AlPistacho
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2022
- Messages
- 1,782
So if a vegan stomped out your burger and called you all sorts you wouldn’t point out that he was wearing a fur coat?ahhhh. Whataboutism at it’s finest.
So if a vegan stomped out your burger and called you all sorts you wouldn’t point out that he was wearing a fur coat?ahhhh. Whataboutism at it’s finest.
Reasonably confident that he doesn’t know his arsehole from his earhole, never mind the details of what’s going here.
Mental gymnastics.Smoke and mirrors to show they aren’t linked to the state?
So if a vegan stomped out your burger and called you all sorts you wouldn’t point out that he was wearing a fur coat?
Yea old Jimmy’s hands are clean for sure. Don’t think he and Ineos have any ties with the British government at all.
Perhaps a bit more reseach instead of deciding based on a few sentences in a tweet?The previous owners of AC Milan...no thanks
I wonder if persistent protestors like @Wumminator would prefer Elliot ahead of the Qataris.
Of course he'll probably say he wants neither but that'd just be a cop out. Obviously everyone will have a rank of preferences from good to bad. Let's hear it.
Yeah, and according to some the INEOS pitch is racist and xenophobic too.Because so many are sooooo desperate for ME money, they are desperately trying to find anything wrong with the INEOS bid.
Doesn’t matter how many time it’s explained, they want to throw shit at INEOS.
ahhhh. Whataboutism at it’s finest.
Elliott lends 600 million to RedBird for the purchase of Milan. Interest rate at 15%
Strictly from a sporting project, the Qatari proposal is clearly superior and provides more of what the club needs than Ratcliffe. Of course the latter is a “local bid”. Probably been repeated hundreds of times already, no billionaire comes in with clean hands, from the Middle East or Europe. All or most are corrupt and could give two shits about being the authority on ethics and morals.
IMO Ratcliffe checks one important box for so many opposed to the Qatari bid: British. Let’s not pretend race doesn’t matter. If you evaluate each bid without knowing who made it, I’m certain many would presume that it was Ratcliffe who was creating the 92 fund with a commitment of investing billions around Old Trafford, investing in youth and redeveloping the area around the stadium. I mean of course it’s the local billionaire who would commit to such projects in Manchester not someone from Qatar.
Close your eyes, don’t think about where the bid is coming from, and tell me which one is better for the club?
Elliot's business with AC Milan:
Did you read either proposal? Or are you going by what you see on Twitter ? And from Mike Keegan of DailyMail?Ahhh even finer, complete ignorance to my original point.
Close your eyes, don’t think about where the bid is coming from, and tell me which one is better for the club? The one where details have been laid out on what the new owner intends to do or the one from a local lad who just months ago bid for Chelsea? It’s a very easy answer.
What do we know about the INEOS bid so far?
What do we know about the INEOS bid so far?
Only if Qatar allow that to happen. Don't think anyone can beat Qatar, purely financially, if they're hellbent on buying UnitedI can see Ratcliffe and Elliott joining forces. Their debt ridden bid will be capable of beating Qatar.
What do we know about the INEOS bid so far?
They are moving Manchester to Manchester.
Its putting Manchester back in Manchester United!
They are moving Manchester to Manchester.
I can see Ratcliffe and Elliott joining forces. Their debt ridden bid will be capable of beating Qatar.
Mate, Qatar ain't in control of anything. They aren't going to win either as their bid is nowhere near what Raine is looking for.Only if Qatar allow that to happen. Don't think anyone can beat Qatar, purely financially, if they're hellbent on buying United
Precisely, we know absolutely nothing about their plans.
If we were debt free under the Glazers, they’d likely have taken huge dividends.
The debt borrowed to leverage the buyout was on awful terms, that swallowed up so much. Currently United pay 18m /year, that’s nothing for INEOS or the Qatari bid to take on.
Perhaps a bit more reseach instead of deciding based on a few sentences in a tweet?
I've done my research after reading Telsim's post. Have you?This kind is the definition of the word vultures. They will finance someone's bid for a minority stake, very likely under brutal conditions for the loanee. The Chinese guy they financed for AC Milan couldn't keep up with the repayment plan, so they removed him and sold to Redbird a few years later. Meanwhile, AC Milan were barely trodding along and were banned from European competition because they couldn't break even.
This would be the absolute worst outcome by a significant margin.
Point being they have more wealth to throw around than the other biddersMate, Qatar ain't in control of anything. They aren't going to win either as their bid is nowhere near what Raine is looking for.
If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.
That it's being fronted by a chancer and attention seeker. Who is happy to brief soundbites but no further information.
They are the highest bidder.
If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.
We do know that the debt isn't going to be cleared. We also don't see any positive plans towards the redevelopment of the club like the Qataris do. We also do know that the money that INEOS is going to buy the club with is going to be 'helped" via American bank loans. I think that's enough for me to know we're getting another Glazers.Precisely, we know absolutely nothing about their plans.
If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.
True but they aren't interested in overpaying either. There was noise that their bid would "blow others out of the water" but it was still very conservative.Point being they have more wealth to throw around than the other bidders
Ballmer is the best choice. It's a pity that his passion lies in basketball, not football.If its an American owner, Steve Ballmer would seem like a logical choice. He's worth more than all bidders combined and is already experienced in the world of Sport.
No.Is there credible links to him?
That's what I meant if they allow that to happen. If they're willing to overspend, they can do so more than the others. Why would they though?True but they aren't interested in overpaying either. There was noise that their bid would "blow others out of the water" but it was still very conservative.
Only if Qatar allow that to happen. Don't think anyone can beat Qatar, purely financially, if they're hellbent on buying United
But Ballmer doesn't need anyone to finance it and definitely at the type of rates that Elliott work with. I would assume that Elliott will be linked with a much smaller bidder.
Mate, Qatar ain't in control of anything. They aren't going to win either as their bid is nowhere near what Raine is looking for.