ShinjiNinja26
Full Member
Simon stone always goes for the most pessimistic view possible.
Simon stone always goes for the most pessimistic view possible.
Simon stone always goes for the most pessimistic view possible.
There's only six weeks of the season left.
There is a zero per cent chance of a sale being completed in six weeks!
Stone is realistic, no way this gets done before the end of the season.
Maybe no one will bid (up their bid). What then? Do they accept one of the previous bids or just walk?
Walk probably and re open it all again in 6 months would be a guess.
Their fortune has been built by their father. I'm sure the Glazer siblings can be perfectly foolish.
Written by Simon Chatbot
One final feck you to the fans
Never underestimate the other guys greed.Even with billions of losses at stake and reasonable advisors armed with logic?
Bit of a gamble isn't it?
If they stay, there will be no capital investment. So that outlay of work already apparently worth circa £2bn will cost even more then and be even further behind our rivals (Everton and Liverpool will have huge upgrades by then).
De Gea, Varane, Casemiro, Eriksen, Fernandes etc (many key players) will all need replacing by then. Another huge outlay for the 2025 bidders to make United competitive again.
INEOS already went for Chelsea, Qatar have interest in PL investment United or not. If both are turned away now, likelihood is both will buy into other PL clubs. This means that there's likely 2 more clubs who will be building better squads than us and serious competition to the top 4, and that they won't be returning as bidders for United in 2025.
The debts of.. £800m?... will all be bigger then and probably have surpassed £1bn
They'll have been told all this by their advisors. Bigger debts, worse squad, bigger capital investment required, bigger debts, more PL competition, the current serious bidders won't return.. This is all before we even think about what the fan backlash would be.
Make no mistake, their ultimate goal is to squeeze as much money out of United as they possibly can, whether all at once or over time. If they don't sell now for a World Record fee, there is absolutely no guarantee they are getting more down the road and are risking the possibility they could get much less.
Haha, I did countenance that possibility too!You're a braver man than me using the name Ruy López in a footie forum. I wanted to, then feared a "Who does he play for?" comment
Well that and the fact its not up to modern standards, thanks largely to the neglectful parasites who've let it rust away over the last 19 years. Its obviously a historic ground with a large capacity, but it's a relic compared to some of the other stadiums in the country.Not to defend the Glazers but I thought we weren't in the bid as we can't guarantee our stadium will be available then as we might be renovating or building a new one.
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?
Not to defend the Glazers but I thought we weren't in the bid as we can't guarantee our stadium will be available then as we might be renovating or building a new one.
Yep, it’s because the club is predicting they’ll be doing constructing and renovating on OT during that period.Not to defend the Glazers but I thought we weren't in the bid as we can't guarantee our stadium will be available then as we might be renovating or building a new one.
I mean it isn't good enough and it should of been redeveloped years ago and the only reason it needs such drastic redevelopment is because nothings been done for years.
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?
You have the inside scoop?They are staying
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?
United said they pulled out because they couldn't guarantee availability. But the suggestion was that even before that the Etihad was favoured because it was the more modern stadium.
Interesting to note that Anfield isn't included either for some reason, while the new Everton stadium that isn't complete yet is.
Is villa park on the list?
I had a mental image of Avram dancing to the Bee Gees before clicking thatMore like Staying alive
United said they pulled out because they couldn't guarantee availability. But the suggestion was that even before that the Etihad was favoured because it was the more modern stadium.
Interesting to note that Anfield isn't included either for some reason, while the new Everton stadium that isn't complete yet is.
I had a mental image of Avram dancing to the Bee Gees before clicking that
1. Wembley Stadium (London) (capacity 90,652)
2. Principality Stadium (Cardiff) (73,952)
3. Tottenham Hotspur Stadium (London) (62,322)
4. Etihad Stadium (Manchester) (61,000)
5. Everton Stadium (Liverpool) (52,679)
6. St James' Park (Newcastle) (52,305)
7. Villa Park (Birmingham) (52,190)
8. Hampden Park (Glasgow) (52,032)
9. Aviva Stadium (Dublin) (51,711)
10. Casement Park (Belfast) (34,500)
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?
No more than the other in the know's. Just my gut feelingYou have the inside scoop?
They’re trying to use time to their advantage here. Any new owner will want this transfer window so delaying it makes it more likely for them to up the bid and get to exclusive negotiations.