Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Indeed. If anything they have become worse under their ownership.

A Nice fan did an ama on Reddit about it a few months ago and basically his ownership of Nice makes the Glazers look like heroes. The comments were full of cope, saying “it would be different with United.”
 
Makes me sick to think Richard Arnold has been popping the champagne corks tonight, celebrating keeping his job with this news.

He's going nowhere.
The Athletic has reported that Ineos have demanded sporting control as part of their bid. There's also been reports that Paul Mitchell is being considered for the DoF role. I really doubt Arnold and Murtough are safe.
 
*Raising my glass in honour*

United is bigger than being owned by an inhuman state which didnt guarantee no great succes neither (PSG says hi)

If you think INEOS is a white knight your wrong Radcliffe started like an an American hedge hund if career is littered with Glazer esque leveraged buyouts where the only objective was profit and if people got hurt in the process well thats business, i don't subscribe to that approach, business should always have an ethical goal of making the lives of people better.

InNEOS not only do the have an appalling record when to comes to looking after there workers and the communities in which they operate, they have an even worse record when it comes to protecting our environment.

New Report Takes Hard Look at Chemical Giant’s Trail of Pollution

WASHINGTON, DC/BRUSSELS—Facilities owned by the massive chemical corporation Ineos are responsible for scores of serious health and safety violations across the globe, a troubling record that should move United Kingdom leaders to slam the brakes on the company’s push to begin fracking in the United Kingdom. Ineos has never drilled a commercial gas or oil well, and its indifferent safety record in chemical plants justifies blocking its foray into fracking.

A new issue brief from Food & Water Watch and Food & Water Europe examines Ineos plants in the UK, and across Europe and the United States. The company’s 71 facilities in 18 countries are responsible for a vast array of accidents, chemical leaks, fires and explosions, and substantial air and climate pollution.

“From towering chemical fires in Germany to toxic air pollution in Scotland and plastic pellets littering our oceans, Ineos’s safety record is appalling,” said Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch.
 
We'll be fine, we've been run by accountants for years. It'll be like before 2005 again, almost can't believe it. Now we just need to find another Fergie :drool:

Go look at Nice for a reflection of how it will go :drool: can’t wait.

Villa better be ready for that Europa spot battle!

You think the Glazers are bad? you better strap yourself in. Sir wrinkly bollocks brain shattering plan to get Nice challenging last summer was Ross Barkley and Aaron Ramsey :drool:

Rest of the PL are shitting themselves
 
A Nice fan did an ama on Reddit about it a few months ago and basically his ownership of Nice makes the Glazers look like heroes. The comments were full of cope, saying “it would be different with United.”

Not surprised. Hey, they sign past it players too (Ross Barkley, Ramsey, Kasper Schmeichel) so it shouldn't be too different to the current side.
 
The Athletic has reported that Ineos have demanded sporting control as part of their bid. There's also been reports that Paul Mitchell is being considered for the DoF role. I really doubt Arnold and Murtough are safe.

A new DoF may come in, but they'll still work under Arnold. May actually be a relief to him as the heat gets taken off him. Just like Woodward was, Arnold is the Glazers main man and they won't let him leave.
 
I am speculating yes, because we don't have information either or.

If glazers are just paid a sum straight up then of course they will not put that back in the club.

But since this is a deal where they need to offer similar to the public shareholders to not be sued, then it's possible it may be structured in a way that says i.e. "The public valuation of the club is $3.2B right now based on the NYSE. We will buy 25% of the club for $8-900M, but to get Glazers to agree to sell right now an additional $600M is part of the price, but handled as a cash injection in the club, solving the liquidity issues, while increasing the value of the Glazers remaining shares (and also the ones that Ineos buys)".

You could say that why would the NYSE people agree to sell their shares if the value might go up? They don't have to, but they legally have to be offered to. If not enough is willing to sell for Ineos to get 12.5% from the stock market then I'm certain that there are provisions that the Glazers will sell additional shares up to the total 25%.


There are lots of ifs and buts and many factors we are not privy to. All I'm saying is that there is no way someone is buying 25% of the club at this point without making additional moves to protect that investment and increase chances that it pays off in the longer run (either through increased value of existing shares or a road to full control).

