BluesJr
Owns the moral low ground
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 9,319
Always an interesting position to take not wanting the best for your club.Worse?![]()
Always an interesting position to take not wanting the best for your club.Worse?![]()
Worse?![]()
It’s nothing to do with resources. Jim has put the maximum amount allowed into the club under PSR. We are literally losing too much money for them to correct by just putting their own money in.It's increasingly clear Jim doesn't have the resources to rectify this mess. Have said for a while now that the predicament the Glazers put United in would take an owner with lucrative access to capital to rectify. Jim is conventionally wealthy of course but its going to take substantially more to turn United around.
That's just from an operational standpoint to remain competitive, it doesn't intervene with the debt or the investment into the stadium. United needed an owner to first and foremost buy the remainder Glazers share values. Rid the debt, clearly outline the infrastructure in building the new stadium and recreationally invest money into the team in conjunction to the league rules.
I can't believe still bring out the 'Glazers/Ineos' don't spend nonsense
Not the pointThe Glazers have invested feck all in the club.
Not the point
Thank you for telling me what my point isYes it is
Ashworth wasn't even a club employee when INEOS (supposedly at Brailsford's insistence) decided to keep ETH.The biggest f up they’ve made was keeping ETH on in the summer, this led to us buying his players yet again, Zirkzee, Maz, De ligt, another 100 mil spent.
INEOS have seen the error which was caused by Ashworth and fecked him off.
In terms of January recruitment, I think there aren’t many players available who would improve us who we can afford right now. I mean we can’t even manage a 5 mil loan fee for tel.
I think they are doing the right thing not rushing into things. This season is over anyway. All it’s about now is getting the players accustomed to Ruben’s system. There’s gonna be pain lots of it from now until the end of the season. But I feel it’s the right way to go.
By the summer Ruben and the Ineos will know who suits the system and is willing to adjust. The others can be phased out, sold from the summer onwards. This is when we can start our proper recruitment.
I think we need to remember that Jim was and always will be the villain of the scenario. The intention behind a sale of the club by the Glazers was the best thing that has happened in the last 2 decades.
SJR did not rectify the most concurrent issue with the Glazer ownership firstly being their sole occupation and secondly the debt. The fact that those two issues remain which was the biggest incentive behind the clubs proposed sale speaks to how stale the real climate of the situation is. I've got nothing against SJR personally but he's a fraud.
He's conned the fans into thinking his miniscule stake is making a significant difference, he's barely got skin in the game and I'd honestly give INEOS a pass if they acquired the majority of the shares and then made poor decisions it's perfectly plausible given the dynamic of different ownership.
However, the stark contrast is it's still a Glazer ownership model, therefore, with having a minority stake the only way SJR could succeed is by hitting the ground running. This is simply a Glazer facelift situation, no different to when these car manufacturers milk the same models and use marketing to enterprise more interest when all that's changed is a new bumper or some ambient lighting in the foot passage wells.
INEOS are the Glazer facelift update, it's a total disgrace. All new improved version with stop start technology.
Yeah, Glazers gone at last forever, debt also at last gone forever, top players coming into the squad in every transfer window, CL football every year, state of the art stadium, so much worse you're right. Thank God we have top red Jim as Glazers partner instead.Much
Disappointed with this window. Our squad is pish and we can't score in a brothel but they have failed to secure a decent striker! Look at what we've been left with, you're not telling me that there's nothing better out there, I'm not having it.
Best in class they said, complete bollocks!
The biggest f up they’ve made was keeping ETH on in the summer, this led to us buying his players yet again, Zirkzee, Maz, De ligt, another 100 mil spent.
INEOS have seen the error which was caused by Ashworth and fecked him off.
In terms of January recruitment, I think there aren’t many players available who would improve us who we can afford right now. I mean we can’t even manage a 5 mil loan fee for tel.
I think they are doing the right thing not rushing into things. This season is over anyway. All it’s about now is getting the players accustomed to Ruben’s system. There’s gonna be pain lots of it from now until the end of the season. But I feel it’s the right way to go.
By the summer Ruben and the Ineos will know who suits the system and is willing to adjust. The others can be phased out, sold from the summer onwards. This is when we can start our proper recruitment.
Thank you for telling me what my point is
Only this time you have some people lapping it up.I see the "No value in the market' message has been developed with new words and same old bullshit.
Only this time you have some people lapping it up.
I think the Bicycle team they bought also fell off a cliff.![]()
Their successful project of Nice sits in 35 in europa league. Second from the bottom. No wonder they are not bothered with United embarrassing position.
