Club ownership | Senior management team talk

Do you think the players feel this? While sweeping up 000s every week and the rest? Or ya reckon they couldnt give a shite aslong as they get paid?

Genuine question.

I'd say any with a conscince (like Bruno) are embarrassed to the core about everything. You want to be proud of who you work for and excited going forward, this isn't it. I can see another season of flirting with relegation if this is how they plan to turn things around. The mandate seems to be get rid of big earners and replace them with young inexperienced players, stock the youth with youth players about to break through at other PL clubs by offering them football and high wages, fine but using what data and recruitment? Nobody who moves the needle on or off the pitch is going to want to come here if they have other options
 
This is why people thought propping up the Glazers with a bunch of incompetent minority investors probably wasnt the best of ideas. But hey I guess those made redundant can console themselves with that moral high ground we're on.
 
yeah i feel like things are looking worse and worse. Any good will from early on is eroding fast for me with just bad decision after bad decision by INEOS. Some of which were extremely obvious. Bringing back EtH and spending money on his signings was just stupid as hell, and has put us in this mess.
 
yeah i feel like things are looking worse and worse. Any good will from early on is eroding fast for me with just bad decision after bad decision by INEOS. Some of which were extremely obvious. Bringing back EtH and spending money on his signings was just stupid as hell, and has put us in this mess.

Would you be happy if Amorim is sacked this summer?

Or would you be happy if we made no summer signings?
 
i hope we apply this same rigourous cost saving approach to when we go cap in hand to the govt for public money for the new stadium.
They aren't going to ask for public money for the new stadium and even if they did they wouldn't get it
 
When I read stuff like this it always reminds me how disconnected football - and seemingly now fans - are from what a “club” is supposed to be.

Manchester United fans cheering staff at the club losing the canteen/lunch. Crazy stuff
They aren't losing their canteen or lunch, all that is happening is the menu has been restricted to soup and a sandwich instead of a full meal
 
If you take away the sentimentality of being a supporter, all you're left with is a feeling of disgust towards an organisation owned by dispictable leeches
 


Despicable is the right word

The Glazers are scum.

However, their latest enabler was fully aware of who he was getting in bed with. The books and the facilities were opened for him and he knew very well what was in store. To believe that he got a shock and had "no option but to do it after seeing things" is simply bullshit and an attempt to give him a pass. Jim is not a victim.

One thing: Wasn't his remit to take care of the football operations? When did it change to Manchester Elon Musk?
 
The Glazers are scum.

However, their latest enabler was fully aware of who he was getting in bed with. The books and the facilities were opened for him and he knew very well what was in store. To believe that he got a shock and had "no option but to do it after seeing things" is simply bullshit and an attempt to give him a pass. Jim is not a victim.

One thing: Wasn't his remit to take care of the football operations? When did it change to Manchester Elon Musk?

This. INEOS knew exactly what they were getting into
 
Ineos are just embarrassing at this stage. They're either clueless or are being intentionally cruel. Really interested to see how much of a dent these cuts will make over the next 1 to 5 years.

Even Woodward would have just resolved all this with a new tea cup sponsor or something.
 
I just googled and Utd have 1,100 employees vs 520 at City. Is that right or is there more nuance to it?
The City Football Group have 1,700 or so, which needs to be considered. I haven't seen a piece of journalism that analyses that workforce in depth, but The Athletic suggest a lot of work at the City Group benefits City.
 
Sky Sports headline made me laugh I admit.

"ManUtd: 200 more redundancies possible and free lunches to end."

Why chuck in the free lunches in.

Terrible news though! Things are pretty grim around the club.
 
The Glazers are scum.

However, their latest enabler was fully aware of who he was getting in bed with. The books and the facilities were opened for him and he knew very well what was in store. To believe that he got a shock and had "no option but to do it after seeing things" is simply bullshit and an attempt to give him a pass. Jim is not a victim.

One thing: Wasn't his remit to take care of the football operations? When did it change to Manchester Elon Musk?
He has publicly said twice what wonderful people they are
 
The Glazers are scum.

However, their latest enabler was fully aware of who he was getting in bed with. The books and the facilities were opened for him and he knew very well what was in store. To believe that he got a shock and had "no option but to do it after seeing things" is simply bullshit and an attempt to give him a pass. Jim is not a victim.

One thing: Wasn't his remit to take care of the football operations? When did it change to Manchester Elon Musk?
FT1801-c-@nadhimzahawi.jpg
Liam Byrne left a note.
 
yeah i feel like things are looking worse and worse. Any good will from early on is eroding fast for me with just bad decision after bad decision by INEOS. Some of which were extremely obvious. Bringing back EtH and spending money on his signings was just stupid as hell, and has put us in this mess.

Yep, and don't forget the money that they then had to spend on sacking him

The wages of the likes of Case/Rash etc

Feels like Ineos are destroying us even further. Feel sorry for the employees, who are probably on very low wages, who are affected

Hope the players feel embarrassed they continue to stroll around collecting their big wages while the low paid employees are sent up the river by ineos
 
Ineos are just embarrassing at this stage. They're either clueless or are being intentionally cruel. Really interested to see how much of a dent these cuts will make over the next 1 to 5 years.

Even Woodward would have just resolved all this with a new tea cup sponsor or something.
Seems that way. Refusing Bruno to cover staff expenses shows its their message rather than the situation
 
It's honestly pretty disgusting and I've lost all faith with them at this point. You want to be able to admire and respect the club you love and they're doing practically everything in their power to tarnish that.

