I really don't understand the meaning or purpose of that.Maybe fans like myself should be wearing a star on their arm to distinguish themselves from superior fans like yourself.
I really don't understand the meaning or purpose of that.Maybe fans like myself should be wearing a star on their arm to distinguish themselves from superior fans like yourself.
How are you certain it’s this?
Not enough concrete details to tell yet. My understanding was that it would be a premium on top of the share price (at the time) but last night the article mentioned derivative contracts, don't know what they are honestly.Can someone explain this to me please.....
If SJR is buying a majority stake in Man Utd and keeps the Glazers on as minority share holders, would he then not have to use his own money to improve the clubs situation. I.e transfers, stadium, training facilities etc.
But then as the club becomes more valuable, so do their shares, so he then has to pay more to buy them out later? Unless there is a pre agreed price for their exit?
In which case why not just leave now?
I’d say 90% of the outrage is devastation at the Qatari bid failing channelled into a more socially acceptable LUHG brand of moaning.
Can someone explain this to me please.....
If SJR is buying a majority stake in Man Utd and keeps the Glazers on as minority share holders, would he then not have to use his own money to improve the clubs situation. I.e transfers, stadium, training facilities etc.
But then as the club becomes more valuable, so do their shares, so he then has to pay more to buy them out later? Unless there is a pre agreed price for their exit?
In which case why not just leave now?
Or people see through the phasing out and can see the bid for what it is?Without question.
The easy test is to imagine if news had broken last Summer that Ratcliffe was to take control of the club immediately with the Glazers remaining for a few years while being phased out entirely over a few years.
All the people acting hysterical and criticising Ratcliffe now would be hailing him as a saviour.
What's different now? Qatar. That's it.
Qatar need to learn from Malaga more so than PSG.
Without question.
The easy test is to imagine if news had broken last Summer that Ratcliffe was to take control of the club immediately with the Glazers remaining before being phased out entirely over a few years.
All the people acting hysterical and criticising Ratcliffe now would be hailing him as a saviour.
What's different now? Qatar. That's it.
He’s literally on camera saying as much about his Chelsea bid. I can’t think why he would suddenly drop that idea to plunder and asset strip his boyhood team.That is what we have to hope for. That for Brexit Jim and INEOS as a capitalist enterprise that this is not just a business venture but something he wants to have a legacy over.
If that’s the case the protests will continue.A few weeks ago the athletic podcast said the debt would remain under Ratcliffe, only Qatar has any intention of clearing it. Jim comes packaged with continued Glazers on the board for years to come and many more years debt payments. What a guy
Haha amazing. I now have mental images of him squinting into his old desktop screen on go daddy or square space with a copy of ‘HTML for dummies’ on his lap, wondering what to do with his widgets!!Haha, yep, he really did that. That's all he's done for the club.
I read it in the Athletic.
By the time he updated it for the first time, City had updated/modernised it 5 times during that time, presumably hiring people more qualified than ol' Kev to do it.
This is simply ludicrous. Who would pay 3-3.5bn for nothing? INEOS doesn’t do investing, it does buyouts.This is it. It’s basically SJR coming in as the front man publicly but really he’s just an investor. It’s likely a deal behind closed doors that the Glazers will still be in charge with Jimmy having a voting right on the board.
Without question.
The easy test is to imagine if news had broken last Summer that Ratcliffe was to take control of the club immediately with the Glazers remaining before being phased out entirely over a few years.
All the people acting hysterical and criticising Ratcliffe now would be hailing him as a saviour.
What's different now? Qatar. That's it.
Hey bro, just like everyone else I know nothing..I’m just trying to understand like the rest of us.
Educate us on what’s actually happening.
It is clearly the best option and they have no counter for it other than human rights abusers.No it's not. Not at all. It's the package of his current bid that makes people sceptical. Last summer people were up in arms about the rumours of him buying the club per se. But we had no idea of how he would finance and structure the deal. The reaction would have been the same.
Also I don't see how the Qatar plan for us isn't a valid reason for people to prefer their bid to what Ratcliffe has in mind.
