red thru&thru
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2004
- Messages
- 7,657
I have come around to this.Not sure. I'd rather not have an oil state, tbh. But maybe it's the only option.
I have come around to this.Not sure. I'd rather not have an oil state, tbh. But maybe it's the only option.
They wanted the World Cup and got it. Their owner rose to the very top of UEFA (maybe FIFA)Why are they selling though?
Jude Bellingham.There's something fishy going on with Beckham and Neville and Qatar. The last 18 months, Neville has been very anti-Glazer and very pro-Qatar. If you are of the opinion things dont just happen randomly, then that's very interesting.
Beckham could be a public DOF, but he'd never do that role day to day. The perfect role would be to have him as a public face, with the donkey work and finances being done by others. Who wouldnt sign if you had a pep talk from a super famous, super rich mega star footballer like Beckham taking you out to his house in Miami to discuss to direction of the club and how you'd benefit from signing?
Not sure, but they aren't the first. City sold a fraction as well.Why are they selling though?
Why are they selling though?
I did joke during the World Cup that they’d no longer give a toss about PSG after it was done, but I guess it is actually possible now? I mean, what can pumping more money into PSG do that such a successful WC hasn’t done already?At the moment, they are not selling the club but trying to sell minority shares. Why? Because PSG was never a toy but an investment meant to put Qatar and Doha on the map.
At the moment, they are not selling the club but trying to sell minority shares. Why? Because PSG was never a toy but an investment meant to put Qatar and Doha on the map.
At the moment, they are not selling the club but trying to sell minority shares. Why? Because PSG was never a toy but an investment meant to put Qatar and Doha on the map.
Do you think that they'll buy United now?
There won't be a place for him with the class of 92 filling up the slots.can we keep Murtough instead?
HahahaThere won't be a place for him with the class of 92 filling up the slots.
I did joke during the World Cup that they’d no longer give a toss about PSG after it was done, but I guess it is actually possible now? I mean, what can pumping more money into PSG do that such a successful WC hasn’t done already?
given the failure of the club to actually win the CL and the weakness of Lique 1 now vs the PL, it doesn’t seem that unrealistic for them to sell up and (shudder) buy a club like us or Pool instead.
Do you think that they'll buy United now?
If American investors were involved the seemingly agreed sponsorship with the Saudis wouldnt have come to a halt, the color of money is all the same. What is more likely is that the Saudis don't like who is buying us, whoever is buying us doesn't like the Saudis or the Saudis on hearing the news of a sale being one of the options don't want to strengthen the Glazers' hand by giving them a massive sponsorship deal that makes them think twice about selling.All of this could be interpreted any way you like.
Could be the Saudis are buying the club, so no point in a sponsorship. Or they've heard Qatar are buying the club and want nothing to do with it. Could be Dubai, and neither of those want anything to do with it. Or could be neither, and a partial sale by Americans is a lot more likely. I mean, if PSG can find takers for that overseas, surely Manchester United could to the same? Could be one of Glazer's buddies. Or could be none of those things and we get bought out by an Indian billionaire.
I for one am hoping for some more tangible information. Sooner rather than later, preferably.
Was a part of the deal. France did well from it. Just for a vote eh.
Do we think there’s something in the Qatar (possibly with Becks as the ambassador) links?
Saudi shirt sponsor talks ended, might explain why Qataris are getting others in at PSG too
And for them, they’re going to get much more out of owning United than fecking PSG
Does anyone know the next time the Glazers have to speak / release something?
maybe quarterly results, fan forums, shareholder updates etc?
@Messier1994
If American investors were involved the seemingly agreed sponsorship with the Saudis wouldnt have come to a halt, the color of money is all the same. What is more likely is that the Saudis don't like who is buying us, whoever is buying us doesn't like the Saudis or the Saudis on hearing the news of a sale being one of the options don't want to strengthen the Glazers' hand by giving them a massive sponsorship deal that makes them think twice about selling.
