Waynne
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2014
- Messages
- 2,140
There's no better description of that place.Twitter is the puss filled boil on the asshole of the internet.
There's no better description of that place.Twitter is the puss filled boil on the asshole of the internet.
Starting to feel like Glazers were using the Qataris to bait SJR into making a better offer all along
So like many have said and Phil Brown tweeted why is Jassim continually bidding less than Ratcliffe. Then again if the leeches want to stay and he has offered that why haven't they accepted
If INEOS takes on the debt it's not a problem for them. Probably a huge tax benefit.
Structure at the club is improving. If they don't mess with it too much we should be fine. Can't get much worse than the last 10 years.
Presume when INEOS take over then we are going to hear about taking on the debt is a huge tax relief. They will put out some PR fluff about that's why they aren't clearing it
In short, people (a large volume) are speculating on the stock ending above $24 by next Friday which obviously implies Qatar gets the club or is at least preferred bidder. For those 70c contracts, people are paying 70c per stock to get the option to buy it at the strike price (e.g. $24) by the expiry date (next Friday).
The Level 2 bit refers to being able to see the demand and supply for options and stocks which can indicate interest and potentially someone knowing something.
Large demand usually means someone knows something but it could very well be a punt as well.
Royal addressbook wasn't updated :/But Arnie works out of OT and Joel & Avi couldn’t point to Manchester on a map! No boss in Mayfair, just woowars empty office.
So like many have said and Phil Brown tweeted why is Jassim continually bidding less than Ratcliffe. Then again if the leeches want to stay and he has offered that why haven't they accepted
Well INEOS offered the Glazers what they want apparently, which is investment with 2 of them keeping their shares in the club so I think it makes sense the reason they haven't accepted it is they were just dragging it on to get more money from Sheikh JassimCan any of the posters in here who are still bullish that Qatar are going to win care to give some reasoning for that confidence.
I do think there could be some merit in the thinking that the British media are going with INEOS winning due to no leaks from Qatar.
Might just be because we're so used to the way the Glazers do things but I don't believe INEOS will just take on the debt without taking money out of the club to pay it offWhy would you care. INEOS is Sir Jim and he is INEOS. If he puts the debt on INEOS what does that matter to you?
It won't affect United in any way
Well INEOS offered the Glazers what they want apparently, which is investment with 2 of them keeping their shares in the club so I think it makes sense the reason they haven't accepted it is they were just dragging it on to get more money from Sheikh Jassim
Well INEOS offered the Glazers what they want apparently, which is investment with 2 of them keeping their shares in the club so I think it makes sense the reason they haven't accepted it is they were just dragging it on to get more money from Sheikh Jassim
Well INEOS offered the Glazers what they want apparently, which is investment with 2 of them keeping their shares in the club so I think it makes sense the reason they haven't accepted it is they were just dragging it on to get more money from Sheikh Jassim
I'm sure there's a lot of detail to be discussed and negotiated by lawyers etc. It could easily be the case that they're going to accept SJRs bid after the third round of bidding, but it's currently going through due diligence. For me it's quite telling that they've apparently never spoke to Jassim after his bid and this talk about them being dubious about him and his funding.
I don't think all 6 Glazer siblings are going to agree on any of Ratcliffe's proposals due to the structures. There is a "lack of cohesion" among them, as the Financial Times put it. That works massively in Jassim's favour.Can any of the posters in here who are still bullish that Qatar are going to win care to give some reasoning for that confidence.
I do think there could be some merit in the thinking that the British media are going with INEOS winning due to no leaks from Qatar.
It looks like he's reached it now with this final offer, just depends now on the Glazers actually making a decisionWhat figure do you think he's willing to reach
I don't think all 6 Glazer siblings are going to agree on any of Ratcliffe's proposals due to the structures. There is a "lack of cohesion" among them, as the Financial Times put it. That works massively in Jassim's favour.
If reports are to be trusted, I think Jassim's valuation is now close enough to Ratcliffe's that the Glazers will be receptive to negotiating with him and the final valuation will end up at or above Ratcliffe's. If Jassim can just hit the right number and take it all now, that is the easiest solution and the one most likely to result in all 6 agreeing. Some will try to tell you that number is £6B or nothing. I don't believe that for a minute.
I can't fathom why the proposed structure of Ratcliffe's bid keeps changing, other than difficulty in getting all of the siblings on board. It went from the full Glazer stake (69%), to 4 now and Joel and Avram later, to now where FT are saying the focus is on a structure where all 6 sell down in phases. I don't think Ratcliffe's valuation of the club in his 69% bid would beat the Sheikh's valuation of the club in his latest bid, otherwise the reporting on these other structures makes little sense to me.
It looks like he's reached it now with this final offer, just depends now on the Glazers actually making a decision
It's hard to confirm how much either of them have actually bid because we keep seeing varying reports. But if its true Ratcliffe has bid more plus he's willing to let the Glazers keep a stake in the club then why are they still dragging it on, the deadline they set was ages agoTrouble is he still hasn't matched Ratcliffe's overall bid,therefore until that happens I don't see the needle moving in Jassim's favour.
Hopefully if the Glazers can actually decide what they want and negotiate, it seems like they're still too busy arguing between themselves because 4 of them want a full sale and 2 don'tSo you don't believe there's room to negotiate
If I had to guess, I would say in the range of £5.4-5.5B. Only each Glazer would know their own price, but £6B is pure fantasy. The reports don't even have Ratcliffe's phased structure at that valuation.What do you think is the magic number that they want Jassim to hit out of interest
It actually started as puddings, not specifically desserts, was kinda my fault, it just morphedDamn, I missed the dessert discussion…it’s blueberry pie ftw.
Hopefully if the Glazers can actually decide what they want and negotiate, it seems like they're still too busy arguing between themselves because 4 of them want a full sale and 2 don't
Big day is here and awaiting a Romano ‘here we go’ YouTube post
AgreedThe Ineos Grenadier looks rubbish.
Come back on August/September
You do understand that if INEOS ‘take on the debt’ it’s the same effect to the club as clearing it? It’s just a different method of dealing with it. The club will effectively be free of the debt.Presume when INEOS take over then we are going to hear about taking on the debt is a huge tax relief. They will put out some PR fluff about that's why they aren't clearing it
INEOS will take on the new debt (incurred to buy the controlling stake). They aren't clearing the existing debt, that will still be on the books of the club.You do understand that if INEOS ‘take on the debt’ it’s the same effect to the club as clearing it? It’s just a different method of dealing with it. The club will effectively be free of the debt.
Its like an old Scimica.Agreed
INEOS will take on the new debt (incurred to buy the controlling stake). They aren't clearing the existing debt, that will still be on the books of the club.
Agreed
INEOS will take on the new debt (incurred to buy the controlling stake). They aren't clearing the existing debt, that will still be on the books of the club.
Can you explain how that works with the change of control clause on the current debt then?Precisely, you beat me to it
It’s like a ropey kit car version of an old Defender, which is basically what it is.It like an old Scimica.
For now. Most likely dependant on how well the new Grenadier sells.INEOS will take on the new debt (incurred to buy the controlling stake). They aren't clearing the existing debt, that will still be on the books of the club.