It’s one thing to not constantly have a pop at Grealish, but I do find that the opposite tends to happen. Not only are they not calling out his apparent attitude problems, (also evidentially linked to drinking issues) but they do the opposite. He’s still hailed, celebrated and championed to the hills, ‘should be in the England setup’ etc. He’s one of the worst transfers in PL history and also of questionable attitude, and my issue is not that he is not mentioned at all (due to difference in profile/success between City and United), but when he IS mentioned, it is never negatively.
Lingard has been labelled for a long time, and if you said he presented his drinking problem as an ‘excuse’, then I can only imagine he used it long after people labelled him and grouped him in the ‘Lingard and Pogba’ group, because he didn’t need an ‘excuse’ until things got really bad for him before he left United. Before then, he was in the United and England team, and seen as a clown rather than a model, hardworking pro. He absolutely hasn’t earned any narrative around him because he’s supposed to be a drunk.