There was no interest in selling then and they are very publicly into this process now. Very different scenario.Lot of people so certain Qatar will not walk away. They walked away in 2011.
I mean it could also just be that these are their actual opinions. Journalists don't solemnly swear to be 100% impartial all of the time, and nor should they.It depends on the writer to be honest.
Ornstein remains the best unbiased journalist. If tune in to talk of the devils podcasts then the hosts make their views a bit more clear on disliking the Qatar avenue from the two options available.
Though I agree they aren't meant to show their preference in articles, I think they get their leaks from Ratcliff easier than they would Qatar.
They approached the Glazers and were told it was not for sale.Lot of people so certain Qatar will not walk away. They walked away in 2011.
That’s what probably seals it. ME opportunities for NFL, maybe he offers a mall somewhere etc.You have no idea what Jassim has bid and any further possible incentives such as NFL openings and opportunities which could more than bridge any gap in hard cash
Ratcliffe brigade were sure this was sewn up a couple of days ago but it was always highly likely Qatar would just come back and blow them out of the water. If Qatar really want the club they will get it.
If you got the choice of your lottery win as either:
£3m up front
Or
£10k a month for 30 years (£3.6m)
What would you take?
Any sensible person would take the cash upfront as you’ve got it and can do what you want with it.
Therefore surely the Glazers will take the biggest pot the soonest……and get out of Dodge.
Doesn't look like they really want it.
What gives you that impressionDoesn't look like they really want it.
Putting in a new bud is now code for we’re walking awayI think it looks like they don't want to be taken for mugs, which is why they could possibly walk away.
Im not saying they aren't allowed to have opinions, but from the podcasts the Manchester based correspondents have already stated they arent close to the Jassim camp. Athletic based developments on the Qatar talks have tended to be broken by Ornstein really.
When they talk of developments (Crafton, Whitwell, which isn't really that often) it tends to be around Sir Jim's movements.
Most of the journalists seem to get better stories from one camp vs another.
Did you read my post?I mean it could also just be that these are their actual opinions. Journalists don't solemnly swear to be 100% impartial all of the time, and nor should they.
It's kind of sad seeing people throw a shit-fit just because the big bad journalists dare to criticise their preferred bidder.
It’s a very competitive/attractive offer.That's not great from SJ.
The Glazers don't care about what they do with the club once it's been bought. Why keep mentioning it?
Putting in a new bud is now code for we’re walking away
Apologies, I should have made it clearer that the shit-fit comment wasn't intended to be aimed at you. That was more towards those who get annoyed at the "journalists' agenda" any time a piece that is critical (or frankly, just not deferential) towards Jassim.Did you read my post?
I didnt say they can't have an opinion. I didn't say they can't air that opinion either. I never threw a shit fit either
Im just saying the Manchester correspondents aren't close to the Qatar camp.
So what would be the point of “Blowing Ratcliffe out of the water”What? Who said that? The bid is not "blowing Ineos out of the water." Qatar are not going to be fleeced by the Glazers.
Is that Mr Roades?Muppetiers guy says he anticipates a sale announcement tomorrow
Yeah.Is that Mr Roades?
So what would be the point of “Blowing Ratcliffe out of the water”
That’s the exact reason they are negotiating so hard on this.
That line was quite obviously a PR negotiation tactic aimed at JR to get him to play his hand
Interesting. Of the Twitter ITKs, I'd definitely say he's one of the more credible ones. In fairness, that by itself is saying very little.Yeah.
I get that but the notion that they may walk away is a bit daft now to be honest I think. I think we’re long past that point.That is the point I have been making all along! Some people here think Qatar will just go high. It was my response to that claim. Blimey!
Ah right no problem.Apologies, I should have made it clearer that the shit-fit comment wasn't intended to be aimed at you. That was more towards those who get annoyed at the "journalists' agenda" any time a piece that is critical (or frankly, just not deferential) towards Jassim.
I should have put that in a separate post; my main point of contention with your original comment was the implication that journalists are critical of Qatar because they receive more intel from Ratcliffe. I don't really buy that.
Those that believe Ratcliffe will get rid of the remaining glazers in a few years. Just months or so ago none predicted he’d be keeping them on.. now you’re certain in 2-3 years he’ll get rid of them?
Doesn't look like they really want it.
I'd be very worried if we get the Thickaris
Doesn't look like they really want it.
Interesting. Of the Twitter ITKs, I'd definitely say he's one of the more credible ones. In fairness, that by itself is saying very little.
I do at least think he has some degree of contact with somebody who has some degree of intel around the club, though I'm not sure I buy that he'd have much inside knowledge on the sale.
I get that but the notion that they may walk away is a bit daft now to be honest I think. I think we’re long past that point.
I’m worried for youI'd be very worried if we get the Thickaris
FixedLooking forward to the 9th round of bidding in July 2025