That means absolutely zilch.
The winner is the team that puts one more ball than their opponent in the net.
Sure. But it has to be non offside.
That means absolutely zilch.
The winner is the team that puts one more ball than their opponent in the net.
Only if it's "intentional"Is Philip Walton on crack?
If the ball is played into the goalscorer's path by an opposition player, it's onside whether it was accidental or otherwise. The rule has always been that way, right?
I can’t believe he said that shite with a straight face. Talking straight out of his bungholeIs Philip Walton on crack?
If the ball is played into the goalscorer's path by an opposition player, it's onside whether it was accidental or otherwise. The rule has always been that way, right?
BT have decided Liverpool should be 2-0 up yet Madrid are the only side the have legitimately scored a goal.
I'm so sick of Liverpool getting the VAR calls in these finals.
Look at the Carling cup. Couple of red cards etc.
It's like they always get the benefit of the doubt
Been a weird game. Ancelotti has given us more of a game with Napoli and fecking Everton than he's done with real so far.
Our wing play has been poor. Diaz and Salah been very ineffective.
hahaha have you been on the stella’s all day or something? even my 80 year old nan can see fabinho clearly touches it last
The ref didn't give it, VAR did.
You're offside if there are not two players between you and the goal (those 2 players don't have to include the goalkeeper);
The decision is that when Valverde touched the ball, it hit Fabinho and went to Benzema who was offside.
The only debate is whether Fabinho deliberately gave the ball to Benzema, if involuntary then Benzema's offside.
But Liverpool are lucky.
Think he is still in shock after his beloved Northampton Town blew promotion on the last day of the season.I can’t believe he said that shite with a straight face. Talking straight out of his bunghole
Konate deliberately plays the ball and he does. It doesn’t have to be a pass ffs, just deliberately playing it.Let me say it again for all the blind folk on the caf.
Valverde touches the ball, ergo its a block, not a pass.
Ergo, not a goal.
The rule is fine.
Its all you blind folk that's the problem.
Such a dumb comment. They deserve it because they've just scored a clear goal that was disallowed. Nothing else matters.
Think he is still in shock after his beloved Northampton Town blew promotion on the last day of the season.
Soft penalty for handball in the 2019 final v Spurs, too. Insane to give a penalty for that mere minutes into a huge game.
Only if it's "intentional"
In the Guardiola era it’s all about time of possession and Xg. Goals are pesky afterthoughts best left for casual fansNot at all. Real Madrid deserves to be up a goal, because THEY SCORED A GOAL. That's how football works.
Inhalers please. Klopp is a civilised manSecond dose of pills has been given at half time
Valverde hit it first......unfortunatelyIt was onside, played off the Liverpool player. Of course when Liverpool go on to win this game that decision will be forgotten about..
Peter Walton is full of shit. The ball clearly came off Fabinho from a deliberate tackle that he made in an attempt to nick the ball off Valverde, which he was successful in.As Peter Walton explained, as the ball was deflected and not passed by a Liverpool player, the goal is offside.
Konate deliberately plays the ball and he does. It doesn’t have to be a pass ffs, just deliberately playing it.
VVD Mis hits a header and it falls to an offside Benzema , Benzema is not offside
Have some faith, Real are absolute masters at thisI'm getting a sick feeling again, Liverpool are winning this.
Yeah which leads to inconsistencyDon’t refs have to read intent quite a lot?
it literally is quite simple. it doesn’t matter that valverde touched it, it comes off 2 liverpool players after that. it’s a goal.Yes. But Valverde touches it before.
What are you not getting?
Valverde touches it. Ergo Fabinho BLOCKS IT, not passes it.
It's quite simple actually.
I'm sure Peter Walton said it was the correct decision.Not being deliberate is stupid when Valverde's intention was to shot, and not pass it to Benzema either.
I am.pretty sure there was similar goal for Liverpool just few weeks/months back in the PL and they told us it was a goal because of the same rules.
I think it should be a goal but according to the rules it isn't
No, when I heard it live I nearly spat my drink out. In what world would someone intentionally pass it to an opposition striker in their own box? Maybe he means passing it to a team mate but it's intercepted? Stupid rule either way.Have ever heard anything so ridiculous in your years watching the game?
It's mental.