
 
If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.

But Ballmer doesn't need anyone to finance it and definitely not at the type of rates that Elliott work with. I would assume that Elliott will be linked with a much smaller bidder.
 
Precisely, we know absolutely nothing about their plans.
We do know that the debt isn't going to be cleared. We also don't see any positive plans towards the redevelopment of the club like the Qataris do. We also do know that the money that INEOS is going to buy the club with is going to be 'helped" via American bank loans. I think that's enough for me to know we're getting another Glazers.
 
If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.

Is there credible links to him?
 
Point being they have more wealth to throw around than the other bidders
True but they aren't interested in overpaying either. There was noise that their bid would "blow others out of the water" but it was still very conservative.
 
True but they aren't interested in overpaying either. There was noise that their bid would "blow others out of the water" but it was still very conservative.
That's what I meant if they allow that to happen. If they're willing to overspend, they can do so more than the others. Why would they though?
 
Only if Qatar allow that to happen. Don't think anyone can beat Qatar, purely financially, if they're hellbent on buying United

If the price goes beyond the ridiculous then they might as well bail out of it
 
Mate, Qatar ain't in control of anything. They aren't going to win either as their bid is nowhere near what Raine is looking for.

Nobody is outbidding Qatar on this. They’ve gone public on the bid and will not been seen to be outbid by a rival. If it’s 5B or 6 they’ll pay it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.