Definitely substance to it now between this and Luke Edwards being the first to report it last night
Largely agree. Pretty much anyone coming in and looking to sign new players are relying on knowledge that they gained at their previous club (and that might be of limited use if that club is focusing on different types of players) and knowledge that our current staff are providing.Considering recruitment planning takes atleast 6 months (can refer to many sources here, latest being the Klopp announcement interview), and none of the SJR’s appointments are likely to take charge before the end of the season, not sure how much of an impact you are expecting? Not to say that the new management cannot take better decisions, but they are constrained by the amount of the groundwork done by the outgoing team.
The Glazers are the only other ones who hold B shares. So Ratcliffe buying 25% means they will still have 75% between them.With the percentage, I thought JR had 25% b shares and 25% a shares? I thought the leeches now only owned 44% b shares between all 6 and JR was the biggest single shareholder?
There's too much noise around it to not happen and at no point has Newcastle or Ashworth come out to say it’s not happening, weren't Newcastle interested in Bournemouth’s DOF ? Can’t remember his name but read it in a few places recently.
Massive and big day so happy.
Would we have to go through this process each time Jim buys up shares?
I'm not 100% certain, but I think the other Glazers can sell separately but the shares would switch to Class A (ie. almost pointless in terms of gaining control) unless the rest of the Glazers agree that they can be bought as Class B. That's what happened with all previous sales prior to Ratcliffe buying this 25%. If that is the case, I'm also not certain whether all six of the Glazers would have to agree or whether it can be a majority rule (so if the other four agree to it then Avram and Joel wouldn't be able to stop it).Is there anything to stop Jim buying the shares of the other two Glazers down the line or can they only be sold collectively alongside the Avram and Joel's
I don’t think so.Is there anything to stop Jim buying the shares of the other two Glazers down the line or can they only be sold collectively alongside the Avram and Joel's
Great news. Only thing.. it’s a bit typical United. Getting reported in the news before we’ve even approached. I really liked the way we got Berrada that was completely out of the blue and not a sniff from the press until it was done. Maybe I’m traumatised from our years of being so badly run and the way this is being reported is the norm or maybe it was strategically leaked (Madrid) style ‘unsettle’ AnsworthDefinitely substance to it now between this and Luke Edwards being the first to report it last night
Great news. Only thing.. it’s a bit typical United. Getting reported in the news before we’ve even approached. I really liked the way we got Berrada that was completely out of the blue and not a sniff from the press until it was done. Maybe I’m traumatised from our years of being so badly run and the way this is being reported is the norm or maybe it was strategically leaked (Madrid) style ‘unsettle’ Answorth
Yeah, it really is incompetence of the highest order that it has taken this long to happen. The Glazers really did not care about how the club was operated once it was making them money.I cant believe we are finally getting a DoF...
Which is very shortsighted of them, given that they could've made a lot more money had the club been run properly.Yeah, it really is incompetence of the highest order that it has taken this long to happen. The Glazers really did not care about how the club was operated once it was making them money.
That's what she said.That was quick
That's what she said.
The Glazers are the only other ones who hold B shares. So Ratcliffe buying 25% means they will still have 75% between them.
After the £300 million investment it’ll be 29% of Class B shares that Ratcliffe owns and I read somewhere it’ll likely be 33%, @Woziak can you confirm on that please as I think you also touched on that ?
If Ratcliffe does have 33% it’ll mean that the parasites will only have 36% of the club between them as 31% is owned by various people/companies on the stock exchange, Ratcliffe has said he’s not in this for any money so we know at least 29-33% of profits will go back into the club which is massive from how it’s been over the last decade.
See below link for later tweet in same Twitter thread. The entire thread is very informative (written by a United fan who’s a transactional lawyer).
https://x.com/ole_was_right/status/1740043653765087479?s=61&t=ZvGzfV2Qafn11jKrPfufuA
”Remember how I said that the document broke the parties into blocks for ease of drafting, and the handling of contingencies? Well, that's where this gets fun. Pursuant to Section 7.1, the Glazers can *only* drag SJR into a sale, if they are the majority holder (50%+1 share). And, even then, there is an 18 month grace period during which they won't be able to activate the "drag along" clause. On day 1, SJR will have 25% voting power. Within the first year, SJR will own 29% of the club. Concurrent with that, he will have 18 months to convince the Glazers not named Avram and Joel (collectively referred to from hereon out as, the "super bastards") to sell him 21% of shares, which he can easily obtain by just buying out two of the non-super bastard Glazers.“
The transaction inherently pre-supposes, via these clauses, that this deal only ends 2 ways: with SJR in control; or with a full sale at an enormous up-charge to the would-be purchaser.”
Yes, and even then, you will have to navigate the legal minefields that Newcastle are likely to include as part of their agreement (e.g., no poaching of a known target etc.)Largely agree. Pretty much anyone coming in and looking to sign new players are relying on knowledge that they gained at their previous club (and that might be of limited use if that club is focusing on different types of players) and knowledge that our current staff are providing.
I certainly hope we see some improvement, but it's the kind of thing that will probably improve further each window for a couple of years before we start seeing the full benefit.
In saying that, if the new guys (likely Ashworth and perhaps a future Head of Recruitment or other positions) were looking at similar types of players at their previous clubs, then we might see a more immediate impact.
I think they never expected to be owners for that long actually. The massive influx of money in football led to the dramatic valuation of football clubs all around the world and they got fecked because the number of people who could afford to buy them out shrank.Which is very shortsighted of them, given that they could've made a lot more money had the club been run properly.
Who else is getting a Ratcliffe #7 jersey for the 24-25 season?