The club's broke. I'm very skeptical of INEOS and not too pleased with their work to date, but the financial constraints facing the club are very real.It's a brilliant new strategy to leave the manager with two underwhelming strikers who can't score...
So incredibly frustrating how gullable many are
Amorim will fail without backing under these clowns.
Usually with each new manager, there is some sustained hope and excitement but I'm already mentally checked out. I don't put any blame on Amorim for that.
He could've just stayed thenYeah I feel so sorry coming here, poor guy wanted so much to see out season at Sporting
Do you still think we’ll sign somebody bud?Window closes tomorrow bud.
The club's broke. I'm very skeptical of INEOS and not too pleased with their work to date, but the financial constraints facing the club are very real.
Well we will see in hindsight I guess. If Dorku and Heaven turn out to be as influential as Evra and Vidic then it’ll be remembered well. Unless you aren’t talking specifically about the January window. In which case, disregard
It is frustrating. If I am playing devils advocate, I think we should reserve total judgement until the summer is done though. The briefs seem to be that we want to save as much money as possible to be as active as possible in the summer.
Fair - they would've known going into the winter window that we'd need a reinforcement up front and it doesn't feel like they did enough diligence on potential targets, and ended up leaving it late as usual.Some decent players left on loan like Muani. Not perfect but better what we have. There is no way to excuse leaving Amorim with Hojlund and Zirkzee as our only striker options .
That isn't actually true. There is no restriction on what an owner can invest. If a club is struggling with PSR\FPP only a portion of that investment will be taken into account.It’s nothing to do with resources. Jim has put the maximum amount allowed into the club under PSR. We are literally losing too much money for them to correct by just putting their own money in.
Amorim has maintained the whole time that it was one in one out in January, and shockingly, with Antony and Rashford, we saved roughly what we spent on Dorgu. I would imagine they asked which position he would prefer to upgrade and he asked for a wing back.
I’m surprised we couldn’t get a striker, but if Bayern were asking £5 million for a striker with no goals, we might as well have just kept Rashford.
ownership needs to step it up a bit. Summer window not looking great in retrospect, the decision to keep EtH was obviously a bad one in the moment, and has only been proven so far. Not finding some cheap loan deals to give some bodies is a joke. Had high hopes for them but been all over the place so far.
This brings us right back to the problem with minority ownership though. Unless the Glazers agree to a corresponding dilution of their equity, there's no logical reason for INEOS to invest more money and give the Glazers a free ride.That isn't actually true. There is no restriction on what an owner can invest. If a club is struggling with PSR\FPP only a portion of that investment will be taken into account.
So the owner could provide funding for infrastructure (no PSR impact), provide funding for debt reduction( a positive for PSR), leave funds in treasury to pay down our football debt as it falls due, which would greatly improve our cash flow going forward. Again no PSR impact here as the football debt relates to players already acquired and already costed in PSR.
The $300m investment wasn't really adequate, especially when it went to support a heavy summer expenditure on players.
Even that would be inadequate tbh. Transfer window planning should ideally start months before the window itself opens.The part I don't understand was why they weren't looking at loan deals from the moment window opened. Come on they must have been prepared for Rashford and Antony leaving
I’m wondering what this season would have looked like if we’d just stuck with Ruud for the remainder of it and let Ruben join in the summer as he originally wanted.
No mid season bedding in period to the new tactics, more money for transfers, no shitty 6 months hanging round his neck like a millstone going into next season.
With the benefit of hindsight, it’s another bad call by the senior management team.
Ah okHe could've just stayed then
We needed a complete debt clearing takeover. Trouble is the club is worth that much despite the debt it narrowed down who would bid, also the Glazers are greedy on a colossal scale. The fact we also need a new stadium and training facilities adds to the cost.This brings us right back to the problem with minority ownership though. Unless the Glazers agree to a corresponding dilution of their equity, there's no logical reason for INEOS to invest more money and give the Glazers a free ride.
Even that would be inadequate tbh. Transfer window planning should ideally start months before the window itself opens.
1) We could have sold Garnacho
2) We could have sold Mainoo
3) We could have signed a load of panic mercenaries on huge contracts
4) the Qataris could have bought us
But yeah it feels pretty bleak at the moment…
I’m wondering what this season would have looked like if we’d just stuck with Ruud for the remainder of it and let Ruben join in the summer as he originally wanted.
No mid season bedding in period to the new tactics, more money for transfers, no shitty 6 months hanging round his neck like a millstone going into next season.
With the benefit of hindsight, it’s another bad call by the senior management team.