It does in my work - here’s the plan for Q1 etcBreaking the year into quarters is not something that happens outside of financial speak either, is it?
It does in my work - here’s the plan for Q1 etcBreaking the year into quarters is not something that happens outside of financial speak either, is it?
Depends on the context I suspect. In pregnancy it's roughly 12 weeks, or a third. In academia it's one of the three terms, autumn spring or summer, so again a third.
It does in my work - here’s the plan for Q1 etc
Q1 of 2023 is January, February and March of 2023. It's not as complicated as you tedious know-alls are trying to make it sound.
spot on.
honestly im laughing the last few pages have been a discussion over the meaning of Q1. Only this place
Exactly it’s quite common and just refers to what period of the year is being talked aboutSame when I had a company. We always used Q1 for Jan, Feb, March even though the fiscal year was different.
Right, I was thinking of academia, where three terms in a year would make it a third of a year, not three months, but having thought again they might well have had three months off, so that would fit then..All of these are based on a year, that's the context. Trimester means a period of three months, not a third, a trimester is a fourth of a year and also a set of three consecutive months.
Guess you are someone who buys a brand new set of tires right before you sell your car just as a gesture of goodwill for a new owner.
Like you I'd love to interpret it in the positive way I hope it was meant. That was my initial take. I'm a great overthinker though. At times like this when you want something so much you start to think things can be too good to be true so start to look at the half empty approach. It's not easy being me!
Ornstein might be respected but he's a huge attention whore.
That statement is Romano levels of waffle.
Tough crowdHardly new information.
$50m is hardly a $100. Point is, nobody in their right mind would spend such amount of money on something they are looking to sell soon unless it increases the asset value which in this case it will not, certainly not by that amount.If I sold the car for 100 000 and it would cost me 100 to change the tires, sure, why not. Out of sentiment for my good, old 17-year-old car. But bad analogy anyway. There aren't millions of people who love my car.
It's either the first trimester or the second. I'm getting the hang of it now.So which is it lads? Is Q1 from January to March or April to June?
Alot of thought going into these quarters
It's either the first trimester or the second. I'm getting the hang of it now.
So which is it lads? Is Q1 from January to March or April to June?
Neither. It begins from the start of the season. Q1 is August, September and October.So which is it lads? Is Q1 from January to March or April to June?
It's obviously Jan to March, not because of one convention or another but because Stone mentioned early spring and June is not early spring.So which is it lads? Is Q1 from January to March or April to June?
Predicted for Q1 and it will be a big news (seismic) that we'll have new owners. What's new?Tough crowd
Neither. It begins from the start of the season. Q1 is August, September and October.
I may be over interpreting but I don’t think I’d see a transition to some investment consortium as a “seismic event” in the clubs history given our current ownership.
Maybe I’m giving him too much credit but that quote from Ornstein makes me think oil state ownership.
Some are desperate for it to be before end of January because they think that means £200m to spend. It's so transparent. Hahaha
Neither. It begins from the start of the season. Q1 is August, September and October.
Some are desperate for it to be before end of January because they think that means £200m to spend. It's so transparent. Hahaha
Q1 of 2023 is January, February and March of 2023. It's not as complicated as you tedious know-alls are trying to make it sound.
Some people are desperate to look smarter than they are. Guess which description you fit?Some are desperate for it to be before end of January because they think that means £200m to spend. It's so transparent. Hahaha
I’m no Sherlock Holmes’s but If we’re being bought in Q1 which is on the Gold Coast in Australia it surely points to Rupert Murdoch being back in for us, seriously guys have a word with yourselves.
I may be over interpreting but I don’t think I’d see a transition to some investment consortium as a “seismic event” in the clubs history given our current ownership.
Maybe I’m giving him too much credit but that quote from Ornstein makes me think oil state ownership.
If you listen/watch the actual segment (it's in the Felix thread in the transfer forum), he actually says 'seismic event in the clubs history' and specifically says it with reference to the fans wanting rid of the Glazers for the longest, so there's really nothing new there, unfortunately.Yes I agree with above posters it's hardly groundbreaking,however it's from a tier 1 source which is significant.
Weird he dropped that to nbc so casually instead of the Athletic first