You have a very hopeful outlook, with hopeful reasoning.

I'd love for you to be right, but the INEOS investment doesn't need protecting. If the club increases in value, that's ROI. If it stays level the dividends will pour in as they do for the Glazers. If he valuation drops, then they can look to take over.

None of those sceneries offer much encouragement for the club. Either we continue to limp along while our competitors get further out of reach, or we collapse enough to lower the valuation to something INEOS can afford, and so the road back is even longer.
 
Hilarious that some people think it can’t get worse than the Glazers. Ohhh it can and we’re about to see it.
 
Have you not been following this thread? Tons of United fans tossing themselves off over the Glazers staying and teaming up with Del Boy. Thought most of us hated these feckers but apparently not.
Maybe they've all subscribed to a private pay per view channel that allows them to watch or join in on the glazers/ sir jim mutual masturbation session. We fans get screwed as they continue to milk the club. Maybe it's time to make better use of my time and money and just drop football.
 
You have kinda changed my mind, however, assuming Ineos can come up with the funds in the next 3 or so years wouldn't the current bid structure be preferable over taking out a loan that would have interest?

Only if the loan repayments were somehow more than the extra money the Glazers would be due in the meantime; dividends, salaries, etc.
 
No chance they’re taking on all the clubs debt and putting up the money for the stadium and transfers with just a 25% stake. They could potentially do in …….6 fecking years? load of shite
Okay well go be happy with the Glazers then? Not sure what you want
 
First of all we don't know that, and second that cnut of Radcliffe is a failure as well. Just see Nice in France, see their fan forums they all hate him.

We're feck theres no two ways about it. I blame that decking cnut of Radcliffe the glazers were against the wall and he threw them a lifeline to keep them in charge. A fan my bollocks he's as despicable as the glazers even worse feck the glazers and feck that stupid cnut Radcliffe.
Please go out and get some fresh air
 
Hopefully Ratcliffe gets 100% of the club quickly and he backs up his words from prior press interviews on how he'd run the club and little sign of the Glaziers selling up they will be here for many years taking their dividends while Old Trafford continues to deteriorate.

I will fully support him and hope he does amazing. Just hope the Glazers somehow don't cling on.

Radcliffe is not buying 100% INEOS are buying 25% of the Glaziers shares, there is no indication that either he or the Glaziers are going to pay off the debt or invest in the CLUB

If you think INEOS is a white knight your wrong Radcliffe started like an an American hedge hund if career is littered with Glazer-esque leveraged buyouts where the only objective was profit and if people got hurt in the process well thats business, i don't subscribe to that approach, business should always have an ethical goal of making the lives of people better.

InNEOS not only do the have an appalling record when to comes to looking after there workers and the communities in which they operate, they have an even worse record when it comes to protecting our environment.

New Report Takes Hard Look at Chemical Giant’s Trail of Pollution

WASHINGTON, DC/BRUSSELS—Facilities owned by the massive chemical corporation Ineos are responsible for scores of serious health and safety violations across the globe, a troubling record that should move United Kingdom leaders to slam the brakes on the company’s push to begin fracking in the United Kingdom. Ineos has never drilled a commercial gas or oil well, and its indifferent safety record in chemical plants justifies blocking its foray into fracking.

A new issue brief from Food & Water Watch and Food & Water Europe examines Ineos plants in the UK, and across Europe and the United States. The company’s 71 facilities in 18 countries are responsible for a vast array of accidents, chemical leaks, fires and explosions, and substantial air and climate pollution.

“From towering chemical fires in Germany to toxic air pollution in Scotland and plastic pellets littering our oceans, Ineos’s safety record is appalling,” said Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch.
 
Maybe they've all subscribed to a private pay per view channel that allows them to watch or join in on the glazers/ sir jim mutual masturbation session. We fans get screwed as they continue to milk the club. Maybe it's time to make better use of my time and money and just drop football.

Wow so not being state owned by a horrific regime is what leads you to give up on football. Amazing
 
I am speculating yes, because we don't have information either or.

If glazers are just paid a sum straight up then of course they will not put that back in the club.

