Players already plotting their backdoor escape
Yeah, you're right. But still something similar should be done of some sort. They will just find ways to bend the rules and political pressure will always be in the air with that lot.That wasn't Premier League led. Abromovich's assets were seized by western governments because of the Ukraine War. They're not that comparable.
To be fair, they'd be stupid if they didn't.Players already plotting their backdoor escape
It’s in his name, 88 inches.How tall are you?
Exactly, there are 35 charges of failing to comply. They might be able to weasel their way out of a lot of the other charges through their corrupt ways but surely, SURELY not out of failing to comply. I mean if you're 100% sure you're innocent why fail to comply anyway? The whole thing stinks and hopefully justice will be served.They are guilty of the 'failure to comply' ones at the very minimum. There will be a points deduction for those alone.
Nothing because that would be incredibly stupid by them.Exactly, there are 35 charges of failing to comply. They might be able to weasel their way out of a lot of the other charges through their corrupt ways but surely, SURELY not out of failing to comply. I mean if you're 100% sure you're innocent why fail to comply anyway? The whole thing stinks and hopefully justice will be served.
What worries me is the UK governments involvement in all of this, we already know of one meeting between them and Abu Dhabi officials where the minutes were not revealed. Who knows what's going on and being pulled behind the scenes.
Let's hope you're right and all 115/130 charges stick. Time will tell.Nothing because that would be incredibly stupid by them.
It wouldn't make sense to let it get to this stage if they were going to cut some kind of deal behind closed doors. It would just get swept under the carpet long ago.
What worries me is the UK governments involvement in all of this, we already know of one meeting between them and Abu Dhabi officials where the minutes were not revealed. Who knows what's going on and being pulled behind the scenes.
Ha of course, how could I be so naive.Sir Keir Starmer is an Arsenal fan though so surely City losing this will be good for him
Nothing because that would be incredibly stupid by them.
It wouldn't make sense to let it get to this stage if they were going to cut some kind of deal behind closed doors. It would just get swept under the carpet long ago.
I don't see how they can let them off with a slap on the wrist considering the penalties handed to Everton and Forest.Can we please have a ban on anyone chucking out hysterical 'they'll be let off with a tickle' posts.
The panel will decide on the balance of probability whether they are guilty. It would be ridiculous to have taken it this far if there were not a strong case against them.
Also, please not one more factually impossible misinformed claim such as they'll appeal to CAS' or 'the FA will....'
You don't have to hand out titles to 2nd place after stripping them. It should just be a blank in the history books. Which is unfortunate but the right thing to do.
The badge, after some serious thought, should be the city mack daddy sat in the floor in the middle of a room, In the midst of a bukake party, with the words 'in oil we we trust' up top, and the Roman ' maximus wankus' at the bottom.I think a fitting punishment should be all of the title and relegation stuff, but with a forced name change to 'cheating bastards fc'.
I'll take suggestions as to the badge imagery.
Something that crosses my mind regularly is during an Etihad Stadium tour in January 2023, the tour guide was taking us around the ground and as we come into eye shot of the owners box, he said "He has only ever attended one game as he is a busy man, who can guess which game that was?", and it just blew me away how normal it was to the City fans that their owner just didn't bother getting on his 500m pound jet and flying over more than once.That's just not true with Roman, he attended hundreds of games during his time owning Chelsea.
No idea about Man City's owners but Abramovic obviously had an interest in the football.
So he's just like the rest of their "fans" then. Not showing up at the stadium.Something that crosses my mind regularly is during an Etihad Stadium tour in January 2023, the tour guide was taking us around the ground and as we come into eye shot of the owners box, he said "He has only ever attended one game, as he is a busy man, who can guess which game that was?", and it just blew me away how normal it was to the City fans that their owner just didn't bother getting on his 500m pound jet and flying over more than once.
Literally all of them will go. There will be maybe one or two players who could be tempted by some money, but it will be the less important players.If that blessed day came to be, who do we think would escape the sinking ship ? Ederson, B. Silva, KdB, Rodri for sure. Then maybe loan out Dias. Would be curious to see how Haaland escapes it with maybe only Barca and Bayern able to take him on.
Doubt it.Literally all of them will go. There will be maybe one or two players who could be tempted by some money, but it will be the less important players.
KDB, Ederson, Silva, Rodri, Haaland, Dias, Gvordiol, Stones, Ake, Akanji, Grealish.
Haaland will end up at either Barcelona or PSG.
There might be some martyr like Walker.
I doubt we take any first team players, but hopefully we raid their youth system, most of the young lads would find it easier just coming to us instead of moving across the country.