I wouldn't look much into what the Quataris are doing with PSG either because I wouldnt put past any M.E dictatorship to pour money into an investment fund with specific instructions to buy PSG and run it for the via proxy. I wouldn't put it beyond the Saudis to do the same with us either, park us into some fund and then slowly reveal themselves over the years.
I believe so. Plus, wasn't there an article out recently in the Times talking about how the Emirati of Qatar is a United fan?
By far the most likeliest reason for them pulling out. The fact it’s leaked they were interested and have withdrawn on the same day Ronaldo is finalised isn’t just a coincidence for me. They don’t need to sponsor a football club for tourism purposes now they have Ronaldo and his social media power.Or we got rid of Ronaldo and they decided to buy him instead and use him to plaster their brand all over social media for about the same or less investment. Or they didn't like the terms set by the Glazers. Or the uncertainty around the club. Them pulling out doesn't prove or disprove anything. It's entirely open to interpretation.
By far the most likeliest reason for them pulling out. The fact it’s leaked they were interested and have withdrawn on the same day Ronaldo is finalised isn’t just a coincidence for me. They don’t need to sponsor a football club for tourism purposes now they have Ronaldo and his social media power.
That article would be questionable since he is supposed to not be a fan of Football. He is about Motorsports and Tennis.
The article was via the telegraph and was written by Sam Wallace, who said that one of the sons of the Emir was a big United fan and not the Emir himself.I believe so. Plus, wasn't there an article out recently in the Times talking about how the Emirati of Qatar is a United fan?
I don't see how it's related to Ronaldo at all. Ronaldo was about to leave in 6 months anyway and the new sponsorship deal will take effect from the next season most likely, just makes no sense for it to be related. IF they pulled out, it's most likely because we already have a buyer and it's not someone they like to be associated with. OR they are the ones buying the club and will do a PSG style sponsorship "deal" with some ridiculous amounts of money which means no point in having any negotiations at this moment.If it's due to Ronaldo moving on it rules out Saudi interest in buying our club.
Agreed. They wouldn't have pulled out due to a soon to be 38 year old Ronaldo who was likely going to be moved on at the end of the season.I don't see how it's related to Ronaldo at all. Ronaldo was about to leave in 6 months anyway and the new sponsorship deal will take effect from the next season most likely, just makes no sense for it to be related. IF they pulled out, it's most likely because we already have a buyer and it's not someone they like to be associated with. OR they are the ones buying the club and will do a PSG style sponsorship "deal" with some ridiculous amounts of money.
I don't see how it's related to Ronaldo at all. Ronaldo was about to leave in 6 months anyway and the new sponsorship deal will take effect from the next season most likely, just makes no sense for it to be related. IF they pulled out, it's most likely because we already have a buyer and it's not someone they like to be associated with. OR they are the ones buying the club and will do a PSG style sponsorship "deal" with some ridiculous amounts of money which means no point in having any negotiations at this moment.
Like the qataris?Probably have agreed to sell to a buyer they(Saudis) aren't compatible with.
David Beckham. Used to play for us in the 90's/early 00's.
Probably have agreed to sell to a buyer they(Saudis) aren't compatible with.
Ownership linked sponsorship aren’t allowed anymore. Before the takeover would actually be the time to do it if they were buying us - which I very much doubt.Hardly worth singing a deal if they’re taking over since they’ll get that anyway
Aah, wicked. Thanks for correcting me.The article was via the telegraph and was written by Sam Wallace, who said that one of the sons of the Emir was a big United fan and not the Emir himself.
Qataris buy the club, plonk stadium 974 as our temporary home beside OT, rebuild the existing ground. Sorted.
I don't see how it's related to Ronaldo at all. Ronaldo was about to leave in 6 months anyway and the new sponsorship deal will take effect from the next season most likely, just makes no sense for it to be related. IF they pulled out, it's most likely because we already have a buyer and it's not someone they like to be associated with. OR they are the ones buying the club and will do a PSG style sponsorship "deal" with some ridiculous amounts of money which means no point in having any negotiations at this moment.
This would be my guess too. Either they’re buying us and incorporate the travel board as a sponsor once they’re in the door, or they know whose buying us and don’t want to be associated with supporting said group