But since this is a deal where they need to offer similar to the public shareholders to not be sued, then it's possible it may be structured in a way that says i.e. "The public valuation of the club is $3.2B right now based on the NYSE. We will buy 25% of the club for $8-900M, but to get Glazers to agree to sell right now an additional $600M is part of the price, but handled as a cash injection in the club, solving the liquidity issues, while increasing the value of the Glazers remaining shares (and also the ones that Ineos buys)".

You could say that why would the NYSE people agree to sell their shares if the value might go up? They don't have to, but they legally have to be offered to. If not enough is willing to sell for Ineos to get 12.5% from the stock market then I'm certain that there are provisions that the Glazers will sell additional shares up to the total 25%.


There are lots of ifs and buts and many factors we are not privy to. All I'm saying is that there is no way someone is buying 25% of the club at this point without making additional moves to protect that investment and increase chances that it pays off in the longer run (either through increased value of existing shares or a road to full control).

Sheihk Jassim offered the Glaziers double the Clubs current market value, debts cleared investment in the stadium and in the local community, Why would you think they would take less and invest their own money in the club.
 
Guarantee our rivals fans are pissing themselves with this news.
RAWK

Qatar offer anything like $4 Billion for us and Henry sells. =P
How do you withdraw your interest after it's already been rejected
The Qataris have pulled out of the running to buy this shower of shit, I'm sure Che Neville will be pleased
So they embarrassed themselves for nothing?
Christ it's full armour and hard hats needed when reading the takeover thread on the Caf.

Toys, babies, plates, glasses and any utd paraphernalia being thrown in every direction. Doors slammed, laptops and phones smashed in total meltdown.

Beautiful
Imagine twerking for a human rights abusing disgrace state for a year and then they pull out. Embarrassment, all of them. Especially Che Neville
I bet pretty much all the tv pundits are going to be is a sour mood with another sportswasher not buying Man Utd.


Some of you (not necessarily you) are a bit out of touch when it comes to our rivals..
 
SJR is a disgrace, apparent United fan who was up against a better proposal to progress the club and the facilities. Instead of pulling out, he’s made it all about himself and has let the club and fans down. I’d be fine if he was buying a controlling stake now but this doesn’t look good for real investments in the facilities or paying off debt in the future. He’s going to have to do a lot to appease fans which will be difficult with his hands tied, some shiny new signings won’t make it all better.

Saying that, I understand the 92 not wanting to overpay but they were always going to overpay, they highlighted it was double of what the club was worth so were never going to save face.
Even a Ineos type deal of buying 75% now with the Glazers holding the other 25% with a agreement to buy them out in the coming years at a premium should’ve been considered.

Not sure what has happened on the Glazers side for the other 4 siblings to just happily go along with this and not take the money now. £27M for each Glazer now opposed to the £575m they could have. Do they honestly not think they could make more money elsewhere in other investments over the next 3-6 years.
 
Sheihk Jassim offered the Glaziers double the Clubs current market value, debts cleared investment in the stadium and in the local community, Why would you think they would take less and invest their own money in the club.


Because they believe the club will be worth even more in a few years than what Jassim was offering. Based on the heavy investments by the Saudis this summer, and potential of football becoming a bigger thing in the US.

So they accept a smaller sum now to fix the current liquidity needs for short term, while betting on being able to get a bigger payout later.
Neither Jassim nor Jim agree with the Glazers future evaluation, so they wouldn't pay that premium now. But Jim was willing to start with a minority investment with the goal to own everything in the future. He realized he wouldn't win the bid now if he didn't either go for a minority stake first, or paying a higher valuation than he and Qatar believes in.
 
Only if the loan repayments were somehow more than the extra money the Glazers would be due in the meantime; dividends, salaries, etc.
This is where I'm way out of my depth, I have no idea what the interest would be like on a loan that big. The Glazers take out roughly 22 mil in dividends each year and lets imagine a similar amount in salary and other expenses. So the equivalent of a 44mil payment each year. If you assume a loan of 6 billion, if my math is correct that's only a 0.0073% interest rate. If you argue it'd only be a 3 billion loan then that's still only 0.0146% interest rate. That seems crazy low to me. Again, I don't really know what I'm talking about.
 
