ManUtd1999
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2013
- Messages
- 4,846
Hurricane Harvey.What the everlasting feck is going on.
A colleague likened the atmosphere to McCarthyism.
Everyone who did something wrong will likely be exposed in the weeks ahead.
Hurricane Harvey.What the everlasting feck is going on.
A colleague likened the atmosphere to McCarthyism.
Already shot the whole season, I don't see them shelving that completely, they might minimise Tambor's role from it though.
"All of us, including me, are coming to a newer and deeper recognition of the pain caused by conduct in the past, and have come to a profound new respect for women and their lives"
What horseshit. Most people already know how not to sexually harass people. Groping women isn't a "we can all learn a lesson here" problem, it's a "I'm a scumbag who doesn't know how to behave around women" problem.
"All of us, including me, are coming to a newer and deeper recognition of the pain caused by conduct in the past, and have come to a profound new respect for women and their lives"
What horseshit. Most people already know how not to sexually harass people. Groping women isn't a "we can all learn a lesson here" problem, it's a "I'm a scumbag who doesn't know how to behave around women" problem.
jesus...
charlie rose is who I feel personally disappointed at given i've watched his show for years and one of my favorite broadcasters.
"nobody respects women more than me"
Yeah I too wish all these accusers would stop speaking up.What the everlasting feck is going on.
A colleague likened the atmosphere to McCarthyism.
What the everlasting feck is going on.
A colleague likened the atmosphere to McCarthyism.
Nah, there seems to be 2 strands to this, one where real actual sexual abuse, harrasment, actually took place, and another where clumsy / inappropriate / desperate and unwelcome sexual approaches were made.your colleague is a moron
Yeah I too wish all these accusers would stop speaking up.
your colleague is a moron
Could you name some people who only falls into this category, just curious.Nah, there seems to be 2 strands to this, one where real actual sexual abuse, harrasment, actually took place, and another where clumsy / inappropriate / desperate and unwelcome sexual approaches were made.
Its one thing to make a pass and have it thrown back in your face, its quite another to pursue someone who has made it clear they're not interested, or to threaten someone's livelihood unless they watch you jerk off.
Nah, there seems to be 2 strands to this, one where real actual sexual abuse, harrasment, actually took place, and another where clumsy / inappropriate / desperate and unwelcome sexual approaches were made.
Its one thing to make a pass and have it thrown back in your face, its quite another to pursue someone who has made it clear they're not interested, or to threaten someone's livelihood unless they watch you jerk off.
What the everlasting feck is going on.
A colleague likened the atmosphere to McCarthyism.
Could you name some people who only falls into this category, just curious.
Literally every incident has been reported seems to fall in the actual sexual abuse/harassment category.
That wouldn't be harassment though would it? Harassment implies, you know, being harassed."I only grabbed one tit, your honour"
Can it be harassment if it happens only once? Genuine question. If he'd done it again the day after then it'd be different.
Well said. The nauseating hypocrisy of these guys compounds the original offence:
Weinstein: 'I so respect women'
Franken: 'I respect women. I don't respect men who don't.'
That'd be assault."I only grabbed one tit, your honour"
Franken is at 2/3 now.Weinstein - Accused by 80 different women of sexual harrassment, sexual assault and rape.
Franken - Accused by one woman (who just happens to be a hard right conservative with a book coming out) of pretending to grope her tits (without actually touching her) and sticking his tongue in her mouth during a rehearsal kiss. He says he doesn't remember events this way, and has called for an ethics investigation.
I see why you put them together, as they're clearly exactly the same..
"Lightens up the workday, your honour, these prissy women have no sense of humour"That'd be assault.
A better question would be "I pretended to grab one tit your honour, but didn't actually grab a tit at all."
"All of us, including me, are coming to a newer and deeper recognition of the pain caused by conduct in the past, and have come to a profound new respect for women and their lives"
What horseshit. Most people already know how not to sexually harass people. Groping women isn't a "we can all learn a lesson here" problem, it's a "I'm a scumbag who doesn't know how to behave around women" problem.
Horrible post.
The "but they're not raping like x" is a pointless argument. No one is grouping the men because they committed the same crime, but because they were outed as part of the same movement. We don't need to say that rape is worse than groping, because we all already know that rape is worse than groping.The second allegation has been denied by the woman in question itself, saying it is part of a skit.
My while take on the current atmosphere is that this is a result of a media cycle persistently following sexual harassment stories. There has definitely been an epidemic in western countries of old men in powerful positions taking advantage of women. It has always been brushed under the carpet and that's why you see this ridiculous old dinosaur defence being trotted out. It is important to create an atmosphere where a powerful man would think twice before harassing someone since now the harassed person has the avenues to report the matter and be taken seriously.
But, like I have said before, in my personal opinion listing all the accusers in same umbrella is also not correct. Allegations against Affleck and Wiener for example are much much less severe than against Spacey. Similarly whilst Louie CK also crossed a line and should have been reprimanded much earlier, it is not quite as worse as Weinstein. Then you have some people like Piven still maintaining their innocence. Now, even though one may be inclined to believe the women who accessed him, one can not be cent percent sure that Piven is lying. Lynch first, ask questions later can not be an approach for all the cases here.
The second allegation has been denied by the woman in question itself, saying it is part of a skit.
My while take on the current atmosphere is that this is a result of a media cycle persistently following sexual harassment stories. There has definitely been an epidemic in western countries of old men in powerful positions taking advantage of women. It has always been brushed under the carpet and that's why you see this ridiculous old dinosaur defence being trotted out. It is important to create an atmosphere where a powerful man would think twice before harassing someone since now the harassed person has the avenues to report the matter and be taken seriously.
But, like I have said before, in my personal opinion listing all the accusers in same umbrella is also not correct. Allegations against Affleck and Wiener for example are much much less severe than against Spacey. Similarly whilst Louie CK also crossed a line and should have been reprimanded much earlier, it is not quite as worse as Weinstein. Then you have some people like Piven still maintaining their innocence. Now, even though one may be inclined to believe the women who accessed him, one can not be cent percent sure that Piven is lying. Lynch first, ask questions later can not be an approach for all the cases here.
The "but they're not raping like x" is a pointless argument. No one is grouping the men because they committed the same crime, but because they were outed as part of the same movement. We don't need to say that rape is worse than groping, because we all already know that rape is worse than groping.
I’m certainly glad that we, as a society, are taking sexual harassment and assault more seriously.
What concerns me now is the news media’s approach to convicting the accused without a trial or even a legal charge, especially when allegations are about events from 10 or 20 years ago. Of course these charges must be reported, but news stories and editorials also convict the accused.
How is this different from the McCarthy communist-scare era, when the accused were ruined without real evidence or trials?