gaffs
Full Member
He has played a few poor games and been unlucky with the sending off's.
He will start v Villa.
He will start v Villa.
When Keane and Cantona captained us, kicking the opposition and getting sent off was a must!
In all seriousness, Bruno is the best candidate for captain, which says more about us than it does him.
Eriksen, Maguire, Casemiro ,Onana ,DalotWho should be Captain then? Luke Shaw?
This may be an unpopular opinion but I think that going down in pain grabbing your face and/or head when no contact is made should be a straight red card .
And be shit again.He has played a few poor games and been unlucky with the sending off's.
He will start v Villa.
- Eriksen wanted outEriksen, Maguire, Casemiro ,Onana ,Dalot
In that order, all preferable to Bruno as captain.
Not a huge fan of Casemiro but he's not a petulant twat
You all look tried? 6 weeks holidays not enough for you? Plus Easter, Christmas and what not? Pffft.The body language is a no. I work at senior level in a school, every morning we have a meeting and my head finishes by saying something along the lines of ‘we all look tired go put your best smile on and give everyone a lift.’
Does Bruno do that? Does he lead? Does he want it enough? He’s a great player but he needs to be dropped.
No he is not. Absolure shit captain without a spine or leadership qualitiesAgree. He is far from an ideal choice, but he is the best of a bad bunch.
Looks like a proper midfield again.Our midfield looks solid without him running around wherever he feels like.
Our midfield looks solid without him running around wherever he feels like.
True but we don't have good players at doing it, though in the final 3rd looking better.I wouldn't say it looks solid, it doesn't look better or worse to me which I think says a lot about Bruno's impact on the team. We are still struggling to dominate the midfield though. We have still given up opportunitiws, still transitioned well, still struggled to maintain possession. So more of the same really.
No it did notLooks like a proper midfield again.
We looked much better against Brentford.True but we don't have good players at doing it, though in the final 3rd looking better.
Brentford are a worse team though.We looked much better against Brentford.
Are they?Brentford are a worse team though.
Yes I think thats very clear from watching the 2 teams play, Brentford look quite a bit worse.Are they?
But only for the 2nd half. Lets face it, we've seen the exact game we've seen tonight with or without Bruno. No difference here. We might have seen a few more balls over the top with him. We might have seen a few more dangerous transitions against us. Who knows, don't think we missed him tonight.We looked much better against Brentford.
But only for the 2nd half. Lets face it, we've seen the exact game we've seen tonight with or without Bruno. No difference here. We might have seen a few more balls over the top with him. We might have seen a few more dangerous transitions against us. Who knows, don't think we missed him tonight.
Yes I think thats very clear from watching the 2 teams play, Brentford look quite a bit worse.
So structured. So much control. Brimming with creativity.Our midfield looks solid without him running around wherever he feels like.
We missed his assist tonight, like the 2-1 goal against Brentford.But only for the 2nd half. Lets face it, we've seen the exact game we've seen tonight with or without Bruno. No difference here. We might have seen a few more balls over the top with him. We might have seen a few more dangerous transitions against us. Who knows, don't think we missed him tonight.
Our midfield looks solid without him running around wherever he feels like.
Definitely. I mean, it doesn't come close to the incinerating attacking play we are usually known for, especially in the last few years but it was a step in the right direction. Glad you finally seem to get the corner.So structured. So much control. Brimming with creativity.
The good old build-in assists.We missed his assist tonight, like the 2-1 goal against Brentford.
You thought yesterday was a controlled performance that was brimming with creativity? I know you have a posting history of trying to act like the smartest guy in the room, but I'd be intrigued to see you explain how having less possession than Fenerbache represents 'control'. Or if you could name more than 3 good chances we created in a game that, in your own words, was 'definitely' brimming with creativity.Definitely. I mean, it doesn't come close to the incinerating attacking play we are usually known for, especially in the last few years but it was a step in the right direction. Glad you finally seem to get the corner.
I'd ask why you think I try to act like the smartest guy in the room but when you didn't notice the irony I used to answer on your ironic post, then I guess I can save myself the effort.You thought yesterday was a controlled performance that was brimming with creativity? I know you have a posting history of trying to act like the smartest guy in the room, but I'd be intrigued to see you explain how having less possession than Fenerbache represents 'control'. Or if you could name more than 3 good chances we created in a game that, in your own words, was 'definitely' brimming with creativity.
I noticed the intended irony in the middle part of your post, however you still think yesterday was a step in the right direction, no? Or was the entirety of your post meant to be ironic? In which case, you agree that we still lacked control without Bruno. Either way, it's clear that you haven't quite mastered irony or sarcasm in the way you think you have.I'd ask why you think I try to act like the smartest guy in the room but when you didn't notice the irony I used to answer on your ironic post, then I guess I can save myself the effort.
One match isn't a step. Also he wasn't left out for footballing or style reasons but for a red card - not a step. The whole thing was irony. And while I certainly would say, that I would find it very odd to use yesterdays performance as some sort of proof against him, it is also quite odd to use it for him. Which I thought was a bit of the background music of your post. We have played similar matches like yesterday with Bruno in the team plus it is hard to imagine that the overall would have looked too differently with him in the side. A few more balls in behind most likely.I noticed the intended irony in the middle part of your post, however you still think yesterday was a step in the right direction, no? Or was the entirety of your post meant to be ironic? In which case, you agree that we still lacked control without Bruno. Either way, it's clear that you haven't quite mastered irony or sarcasm in the way you think you have.