It strikes me, in reading
Michelle Goldberg's grappling with the disparity between Al Franken's public feminism and his private predation, and her impulse (albeit ambivalent) to allow the first to be weighed against the second, that this is a version of a much larger problem that transcends sexual harassment. Think of those liberal university presidents who inveigh against poverty and racism while paying their workers of color poverty-level wages. Think of that Daily Show correspondent, who's married to Samantha Bee, leading a fight against rezoning (and thereby desegregating) his kids' local public school. Hypocrisy is too pat and easy a charge here, too moralistic a frame. The real issue is what I call, in The Reactionary Mind, "the private life of power," and it's something that conservatives have often understood better than liberals. Feminists traditionally have understood it, too: "Here is the secret of the opposition to woman's equality in the state," wrote Elizabeth Cady Stanton. "Men are not ready to recognize it in the home." You can't separate the public stance from the private practice, not just in matters of gender, but also in matters of race and class. The private life of power is the Achilles' heel of all social transformation; it's where the right always sees its opportunity because it understands, as I write in the book, that "every great political blast...is set off by a private fuse....Behind the riot in the street or debate in Parliament is the maid talking back to her mistress, the worker disobeying her boss." I'm not weighing in here on whether Franken should resign or not. I only want to register this: separating public position from private practice, as many defenders of Franken are now doing, has long-term consequences. Not for political morality or virtue politics but for the distribution of power: at its best, the left has always understood that the path to emancipation lies through what is conventionally considered the non-political sphere. There's no way around it. The left in the broad sense (that is, the sense that includes liberalism) is made far more vulnerable by the attempt to bypass the private life of power than it is by the loss of an ally in parliament.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/opinion/harassment-allis-franken.html