neverdie
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2018
- Messages
- 3,004
A great upheaval is coming. Climate-driven movement of people is adding to a massive migration already under way to the world’s cities. The number of migrants has doubled globally over the past decade, and the issue of what to do about rapidly increasing populations of displaced people will only become greater and more urgent. To survive climate breakdown will require a planned and deliberate migration of a kind humanity has never before undertaken.
The world already sees twice as many days where temperatures exceed 50C than 30 years ago – this level of heat is deadly for humans, and also hugely problematic for buildings, roads and power stations. It makes an area unliveable. This explosive planetary drama demands a dynamic human response. We need to help people to move from danger and poverty to safety and comfort – to build a more resilient global society for everyone’s benefit.
Large populations will need to migrate, and not simply to the nearest city, but also across continents. Those living in regions with more tolerable conditions, especially nations in northern latitudes, will need to accommodate millions of migrants while themselves adapting to the demands of the climate crisis. We will need to create entirely new cities near the planet’s cooler poles, in land that is rapidly becoming ice-free. Parts of Siberia, for example, are already experiencing temperatures of 30C for months at a time.
Get the Guardian’s award-winning long reads sent direct to you every Saturday morning
Arctic forests are burning, with mega-blazes devouring Siberia, Greenland and Alaska. Even in January, peat fires were burning in the Siberian cryosphere, despite temperatures below –50C. These zombie fires smoulder year round in the peat below ground, in and around the Arctic Circle, only to burst into huge blazes that rage across the boreal forests of Siberia, Greenland, Alaska and Canada.
In 2019, colossal fires destroyed more than 4m hectares of Siberian taiga forest, blazing for more than three months, and producing a cloud of soot and ash as large as the countries that make up the entire European Union. Models predict that fires in the boreal forests and Arctic tundra will increase by up to four times by 2100.
Wherever you live now, migration will affect you and the lives of your children. It is predictable that Bangladesh, a country where one-third of the population lives along a sinking, low-lying coast, is becoming uninhabitable. (More than 13 million Bangladeshis – nearly 10% of the population – are expected to have left the country by 2050.) But in the coming decades wealthy nations will be severely affected, too.
This upheaval occurs not only at a time of unprecedented climate change but also of human demographic change. Global population will continue to rise in the coming decades, peaking at perhaps 10 billion in the 2060s. Most of this increase will be in the tropical regions that are worst hit by climate catastrophe, causing people there to flee northwards. The global north faces the opposite problem – a “top-heavy” demographic crisis, in which a large elderly population is supported by a too-small workforce. North America and Europe have 300 million people above the traditional retirement age (65+), and by 2050, the economic old-age dependency ratio there is projected to be at 43 elderly persons per 100 working persons aged 20–64. Cities from Munich to Buffalo will begin competing with each other to attract migrants.
An aerial view of Fairbourne village in Gwynedd, north Wales, expected to be abandoned by 2045. Photograph: Kirsty Wigglesworth/AP
The coming migration will involve the world’s poorest fleeing deadly heatwaves and failed crops. It will also include the educated, the middle class, people who can no longer live where they planned because it’s impossible to get a mortgage or property insurance; because employment has moved elsewhere. The climate crisis has already uprooted millions in the US – in 2018, 1.2 million were displaced by extreme conditions, fire, storms and flooding; by 2020, the annual toll had risen to 1.7 million people. The US now averages a $1bn disaster every 18 days.
More than half of the western US is facing extreme drought conditions, and farmers in Oregon’s Klamath Basin talk about illegally using force to open dam gates for irrigation. At the other extreme, fatal floods have stranded thousands of people from Death Valley to Kentucky. By 2050, half a million existing US homes will be on land that floods at least once a year, according to data from Climate Central, a partnership of scientists and journalists. Louisiana’s Isle de Jean Charles has already been allocated $48m of federal tax dollars to move the entire community due to coastal erosion and rising sea levels; in Britain, the Welsh villagers of Fairbourne have been told their homes should be abandoned to the encroaching sea as the entire village is to be “decommissioned” in 2045. Larger coastal cities are at risk, too. Consider that the Welsh capital, Cardiff, is projected to be two-thirds underwater by 2050.
https://www.theguardian.com/news/20...sis-migration-why-we-need-plan-great-upheaval
if they invest properly they can avoid the doomsday scenarios and keep the level between 1.5-2. if it moves to 2, it'll take decades of zero carbon output, maybe a couple of generations or more, for it to decline again. but that is a better scenario than doing nothing now because if it moves beyond 2 or >2.5 then we may as well all just kill each other now to save time.
it's mental to think that every government has the full knowledge that this is happening and will kill them as well as their children but aren't acting quick enough. it needs wartime economic urgency. the world has to be in a different position regarding its energy input and output by 2030 or there won't be much to look at in 2050. and it's doable but you have to start now. this should be dominating the agenda globally. it makes everything else seem pointless in comparison.
https://www.euronews.com/2019/11/18...ation-says-nobel-winning-economist-joseph-stiThe Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz has called on global leaders to tackle climate change with the same determination that previous generations applied to warfare.
Stiglitz described climate change as “an attack on our on our world as we know it”. And he told Euronews that mobilising resources to confront the problem is now an urgent necessity.
“When we went into World War Two did anyone say, can we afford it?” argues Stiglitz. “You know, I don't remember anybody saying, oh, let's surrender to the Germans because it'll cost us too much to fight. Well, we're fighting a war which is at the heart of our existence, of our standard of living. You know, in the United States, we've been losing close to 2 percent of GDP every year. You know, the fires, the floods, the hurricanes, the freezing episodes.”
A new social contract is needed
In his new book “A Bit of Everything: Power, People, Profits and Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent”, Professor Stiglitz argues that capitalism needs to be transformed if it is to meet the challenge of creating a more equal society.
Joseph StiglitzCapitalism will be part of the story, but it can't be the kind of capitalism that we've had for the last 40 years.
Nobel Prize-winning economist
“We need a new social contract between the market, the state and civil society,” he says. “Capitalism will be part of the story, but it can't be the kind of capitalism that we've had for the last 40 years. It can't be the kind of selfish, unfettered capitalism where firms just maximize shareholder value regardless of the social consequences. When you do that, you end up with what's happened in the United States, not only inequality, but you have the opioid crisis. Life expectancy is on decline. You had the food crises, childhood diabetes. The food companies are exploiting our young people. You have companies like Exxon denying that there's climate change. You have the cigarette companies denying that there is evidence, compelling evidence that cigarettes are bad for your health. You know, there's instance after instance of what could only be called reprehensible, immoral behaviour.”
A return to the political fray?
A Democrat, Stiglitz was chair of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers. And he says he is ready to accept a return to the political fray, if he is invited.
that was 3 years ago. this is more serious than covid yet less urgency.