Right... So you leak a report so that you can anger the other half that isn't already angry?
Exactly. Surely if they were going to leak bullshit to take the heat off it would be around massive incoming transfers and not the sale.
Right... So you leak a report so that you can anger the other half that isn't already angry?
Said people last week when he said the club made a U-turn on Greenwood…Custis writes for the sun
that is all I’ve to say on the matter
Mid October will come and go and still we will be none the wiser about the takeover.
If I had the skills I'd make a meme of the mythological tale of the guy who rolls the big rock down a hill only for it to show up at the top again shortly afterwards. The rock would have Joel and Avram's faces on it and the guy rolling it would be Ten Hag.
He's writing for the Sun, he can publish anything he wants with no recourse.I'd say Custis is making a huge gamble if he's guessing.
Said people last week when he said the club made a U-turn on Greenwood…
We've been hearing that good news for the best part of several months now, so its hardly a surprise its met with cynicism this time around. Especially when the sole source seems to be The S*n.Terrible journo reports bad news: RedCafe goes into meltdown/must be true/the world is ending.
Terrible journo reports good news: No truth whatsoever/BS merchant/it’s just a brief to quieten down the fans.
RedCafe Logic 101.
I think he’s playing a guessing game. I do think there is a sale happening but can you put a timeline on something like this? I think he’s putting it down to there being a international break and hoping it gets announced then.I'd say Custis is making a huge gamble if he's guessing.
It's one thing getting transfer stories wrong, but something as huge as this, you really are putting your credibility on the line. I don't think he's a bad journalist, I don't think he's the best wither but if he has got this wrong, I'll not be reading anything he produces again and I'm sure I'm not the only one who'll think that way.
All I’m saying is that he had a source that called Greenwood’s situation correct the entire way though and that could be argued only came from the top.
Im not saying Custis is one hundred percent correct here but it holds more weight for me when it’s right on the heels of his Mason exclusives.
Nobody is going to prison now! Nobody went to prison when Bloomberg or the Financial Times had their little exclusives
Surely that goes against the norm? They usually have to protect their source.Need more substance to believe it. There's a good chance this is a deflection away from the Greenwood situation, Richard Arnold under pressure to step down, sit down protest this weekend, and the impending disappointment of the transfer window closing in just over a weeks time.
Want to believe it, but it all seems a little too convenient, and a story not revealing the source is suspicious.
Exactly this. After the similar article he wrote earlier in August, no one else has managed to find the same information and back him up.You’re missing the point entirely.
- The likelihood of someone within the club having that knowledge is slim.
- If one person had that knowledge and leaked it to Custis, it would be easily traced back to them.
- If multiple people in the club had that knowledge, there’s no way it would have only leaked to Custis. Sure he might be the only journalist but I can guarantee you that the share price would be close to or above $30 with some people in the know seeing an easy way to make money.
You’re missing the point entirely.
- The likelihood of someone within the club having that knowledge is slim.
- If one person had that knowledge and leaked it to Custis, it would be easily traced back to them.
- If multiple people in the club had that knowledge, there’s no way it would have only leaked to Custis. Sure he might be the only journalist but I can guarantee you that the share price would be close to or above $30 with some people in the know seeing an easy way to make money.
You’re assuming The Sun has obtained these exclusives by legal and ethical meansYou’re missing the point entirely.
- The likelihood of someone within the club having that knowledge is slim.
- If one person had that knowledge and leaked it to Custis, it would be easily traced back to them.
- If multiple people in the club had that knowledge, there’s no way it would have only leaked to Custis. Sure he might be the only journalist but I can guarantee you that the share price would be close to or above $30 with some people in the know seeing an easy way to make money.
Being leaked to provide the Glazers/hierarchy cover through to the end of the transfer window without making any significant investment.
When it doesn’t happen rumours will circulate about significant investment in the January window.
Part way through January stories will be leaked that takeover will happen in Feb/March.
Rinse and repeat.
they've invested loads though?
You’re missing the point entirely.
- The likelihood of someone within the club having that knowledge is slim.
- If one person had that knowledge and leaked it to Custis, it would be easily traced back to them.
- If multiple people in the club had that knowledge, there’s no way it would have only leaked to Custis. Sure he might be the only journalist but I can guarantee you that the share price would be close to or above $30 with some people in the know seeing an easy way to make money.
Wasn’t exactly rocket science to be second guessing that if he did .Said people last week when he said the club made a U-turn on Greenwood…
They’ve invested literally nothing only taken out. They’ve allowed the clubs money to be spent on transfers in lieu of investing in the stadium and training ground etc but it’s evident that’s now running/run dry.
You’re missing the point entirely.
- The likelihood of someone within the club having that knowledge is slim.
- If one person had that knowledge and leaked it to Custis, it would be easily traced back to them.
- If multiple people in the club had that knowledge, there’s no way it would have only leaked to Custis. Sure he might be the only journalist but I can guarantee you that the share price would be close to or above $30 with some people in the know seeing an easy way to make money.
Wasn’t exactly rocket science to be second guessing that if he did .
If someone within the club knew what Custis is claiming, then the circle of people that know would be a lot wider than Neil fecking Custis and the share price would be around $30 right now.
Today... He's profiting from selling Todibo to usWhen was the last time there was an article with anything remotely positive about Ratcliffe
Plus they broke the Maguire and Scott double bid from West Ham and their long distance medicals that was also laughed at.My guess would be that it could have been the staff lower down at the club themselves leaking MG stories, there were certainly multiple leaks to different rags the past weeks including how the staff felt about the situation. The club sale is a completely different situation and will be far more difficult to gain sources, but this is a Murdoch owned rag let us not forget.
Nothing positive about that manWhen was the last time there was an article with anything remotely positive about Ratcliffe
I'm still standing by my November prediction. Called it a long ass time ago.
Knowing Custis and the Sun, it’s more likely Arnold’s Secretary?I think it would have to be Arnold if it was anyone, but I doubt he'd do that. There is only a tiny benefit compared to the potential issues.
It's the sort of stupid shit Woodward would pull.
Knowing Custis and the Sun, it’s more likely Arnold’s Secretary?
I'm still standing by my November prediction. Called it a long ass time ago.