Wow so not being state owned by a horrific regime is what leads you to give up on football. Amazing
It was a horrible choice but what other choice was there? We're in such deep debt the current regime CAN NEVER repay. The stadium and facilities are crumbling. The inept, yes men, toadies running the club will remain in place as long as they're enabling these turds. Enjoy giving the scum your hard earned money and being in the bottom half of the table for the next 10 years, unless it collapses earlier.
 
A full sale? debt cleared, stadium financed? basically everything Sir Jim’s bid isn’t offering
Well no bid is offering that? So again I ask what do you want? Qatar have pulled out because the Glazers turned it down, they didn’t wanna offer the same valuation as Ratcliffe, so perhaps they should have done so, but they didn’t. At this point you’re crying about an impossible scenario instead of being happy that something is atleast happening, aka a full takeover in a few years. We’ve gone this long with the rats honestly whats waiting a few more knowing they’ll eventually be gone?
 
It was a horrible choice but what other choice was there? We're in such deep debt the current regime CAN NEVER repay. The stadium and facilities are crumbling. The inept, yes men, toadies running the club will remain in place as long as they're enabling these turds. Enjoy giving the scum your hard earned money and being in the bottom half of the table for the next 10 years, unless it collapses earlier.
Ratcliffe is buying 25% and taking over in a few years by all reports, and the Glazers will be gone, did you just ignore this or what?
 
Ok let’s play devils advocate here;

Jimmy the Rat is worth $20 billion however most of that wealth is tied up in asset value shares for INEOS where he owns over 60%. He is not liquid rich, he doesn’t have £20 billion in his back pocket!

He’s done a deal which he’s clearly very talented at, it’s the second time he’s outmanoeuvred Qatar and your see I mentioned that way back. He can’t do anything until he buys the 26% he needs to be the major decision maker, his pr machine is quickly stating he’ll own 51% in 3 years moving towards full 100% ownership in 6-7 years.

What can he effectively do in the next 3 years?

1. He can’t Clear the debt because he’s not obliged to as he’s not the majority shareholder therefore the debt continues and the club is strangled by ever rising interest rates, The Glazers will control the way the club is run on a day to day basis for the next three years so 2024-2027. They will be severely hampered by new FSP and FFP rules, it only takes 2 out of those 3 years that we don’t qualify for CL and the value of the club diminishes out of sight?

2. His £1.5 billion for 25% of the club is purely a transaction of cash for shares but he’ll maybe use clever lawyers to make sure that he has the option to buy the remaining percentage of club but there is still no guarantee, the Glazers could agree to sell their remaining controlling shares to the highest bidder in 3 years if they really want with the new owners just paying a move a side fee to Ratcliffe.

3. So we will now be looking at cheap
Loan deals for more average players In January 2024, club will have no real cash to do anything this winter or summer, watch the true fire sale now in the next two transfer windows, United are having a genuine January Sale starting with
Jadon Sancho URP(United Retail Price) £73m now slashed by 70% to Jan Sale £22m we will have the red point of sale all over the club to sell off 8-9 players.


4. INEOS can arrange a loan for refurbishing the stadium since the Glazers can’t get credit, they can charge a small handling fee on that as the club once again lines the pockets of yet another parasite.

5. What he can do is maybe influence who should be employed within the football structure, he might employ Paul Mitchell but that creates even more issues who is Mitchell’s boss, Ratcliffe or Joel Glazer ?

6. He’s probably not even put a clause in the contract to say that when he transfers money to the Glazers for their shares that £90m must be paid in the next three years to alleviate FFP constraints.


For all those fans thinking this a wonderful deal for the club, think again, we do need to hear what INEOS have to say about how they see their investment developing and what influence they will have if any in the day to day running of the club.

Is there a chance that Ratcliffe cocks this up during the second and third year and then either Jassim returns or Saudi consortium comes in? For example, the valuation does not go up and no infrastructure gets improved.
 
