His posts were nothing like Cantona. Cantona was pure class.
Well yeah, this thread is a dumpster fire but at least he was entertaining. Even thought 90% of the tweets he posted were utter nonsense a part of you hoped it was true.
His posts were nothing like Cantona. Cantona was pure class.
thanks mate
Agree. Twitter is a cesspit of blue tick wankers with usernames like @MUFCRonaldoMess177786 and they always claim to have ‘inside sources’
Muppetiers are the worst though. How anyone over the age of 14 takes them seriously I will never know. And I didn’t even know about them until joining RedCafe. So I blame you lot!
I’m surprised he lasted this long. I just finished from a 3 day forum ban for posting a Qatar flight tracking tweet in here. Go figure.Thread banned apparently.
They banned you for that?I’m surprised he lasted this long. I just finished from a 3 day forum ban for posting a Qatar flight tracking tweet in here. Go figure.
The scout in me hopes you learnt a lesson but my inner muppet is well proud of you. I'm conflictedI’m surprised he lasted this long. I just finished from a 3 day forum ban for posting a Qatar flight tracking tweet in here. Go figure.
The scout in me hopes you learnt a lesson but my inner muppet is well proud of you. I'm conflicted
Who do we all want then?
a) Jassim / Qatar
or
b) Sir Jim / Ineos ft. the Glazers?
Came in hoping for this…
And instead got this… on repeat
If it happens to be (a) who will you support instead? Or will you just stop watching football or become a “neutral” fan?Option b, cuz I don't wanna stop supporting this club.
Who do we all want then?
a) Jassim / Qatar
or
b) Sir Jim / Ineos ft. the Glazers?
Anyone half reliable ?
Ok well his argument seems disingenuous then and it is just a formality. More daft arguments to contend with.
Any ideas on what this clause pertains to? If the Glazers owned 1% and somebody else owned 99%, they'd still have the voting rights?
I made the mistake of watching a United Stand video once. I don’t watch Sky Sports News anymore and don’t buy papers and I thought I’d get a quick update on the days transfer rumours. My god. It’s what feels like an hour of talking in circles around a made up headline.
Aye! Deemed an inappropriate tweet. I was surprised as there’s about 1000 other reasons to be ban me than that.They banned you for that?
I’d hoped the 3 day break would have done me good but I feel like I’ve come back as an even bigger bellend.The scout in me hopes you learnt a lesson but my inner muppet is well proud of you. I'm conflicted
I agree, but I feel I have to point out that you are the ringleader of this scout rebellion, I've just been led astray.The scout in me hopes you learnt a lesson but my inner muppet is well proud of you. I'm conflicted
Prefer A but would be fine with BWho do we all want then?
a) Jassim / Qatar
or
b) Sir Jim / Ineos ft. the Glazers?
The clause exists but it's already been established it wouldnt apply as the specific wording for SJRs bid is "controlling stake". It applies more to the idea an individual Glazer wanted to raise some extra capital rather than just selling their entire share holdings.
It's another of those things some people desperately cling onto.
I love how Utd Stand have these delicious looking thumbnails that suck you in only to spend the next 30 minutes talking in depth about the shite I just read on Twitter!I made the mistake of watching a United Stand video once. I don’t watch Sky Sports News anymore and don’t buy papers and I thought I’d get a quick update on the days transfer rumours. My god. It’s what feels like an hour of talking in circles around a made up headline.
Everyone wants the team to win do they not?
I can't be held responsible if you become an unhinged transfer muppetI agree, but I feel I have to point out that you are the ringleader of this scout rebellion, I've just been led astray.
Indeed. Some on the buying side betting Qatar. Some selling at a profit of around 9 USD per share if they bought in at the float. Would be interesting to see what the big funds and stakeholders are doing.To be fair Spoons those purchases don't materialize out of thin air. For every share acquired, someone was willing to sell at that price. Swings and roundabouts etc.
Do you still think it’s going to be him?
I love how Utd Stand have these delicious looking thumbnails that suck you in only to spend the next 30 minutes talking in depth about the shite I just read on Twitter!
I find United View much more entertaining. Flex and KG are a hilarious duo.
Out of curiosity, what the scooby is a scout? I thought all of you guys with a funky badge were mods.The scout in me hopes you learnt a lesson but my inner muppet is well proud of you. I'm conflicted
Their job is to go round pressing 'like' on the dumbest posts they can find.Out of curiosity, what the scooby is a scout? I thought all of you guys with a funky badge were mods.
If it happens to be (a) who will you support instead? Or will you just stop watching football or become a “neutral” fan?
Phew close call. Was just about to press 'post reply'Let’s get the topic back on track please
Watching football as a neutral seems kinda pointlessEither stop or become a neutral.
And a moral bankrupt apparently.I can't be held responsible if you become an unhinged transfer muppet
Watching football as a neutral seems kinda pointless
Do we? I thought the common consensus was it was most likely Radcliff?Everyone knows its very likely Qatar and always has been. When is the question.
Do we? I thought the common consensus was it was most likely Radcliff?
Do we? I thought the common consensus was it was most likely Radcliff?
His bid is not a leveraged buy-outCan Ratcliffe buy Utd now with the new rules the Premiership have agreed to with leveraged buyouts?