Stan Jefferson
Full Member
That’s one of the worst decisions I’ve ever seen. Fabinho slides in to make the tackle therefore is deliberately trying to play the ball.
He slid in to block the ball. If it's not a deflection what is it? The ball came off Fabinho's sliding knee.It's not a deflection ffs
I hope everyone agrees that Real Madrid doesn't deserve to be up a goal. They got dominated.
Such a dumb comment. They deserve it because they've just scored a clear goal that was disallowed. Nothing else matters.I hope everyone agrees that Real Madrid doesn't deserve to be up a goal. They got dominated.
That means absolutely zilch.I hope everyone agrees that Real Madrid doesn't deserve to be up a goal. They got dominated.
That's a reward for her tbh.@Random Task if Liverpool win this, your wife is cut off from your services for a year!
Is Philip Walton on crack?
If the ball is played into the goalscorer's path by an opposition player, it's onside whether it was accidental or otherwise. The rule has always been that way, right?
I agree but I thought there was a double deflection. Surely that should play some part. I mean at what point does bad defending get punished? If Fabinho isn’t there the ball probably falls to a real player at the far post. not just because it’s Liverpool but I wish the attacking team would get advantage in decisions like this. It seems now they’re always looking to rule out goalsThink the whole deflection thing makes perfect sense. Otherwise players could just stand in an offside position and hope for a deflection and then go on and score.
That being said, I'd have much preferred the goal to stand. I don't want Liverpool to win any more than they already have done this season.
Seems like Real are just trying to stay in the game at times rather than take the fight to Liverpool. Am hoping it's part of the plan to change things up with the subs and nick it against a tired LiverpoolI hope everyone agrees that Real Madrid doesn't deserve to be up a goal. They got dominated.
The ref didn't give it, VAR did.
You're offside if there are not two players between you and the goal (those 2 players don't have to include the goalkeeper);
The decision is that when Valverde touched the ball, it hit Fabinho and went to Benzema who was offside.
The only debate is whether Fabinho deliberately gave the ball to Benzema, if involuntary then Benzema's offside.
But Liverpool are lucky.
hahaha have you been on the stella’s all day or something? even my 80 year old nan can see fabinho clearly touches it lastLet me say it again for all the blind folk on the caf.
Valverde touches the ball, ergo its a block, not a pass.
Ergo, not a goal.
The rule is fine.
Its all you blind folk that's the problem.
He said he doesn't deliberately pass it to Benzema which is an arse backwards sentence in itself anyway.The annoying part about this is Peter Walton. He’s wrong.
He’s saying Fabinho’s touch was not deliberate which leaves it open to interpretation and corruption.
In what planet is a slide tackle tackle not a deliberate act unless you’re on ice or a wet pitch?
Yeah I’m not actually sure why it wasn’t given now, don’t understand the not deliberate thing and the Valverde pass wasn’t for him.But the pass wasn’t meant for Benzema hence the crazy deflections. I still can’t believe this, a defender slides in , wins the ball and it’s not deliberate.
The whole things is a mess. The worst part isn’t Fabinho but the Liverpool player who gets in the first deflection, there’s no argument he isn’t trying to play the ball most of all.
https://streamff.com/v/bf25f7
0:32. Konate tackles the ball onto Fabinho
Go to specsavers in the morning sunshine
The ball goes precisely in the direction that Fabinho INTENDS to play the fecking ball. feck me what a robbery.
But it has to be according to rules. It was a clear offside according to rules. I actually dislike the rule.Not at all. Real Madrid deserves to be up a goal, because THEY SCORED A GOAL. That's how football works.
"We can tie ourselves up in knots talking about the only goal that was scored in the game, but let's talk about how great Liverpool are instead" Cnuts on BT
deliberate never ever gets used for this exact reason. how can you ever know? should drogbas goal where gerrard back passed it not have counted then either? gerrard didn’t mean it? it’s ludicrousWhen does it stop being not deliberate? It's just all too confusing.
Don’t refs have to read intent quite a lot?So the ref has to read the players mind and decide whether or not he meant it?
Why would he tho? I don't get the whole accidental/deliberate debate. He slid in for the ball and the ball hit him, then it went to Benzema who scored.
Genuinely asking why is there even a debate? It's a goal.
My BT contract runs out in November. I have been thinking about cancelling it. They are doing their best to make my mind up for me."We can tie ourselves up in knots talking about the only goal that was scored in the game, but let's talk about how great Liverpool are instead" Cnuts on BT
That means absolutely zilch.
The winner is the team that puts one more ball than their opponent in the net.