Could you imagine being an employee at Utd knowing they pissed 10+million up the wall on Ashworth & Hag.. then facing all these cuts, work life benefits, at fear of losing your job and knowing that all of these cuts combined probably doesn't even pay for that incompetence.

I get people are coping hard and want Ineos to be a success but crikey, wake up and smell the coffee.
 
That’s exactly why I can understand what Ineos are trying to do. It’s not a good look, but the business need to be profitable. The sporting side of business need the business side to be lean and stable. Both sides need each other.

The right party to point a finger at are the Glazers.

I will always point fingers at INEOS for offering a deal that kept these leeches in place
 
This is why people thought propping up the Glazers with a bunch of incompetent minority investors probably wasnt the best of ideas. But hey I guess those made redundant can console themselves with that moral high ground we're on.

Yeah thanks to these greedy leeches our only alternative to Glineos minority ownership was a Sheikh who couldn't pass proof of funds test
 
Yep, and don't forget the money that they then had to spend on sacking him

The wages of the likes of Case/Rash etc

Feels like Ineos are destroying us even further. Feel sorry for the employees, who are probably on very low wages, who are affected

Hope the players feel embarrassed they continue to stroll around collecting their big wages while the low paid employees are sent up the river by ineos

Yeah you can see exactly why reliable journos are talking about a toxic work environment. I wouldn't want to be anywhere near the place by the sounds of what's going on
 
Why on earth are people getting free meals anyway? Bring your own dinner in like literally every other person in employment does.
 
If you take away the sentimentality of being a supporter, all you're left with is a feeling of disgust towards an organisation owned by dispictable leeches

Absolutely disgusted, treating loyal staff with utter contempt is completely out of order. We need someone mega wealthy to buy Glineos out before they leave us with nothing.
 
I think the thing with the transfers is that it's a bit of hindsight really. I don't think that the transfers we made in the summer were massive overpays at the time. You can question the scouting or whether they were the right type of players for us but I think just in terms of fees it was probably an improvement on our previous outlay.

Its not hindsight. All these players had question marks
  • De ligt didn't make the cut at Juventis or Bayern. He hadnt had a good season in years. So why did we buy him ? A lot of UTD fans had reservations about him
  • Ugarte has been decent but there's a reason PSG sold him. He's limited in terms of distribution, driving the ball through midfield and controlling tempo. You can look at Neves who PSG bought to replace him, he's a more complete player. There's a reason Bruno is playing as a CM because none of our CMs are good at bringing the ball up the field. This is a position where you get a complete player.
  • Zirkzee another young player with potential. He was never a proven goal scorer. Your backup to your unproven striker can't be another unproven striker. And you look at his game he's not a no 9, more of a 10. This is something good scouting should have picked up
  • Yoro - we paid a huge fee for potnetial. I don't mind this one as much as the others. But he was more a long term fix rather than someone who would immediately transform the defence. This is one is defensible.
 
In terms of the footballing side, mistakes should be allowed to be made. No football club gets 100% of their decisions correct. This is why it is disingenuous to use these redundancies as a stick to beat the club with because we made a bad footballing decision (appointing Ashworth for example).
 
Ineos are just embarrassing at this stage. They're either clueless or are being intentionally cruel. Really interested to see how much of a dent these cuts will make over the next 1 to 5 years.

Even Woodward would have just resolved all this with a new tea cup sponsor or something.
Basically feck all impact I would guess. They are taking the sort of measures a normal business might take to reduce costs but in a normal business these things might represent a much higher proportion of outgoings. In this case the debt and player wages make up the vast majority of outgoings so it all feels fairly futile
 
That’s exactly why I can understand what Ineos are trying to do. It’s not a good look, but the business need to be profitable. The sporting side of business need the business side to be lean and stable. Both sides need each other.

The right party to point a finger at are the Glazers.
Clear the debts to stop the interest/coupon payments, put a moratorium on looting the club, stop wasting money on expensive duds, stop chasing, hiring and firing director of football's: that's the stuff the fans can get behind to streamline the operation and turn the business profitable. Cutting on scotch tapes and lunches is hardly going to change our fortunes.

Edit: In reality there are no "free" lunches. Those are part of the benefit package and the companies gives them as incentive to save time from people going out for lunch, which works out to the companies benefit eventually. So when a management stops a lunch program they are basically reducing the benefit for the common employee while they continue on their splurges.
 
Its not hindsight. All these players had question marks
  • De ligt didn't make the cut at Juventis or Bayern. He hadnt had a good season in years. So why did we buy him ? A lot of UTD fans had reservations about him
  • Ugarte has been decent but there's a reason PSG sold him. He's limited in terms of distribution, driving the ball through midfield and controlling tempo. You can look at Neves who PSG bought to replace him, he's a more complete player. There's a reason Bruno is playing as a CM because none of our CMs are good at bringing the ball up the field. This is a position where you get a complete player.
  • Zirkzee another young player with potential. He was never a proven goal scorer. Your backup to your unproven striker can't be another unproven striker. And you look at his game he's not a no 9, more of a 10. This is something good scouting should have picked up
  • Yoro - we paid a huge fee for potnetial. I don't mind this one as much as the others. But he was more a long term fix rather than someone who would immediately transform the defence. This is one is defensible.
Again you are talking about whether they were good signings or not which I think is debatable but from a financial point of view I didn't feel like we went crazy apart from for Yoro