Politics and sport should have not been mixed. If City are not be punished, they need to be putting a foot down that the club must be sold or be excluded from any FA related competitions.
No state ownership as politics can then creep in. If Roman basically had to sell Chelsea, there should be a similar outcome for City so fair play can't be brought into question.
The only one that might stay would be Foden.Literally all of them will go. There will be maybe one or two players who could be tempted by some money, but it will be the less important players.
KDB, Ederson, Silva, Rodri, Haaland, Dias, Gvordiol, Stones, Ake, Akanji, Grealish.
Haaland will end up at either Barcelona or PSG.
There might be some martyr like Walker.
I doubt we take any first team players, but hopefully we raid their youth system, most of the young lads would find it easier just coming to us instead of moving across the country.
And rightly so to be honest. I think the other 19 would be within their rights to take their ball and go and play somewhere else if it turns out the premier league isn’t fit to uphold the rules everyone else has agreed to.I don't see how they can let them off with a slap on the wrist considering the penalties handed to Everton and Forest.
The PL have already been threatened with the Super League. They're not stupid. They know the other clubs will be in uproar if they let them off and they keep dominating.
Take your blinkers off ladWe are privately owned and that's simply a fact.
We are privately owned and that's simply a fact.
Take your blinkers off lad
Take your blinkers off lad
That's if they're still City's to sell. I wonder whether any players have the right to terminate their contracts in the event of a significant breach of their contract by City, and whether this situation would be a significant breach under the contract terms?Doubt it.
If it's just for one season, I reckon City will sell a couple of players, loan a few, and keep a team that guarantees promotion. I also believe Pep will stay out of pride, then leave after the promotion.
There'll only be a clear out if it's more than one season sort of thing. No way City would allow it as losing all their stars would set them back a decade.
I'll be incredibly surprised if they're stripped of past titles, as someone above alluded to, that would result in an absolute omnishambles of litigation by all the wronged parties - clubs, players, betting companies, sponsors etc. etc. and so on. The PL will surely be keen to avoid that.You don't have to hand out titles to 2nd place after stripping them. It should just be a blank in the history books. Which is unfortunate but the right thing to do.
That would be the most principle move to make, strip them of every silverware they've won in that time, cast them out of the league for at least 10 years.I'll be incredibly surprised if they're stripped of past titles, as someone above alluded to, that would result in an absolute omnishambles of litigation by all the wronged parties - clubs, players, betting companies, sponsors etc. etc. and so on. The PL will surely be keen to avoid that.
That would be the most principle move to make, strip them of every silverware they've won in that time, cast them out of the league for at least 10 years.
In Italian football it's been done to the most prestigious teams like Juve and both Milans, if the EPL can't do that to City, then United should stop obeying every rule and use their finances how they choose.
I’ll also be incredibly surprised If clubs are not already lining up to try and get compensation once\if City are found guilty. Whilst stripping of titles will most likely make it easier I don’t think it compensation will be dependent on that.I'll be incredibly surprised if they're stripped of past titles, as someone above alluded to, that would result in an absolute omnishambles of litigation by all the wronged parties - clubs, players, betting companies, sponsors etc. etc. and so on. The PL will surely be keen to avoid that.
Yes Clubs should sue the hell out of those oil spillage cnuts to the last dime.I’ll also be incredibly surprised If clubs are not already lining up to try and get compensation once\if City are found guilty. Whilst stripping of titles will most likely make it easier I don’t think it compensation will be dependent on that.
Did that happen in Serie A?I'll be incredibly surprised if they're stripped of past titles, as someone above alluded to, that would result in an absolute omnishambles of litigation by all the wronged parties - clubs, players, betting companies, sponsors etc. etc. and so on. The PL will surely be keen to avoid that.
Bigger question here is, do City spend more onWe are privately owned and that's simply a fact.
If you are talking about City, poster, I have bad news for you. There is no “we”.We are privately owned and that's simply a fact.
I guess they are privately owned, by some fella named Abu Dhabi
Bigger question here is, do City spend more on
1. Sponsoring themselves OR
2. Making fake sponsors OR
3. The paid actors from Asia and the Middle east to come fill the seats in the Ethihad OR
4. The consultancy jobs the give to players in order to beef up the contracts as part of a loop hole OR
5. Cooking the books by making questionable signings between sister clubs like Girona?
Only City fans can sit with their brass necks and have this belief that everything has been done fairly. If it was done fairly, every club would do it. But in my opinion, the only way City felt confident there would be no punishment is because they are, who they are.