I’d say 90% of the outrage is devastation at the Qatari bid failing channelled into a more socially acceptable LUHG brand of moaning.
No it's not. Not at all. It's the package of his current bid that makes people sceptical. Last summer people were up in arms about the rumours of him buying the club per se. But we had no idea of how he would finance and structure the deal. The reaction would have been the same.
Also I don't see how the Qatar plan for us isn't a valid reason for people to prefer their bid to what Ratcliffe has in mind.
Plans sound great but if they haven’t got the funds/competence/willingness to get a deal done then it’s just pie in the sky.
Not necessarily. Could be that some or all of the Glazers want to remain.Plans sound great but if they haven’t got the funds/competence/willingness to get a deal done then it’s just pie in the sky.
The Qatari's will be aware of that though. Either make an offer that convinces them to go or be more flexible about the arrangement to get a deal done, offering less per share for the club than the INEOS offer when they know that a couple of the Glazer siblings are unsure of selling is a waste of time.Not necessarily. Could be that some or all of the Glazers want to remain.
The Qatari's will be aware of that though. Either make an offer that convinces them to go or be more flexible about the arrangement to get a deal done, offering less per share for the club than the INEOS offer when they know that a couple of the Glazer siblings are unsure of selling is a waste of time.
The Qatari's will be aware of that though. Either make an offer that convinces them to go or be more flexible about the arrangement to get a deal done, offering less per share for the club than the INEOS offer when they know that a couple of the Glazer siblings are unsure of selling is a waste of time.
It’s a sad state of Utd in the end if this is trueJim is simply Glazers 2.0
Absolutely mate, spot onIt’s a sad state of Utd in the end if this is true
The club will be forever ridden with debts
the best thing for the club (imo) sorry to say if the club can resets itself by going to administration and start all over again in a clean state.
It’s better in the long run unfortunately.
It is clearly the best option and they have no counter for it other than human rights abusers.
This post is unhinged. Absolute brain dead nonsense.It’s a sad state of Utd in the end if this is true
The club will be forever ridden with debts
the best thing for the club (imo) sorry to say if the club can resets itself by going to administration and start all over again in a clean state.
It’s better in the long run unfortunately.
Jassim isn't a pedophile or a murderer mate. You're comparing a state to individuals.Well if it wasn't for the human rights abuses, the Qataris would be a great option. In the same way as Harald Shipman was so close to being remembered as a great doctor, and Jimmy Savile as a great marathon runner.
Oh dear, looks like you’ve slipped into denial again mate.I think if you're a pro-INEOS supporter and after the news that there is practically a deal in place is coming out. The Qatar side is absolutely silent. I'd be concerned by that if I was them.
Think it's becoming obvious that the media have no idea on Qatar's current position etc.
Do you think they'd just get beaten and then not try and put out stuff to counter it? No chance.Oh dear, looks like you’ve slipped into denial again mate.
I think if you're a pro-INEOS supporter and after the news that there is practically a deal in place is coming out. The Qatar side is absolutely silent. I'd be concerned by that if I was them.
Think it's becoming obvious that the media have no idea on Qatar's current position etc.
Jassim isn't a pedophile or a murderer mate. You're comparing a state to individuals.
I don’t see that there is much they can do about it if Raine aren’t talking to them and Sir Jim is in NY schmoozing. Direction of travel is all one way.Do you think they'd just get beaten and then not try and put out stuff to counter it? No chance.
So do you think that the people involved in the 92 Foundation are likely to have murdered or sexually abused young people directly like Harold Shipman or Jimmy Saville?I'm responding to your post dismissing human rights abuses as nothing. They aren't really though.
And if you think that Jassim's bid is just him as an individual then you're surely aware of your own cognitive dissonance. It is not possible that the 92 foundation is funded by anyone other than the Qatari state, for multiple reasons.
I don’t see that there is much they can do about it if Raine aren’t talking to them and Sir Jim is in NY schmoozing. Direction of travel is all one way.