Well no bid is offering that? So again I ask what do you want? Qatar have pulled out because the Glazers turned it down, they didn’t wanna offer the same valuation as Ratcliffe, so perhaps they should have done so, but they didn’t. At this point you’re crying about an impossible scenario instead of being happy that something is atleast happening, aka a full takeover in a few years. We’ve gone this long with the rats honestly whats waiting a few more knowing they’ll eventually be gone?

What makes you think Jim will be better? he’s making up the numbers in France, his club was relegated in Switzerland. He’s hiring people at his football clubs that have no history in football, making awful signings it’s honestly the exact same blue print as the people you want gone.

Give me your positives about Ratcliffe and I’ll shoot the lot down.
 
Last edited:
Ratcliffe is buying 25% and taking over in a few years by all reports, and the Glazers will be gone, did you just ignore this or what?
I'm not that naive and I'm not that patient. The glazers aren't going ANYWHERE when they think the value of the team will close to double in the next ten years. jimmy gave the owners a lifeline and in exchange, received the opportunity to join them sucking us dry.
 
What’s with the widespread doom mongering in here? Do you all know something I don’t?

Where do I start?
  • The Glazers are still in charge
  • Sir Jim Ratcliffe is only a minority owner
  • Sir Jim's other football clubs suck horse schlongs
  • There is no promise of getting rid of the debt
  • There is no promise about revamping Old Trafford
  • There is no promise about the expansion/building into a better training ground
  • And our players won't be able to live through the same adrenaline rush that Newcastle players and manager went through as soon as the support from the PIF began to be felt.
For all the talk people have said about this or that about Qatar sponsoring terrorism, please remember that we are now dealing with an actual pollution terrorist who threatened to close a plant and send workers on welfare because he was not happy with complying with EU pollution rules.

Our football club is totally fecked.
 
Last edited:
We are finished. We will never be rid of the parasites, Brexit Jim is cut from the same cloth - the fact that he has done a complete U-turn and got into bed with the Glazers says everything about him as a person. Her probably won’t even be around by the time (if ever) the full takeover happens.
 
If only we had a good alternative. From all the noise Radciff's track record is shit. Can see our inevitable slip to consistent mid table stature continuing. These chaps will probably go for Liverpool
 
So the Glazers turned down reportedly £5.8 billion from SJ for their 69% controlling shares with the debt of £535m to be deducted from that figure. That’s effectively £5.26 billion however Sir Jimmy offered $1.875 for 25% which is £6.184 billion for 100%, the debt would still have to be paid the moment INEOS own 51% of the club planned, currently in 3 years time in 2027. So a fair comparison is £5.6bn against £5.26bn so what the real issue here is the Glazers wanted to hang on to the asset, hoping the new broadcasting deals elevate the value of the club even further to £8-10 billion.

I’m sure the other 4 Glazers who wanted to sell might be thinking tonight, they wish that maybe the Qataris would come back with the £5.8 billion offer, because if the six siblings invested £5.26 billion for three years with a fixed 5% investment interest rate this would give you over £6 billion in total after the debt was paid, no wonder SJ withdrew his offer, there’s greed, then there’s extreme avarice and then there is the Goblin Glazer Greed, no words are necessary for these parasites!
 
Where do I start?
  • The Glazers are still in charge
  • Sir Jim Ratcliffe is only a minority owner
  • Sir Jim's other football clubs suck horse schlongs
  • There is no promise of getting rid of the debt
  • There is no promise about revamping Old Trafford
  • There is no promise about the expansion/building into a better training ground
  • And our players won't be able to live through the same adrenaline rush that Newcastle players and manager went through as soon as the support from the PIF began to be felt.
For all the talk people have said about this or that about Qatar sponsoring terrorism, please remember that we are now dealing with an actual ecoterrorist who threatened to close a plant and send workers on welfare because he was not happy with complying with EU pollution rules.

Our football club is totally fecked.
Jesus Christ. We don't need any finacial support we're not a tiny garbage club like Newcastle. If you want everything gifted to us and unearned please just go and support City or PSG. They sound like the right club for you. All we need is an owner who won't rob the money we actually make ourselves.
 
This could lead us to get relegated or at best have another season we had in 2021/22. Wish the Glazers would just d--, they are just a bunch of smug criminals under a veil of sporting owners.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.