Shane88
Actually Nostradamus
I always forget about that behind the keeper rule. It's dumb.
Nah you have to have two players between you and the goal to be onside.
Did not look like the linesman signaled offside, but rather a freekick in the box. Foul on Karius?Can a player be offside if the ball came back off a Liverpool player (Milner)?
City have been screwed out of a deserved second goal there
It's rehearsed stuff. A lot of overloads on the left is the only tactic really. Not easy to stop though.City's play is so predictable.
That's correct, but the ball came off Milner. So it shouldn't be counted as a new "phase" of play. Therefore Sané was onside.Doesn’t the goal keeper and a player need to be behind the line? It’s a good decision.
That was offside because the rules state that there must be 2 players playing the attacker onside. Usually we forget about the keeper because he’s way back on his line and only think about the defender, but Karius was way out in the mix in that scenario and there was only one player playing Sane onside.Explain it.
Go on...
To park the bus which is a suicidal tactic.Completely awful half. What was the game plan here?
Clearly you don't...Does no one here know the offside rule?
Commentators don't know the offside rule
That was offside because the rules state that there must be 2 players playing the attacker onside. Usually we forget about the keeper because he’s way back on his line and only think about the defender.
It came off a Liverpool player though...failThat was offside because the rules state that there must be 2 players playing the attacker onside. Usually we forget about the keeper because he’s way back on his line and only think about the defender.
Guardiola being a bitch