I've never both totally agreed and disagreed with a post like the ones from @Cait Sith.
I definitely think that if the big polluters (China, India, US and soon Indonesia and Brazil) don't drastically cut the CO2 emission, then whatever Europe do will mean next to nothing. I also think that the solution is not using less energy, but making incentives to use CO2-free produced energy, be it solar, fission and hopefully soon fusion. Some people going vegetarians and the random Joe not going to holidays in Thailand will mean feck all in grand scheme of things. Instead put a shitload of money on alternative energies, that has to be the only long-term solution.
Also, the protests were very politicised (especially in US) which gave (rightfully so) the right wing media a clear day on calling it a sham.
I definitely think that if the big polluters (China, India, US and soon Indonesia and Brazil) don't drastically cut the CO2 emission, then whatever Europe do will mean next to nothing. I also think that the solution is not using less energy, but making incentives to use CO2-free produced energy, be it solar, fission and hopefully soon fusion. Some people going vegetarians and the random Joe not going to holidays in Thailand will mean feck all in grand scheme of things. Instead put a shitload of money on alternative energies, that has to be the only long-term solution.
Also, the protests were very politicised (especially in US) which gave (rightfully so) the right wing media a clear day on calling it a sham.
Last edited: