Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's only six weeks of the season left.

There is a zero per cent chance of a sale being completed in six weeks!
Stone is realistic, no way this gets done before the end of the season.

Yeah most likely. As long as it’s done for preseason I’ll be happy. We can’t let this drag on and disrupt our summer transfer plans.
 
The media know absolutely nothing…they proved that live on air during the last round of bids.

Ignore 100% of this garbage until an official announcement from the club.
 
Maybe no one will bid (up their bid). What then? Do they accept one of the previous bids or just walk?

I am sure the Raine guys would have spoken to the various parties to assess their bid's upward mobility after the 2nd bid was submitted. Who is in a stronger position to pay more and/or has a higher propensity to pay more?
And if I was the bidder, I would always plan for the worst and hope for the best. So there would have been multiple pathways for the multiple scenarios of how this deal would go.
 
Last edited:
Walk probably and re open it all again in 6 months would be a guess.

Doubt if they would do this again in 6 months. Raine probably won't do it for the Glazers as they wouldn't risk flipping through their Rolodex of clients to pitch. Besides the Glazers themselves would look foolish or desperate & weak.

A couple of years later when the economic conditions have improved -- and probably not with Raine.
 
Their fortune has been built by their father. I'm sure the Glazer siblings can be perfectly foolish.

The thing in business is that you always assume the opposition is smart as hell (and so you plan accordingly) -- until proven otherwise.

Only a naive person would enter negotiations thinking that the other side is dumb.
 
Bit of a gamble isn't it?

If they stay, there will be no capital investment. So that outlay of work already apparently worth circa £2bn will cost even more then and be even further behind our rivals (Everton and Liverpool will have huge upgrades by then).

De Gea, Varane, Casemiro, Eriksen, Fernandes etc (many key players) will all need replacing by then. Another huge outlay for the 2025 bidders to make United competitive again.

INEOS already went for Chelsea, Qatar have interest in PL investment United or not. If both are turned away now, likelihood is both will buy into other PL clubs. This means that there's likely 2 more clubs who will be building better squads than us and serious competition to the top 4, and that they won't be returning as bidders for United in 2025.

The debts of.. £800m?... will all be bigger then and probably have surpassed £1bn

They'll have been told all this by their advisors. Bigger debts, worse squad, bigger capital investment required, bigger debts, more PL competition, the current serious bidders won't return.. This is all before we even think about what the fan backlash would be.

Make no mistake, their ultimate goal is to squeeze as much money out of United as they possibly can, whether all at once or over time. If they don't sell now for a World Record fee, there is absolutely no guarantee they are getting more down the road and are risking the possibility they could get much less.

this is exactly it. Great post.
They’re going, i have 0 doubt, but as parasites do, they’ll suck every last drop they can before they just feck off once and for all
 
Wheres Harry? He's gone a little quiet since this last bit of info...

I think it's safe to say the Glazers will sell, but they, as we well know, want to squeeze every last bit of money from this sale. I don't think they have any intention of actually wanting to stay. Thats just my opinion though
 
So our crumbling stadium has been dropped from the Euro 2028 bid. No surprise but another reason why the Glazers need to go.
 
Surely the rules of the bidding process are known to the bidders. If the Glazers, or their advisors, are changing the rules mid-way the bidding process one would assume this might create dis-trust amongst the bidders, risking them to walk away. Seems rather incredible to add step by step to the bidding process without this being known beforehand to potential bidders.
 
Not to defend the Glazers but I thought we weren't in the bid as we can't guarantee our stadium will be available then as we might be renovating or building a new one.
Well that and the fact its not up to modern standards, thanks largely to the neglectful parasites who've let it rust away over the last 19 years. Its obviously a historic ground with a large capacity, but it's a relic compared to some of the other stadiums in the country.
 
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?

I mean it isn't good enough and it should of been redeveloped years ago and the only reason it needs such drastic redevelopment is because nothings been done for years.
 
Not to defend the Glazers but I thought we weren't in the bid as we can't guarantee our stadium will be available then as we might be renovating or building a new one.

I believe that club club withdrew OT from the bid due to possible the renovation process that might be occurring during that period.
 
Not to defend the Glazers but I thought we weren't in the bid as we can't guarantee our stadium will be available then as we might be renovating or building a new one.
Yep, it’s because the club is predicting they’ll be doing constructing and renovating on OT during that period.
It’s absolute nonsense
 
I mean it isn't good enough and it should of been redeveloped years ago and the only reason it needs such drastic redevelopment is because nothings been done for years.

That is of course correct. Not defending the Glazers at all here, but Ducker's assertion that OT "hasn't made" the shortlist implies that the stadium is so bad that it has been overlooked in favour of others - that is simply false.
 
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?

United said they pulled out because they couldn't guarantee availability. But the suggestion was that even before that the Etihad was favoured because it was the more modern stadium.

Interesting to note that Anfield isn't included either for some reason, while the new Everton stadium that isn't complete yet is.
 
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?

This is anti glazer not ABU, he's right.
 
United said they pulled out because they couldn't guarantee availability. But the suggestion was that even before that the Etihad was favoured because it was the more modern stadium.

Interesting to note that Anfield isn't included either for some reason, while the new Everton stadium that isn't complete yet is.

Is villa park on the list?
 
Is villa park on the list?

1. Wembley Stadium (London) (capacity 90,652)

2. Principality Stadium (Cardiff) (73,952)

3. Tottenham Hotspur Stadium (London) (62,322)

4. Etihad Stadium (Manchester) (61,000)

5. Everton Stadium (Liverpool) (52,679)

6. St James' Park (Newcastle) (52,305)

7. Villa Park (Birmingham) (52,190)

8. Hampden Park (Glasgow) (52,032)

9. Aviva Stadium (Dublin) (51,711)

10. Casement Park (Belfast) (34,500)
 
United said they pulled out because they couldn't guarantee availability. But the suggestion was that even before that the Etihad was favoured because it was the more modern stadium.

Interesting to note that Anfield isn't included either for some reason, while the new Everton stadium that isn't complete yet is.

Anfield’s pitch is a couple of cm shorter than the required size.
 
1. Wembley Stadium (London) (capacity 90,652)

2. Principality Stadium (Cardiff) (73,952)

3. Tottenham Hotspur Stadium (London) (62,322)

4. Etihad Stadium (Manchester) (61,000)

5. Everton Stadium (Liverpool) (52,679)

6. St James' Park (Newcastle) (52,305)

7. Villa Park (Birmingham) (52,190)

8. Hampden Park (Glasgow) (52,032)

9. Aviva Stadium (Dublin) (51,711)

10. Casement Park (Belfast) (34,500)

Cheers!

So it's not all about the modern stadiums then.
 
Embarrassing? Because it will potentially be under construction in ‘28? I don’t see it myself.
Nobody has said OT is not good enough. Let’s not let that get in the way of a ABU narrative though, eh Ducker?

The issue is that the construction should have been done already not that it might be getting done and the fact it wasn't/isn't likely being done under their stewardship of the club
 
They’re trying to use time to their advantage here. Any new owner will want this transfer window so delaying it makes it more likely for them to up the bid and get to exclusive negotiations.

Problem is like Stone has said it's now looking like it won't be sorted by end of season,therefore unable to have them in place for the summer transfer window.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.