Im no FFP expert but I think the amortisation is only for FFP purposes no? Transfer fees and how they are structured are very unlikely to be equally spread across a 5 year period. Many release clauses are upfront payments (unless teams negotiate otherwise, eg. pay slightly more but in instalments which I think Chelsea did for Enzo maybe?) and many teams also need cash quickly so will sell for a slightly lower fee for the upfront cash.
Notransfer fees are now used as a net accounting figure, everything is done yearly so if you are only making an anual payment it goes on your book yearly as do wages. The new FSP rules from UEFA state that this summer we can only spend 80% of our current financial year, so end of June 23 to 1st July 24 is period used to measure Revenue. So for example if our revenue is £650m (current prediction) and wages are just announced at £331m.
The club would be allowed to spend 80% of that figure on our yearly accounts which include
wages, amortised transfer debt, expenses, Net Summer Transfer Fees and Agent Fees.
Eighty per cent of £650m is
£520m is the threshold and we know that wages are
£331m, we also know that the club owe huge debts in transfer fees to other clubs probably
£96m per year for the next 4 or 5 years(These are transfers like M Mount, Antony, Casemiro etc where we still owe 3 installments of €20m just for Antony!)
That’s a spend of £427m now add the cost of paying off Richard Arnold(5.6m), paying fees for the takeover to Raine group ($31/£24m) and Dan Ashworth (10m) that would mean the club even with Ratcliffe investment which helps us with the 3 year loss rule that the club probably is at about
£470-475m against an allowance of £520m leaving a yearly allowance of £45-50m. Now if we bought 4 players for £200m on 5 year contracts we would be within in the rules providing we released players that freed up wages to make sure new players wages fitted into the £331m.
Example we bought M Olise for £55m and Sold DVB £8m. The club still owes Ajax £8m of the £40m agreed over 5 years so this would. Be a transfer neutral however the club would now save his wages of £6m per year.
So agreeing wages of M Olise of £6m per year means that the player goes on the yearly accounts at £11m transfer fee and £6m wages so combined cost of £17m, however the wages would be compensated by selling DVB and no longer paying his wages.
if the club sold a player like Mason Greenwood for £25m, this is 100% profit even though we may agree five year instalment payment scheme because the club has no historic cost of the player in their books. Instead of a £200m budget by selling Mason the budget would be nearer to £300m so selling academy players gives the club a huge potential transfer window.
https://www.uefa.com/returntoplay/n...a-s-new-financial-sustainability-regulations/
Click the link and it will explain the 80% rule this summer, next summer it’s 70%, the PL are trying to introduce 85%.