Cnaiür urs Skiötha
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2013
- Messages
- 3,071
Is there a chance that we use any of our young starlets sending out on loan as makeweight? Someone like Chong could do pretty well in the Portugues league.
Don’t think Sporting would want anyone on loan unless they can make an immediate impact like Nani a few seasons ago.Is there a chance that we use any of our young starlets sending out on loan as makeweight? Someone like Chong could do pretty well in the Portugues league.
Not quite.
As far as I understand it, the board are currently preparing to make preparations for the preparations of a new bid.
It's a process.
He's undoubtedly a decent player, but I just don't think it would've worked both in the premier league and with our players/system.
Ole's comments today pretty much confirm our summer transfer spending is over. Unless something dramatic happens like Lukaku/ Pogba leaving, or Sporting/ Leicester drop their asking prices dramatically - neither of which I can see happening.
Maybe Woody thinks we have enough quality to make the top 4 anyway or what I think is that he doesn't care as long as the club is making money.What a disaster of a summer that will have been. So much for a “rebuild”.
Maybe Woody thinks we have enough quality to make the top 4 anyway or what I think is that he doesn't care as long as the club is making money.
Woodward is an investment banker. For a banker, the one (and ONLY) important thing are KPIs for bonus payments.
Apparently, Woodward’s personal bonuses are not related to Man Utd results, but rather to other factors.
Don't know anything about banking. Just read about KPI and still couldn't understand it properly. What I get from your point in bold is what makes me see why Woodward is not bothered by results. He is just happy making the Glazer's money as long as he keeps his job, which I am sure he is paid healthily for, without me knowing exactly what he is paid. Can you explain how the KPI works please?Woodward is an investment banker. For a banker, the one (and ONLY) important thing are KPIs for bonus payments.
Apparently, Woodward’s personal bonuses are not related to Man Utd results, but rather to other factors.
Don't know anything about banking. Just read about KPI and still couldn't understand it properly. What I get from your point in bold is what makes me see why Woodward is not bothered by results. He is just happy making the Glazer's money as long as he keeps his job, which I am sure he is paid healthily for, without me knowing exactly what he is paid. Can you explain how the KPI works please?
What a disaster of a summer that will have been. So much for a “rebuild”.
Maybe Woody thinks we have enough quality to make the top 4 anyway or what I think is that he doesn't care as long as the club is making money.
The problem with us distancing from Fernandes would be that who the feck are we working on then? Just Longstaff? That's it? That's our planned midfield enforcement? We haven't been firmly linked with anyone else.
Is the plan to just rely on Mctominay, Pereira and Fred and hope one of them just magically significantly improves? We will already be rolling the dice on the RW situation, doing the same in midfield is just absurd.
Thank you very much for explaining thisWell, KPI are set for individuals/divisions as certain goals to reach in a certain time period. If KPIs are reached, pre-agreed bonuses may be paid, if not - no bonus (or some formulae to calculate the bonus based on percent of KPI completion).
For example, “increase revenue by 10%”, “reach 20% EBITDA margin”, “increase net cash flow by 50m”, “sign 5 new sponsorship deals”, “win the league”, “win FA cup”, etc.
Surely we would be buying them because we want to improve the squad. Now I'm not convinced by either Maguire or Fernandes and they would both obviously be a bit of a gamble, because every signing is, but surely they're a lot less of a gamble than trusting the likes of Mctominay, Fred and Pereira will massively improve this season, what with them being already proven, to an extent, on a high level for a full season.What's the point of buying players just for the sake of buying them ?
It's nonsense to overspend on players just because they might be slightly better than what we have .
You spend big money on players that you know will make a big difference and that's not Maguire or Fernandes
I fully understand the point in bold, as I've seen the quote myself.You guys dont get it, Ed said that we do not need to win to be commercially viable and the Glazers care about one thing...making themselves money. If we win a title thats a plus but the first order of business is for them to get paid.
When we stop making so much money, they will sell the club for a massive profit and be laughing all the way to the bank.
doesn't make sense that we haven't signed him - this isnt one that would be hard to get over the line - suggests he isnt on Ole's list
It makes perfect sense that we haven’t signed him - maybe OGS doesn’t want HIM in particular.
But what makes no sense is that we signed no one at all in midfield - this is simply disgraceful for the fans and manager considering midfield “performance” last year and departure of Herrera
I think this is a common issue a lot of fans have. Just because a player is from a weaker league a player gets overhyped due to good performances or underhyped as he is "playing in a weaker league"
The reality is we have to trust the scouts opinions on whether Bruno is good enough and can adapt to the premier league.
It's never a certainty when you sign new players from foreign leagues but there are plenty of examples of players who made it from Portugal (Bernardo Silva, Ricardo Carvalho, Ronaldo, Nani etc) just as there are examples of players who didn't live up to the hype.
It's definitely not fair to say he will most likely be like Fred (who in my opinion we should judge on this season rather than last) but as with any transfer there is risk involved. We just need to calculate whether the fees and wages make it worth taking the risk
He is been presented here as a messiah, like he can come and replace Pogba ( who is one of the best midfielders in the world currently ).
Bernardo Silva had a very mediocre first year if I remember correctly, this year we need only players that can go to the first eleven and Bruno is never that player, maybe next year when we can integrate him.
And if we are to take a big risk, I prefer to take it with Gomes who looks very exciting.
What people fail to comprehend is that our profitability is intrinsically linked to how successful the club is. Whether directly or indirectly, they will most definitely be related to results.Woodward is an investment banker. For a banker, the one (and ONLY) important thing are KPIs for bonus payments.
Apparently, Woodward’s personal bonuses are not related to Man Utd results, but rather to other factors.
I was told on here in previous summers that the likes of Depay (lots of goals in a weak league), Darmian, Mkhitaryan, Fred, Dalot, Lindelof would all walk into our starting 11, none of them did.You must rate Bruno very, very low if you think he can't make it to our first eleven. He is not a Pogba type of player but this idea that he's a Pogba replacement or that the two can't play together has been repeated to exhaustion and it's just not true.
This guy would walk into our first eleven.
What people fail to comprehend is that our profitability is intrinsically linked to how successful the club is. Whether directly or indirectly, they will most definitely be related to results.
“This means that by winning the champions league, a club can earn €82,450,000 of prize money under this structure, not counting shares of the qualifying rounds, play-off round or the market pool.”Woodward: "Playing performance doesn't really have a meaningful impact on what we can do on the commercial side of the business."
The one quote that made me rely dislike Woody.Woodward: "Playing performance doesn't really have a meaningful impact on what we can do on the commercial side of the business."
Bruno Fernandes and Maguire will make a massive difference for us.What's the point of buying players just for the sake of buying them ?
It's nonsense to overspend on players just because they might be slightly better than what we have .
You spend big money on players that you know will make a big difference and that's not Maguire or Fernandes
I agree but Leicester said they want time to buy a replacement. So if we do sign him we need to do it soon.Bruno Fernandes and Maguire will make a massive difference for us.
Woodward is an investment banker. For a banker, the one (and ONLY) important thing are KPIs for bonus payments.
Apparently, Woodward’s personal bonuses are not related to Man Utd results, but rather to other factors.
Woodward arranged the glazer takeover, saddling the club with hundreds of millions in debt. His priority isn't the clubs success, it's ensuring the steady stream of cash to himself and our parasitic owners.How many ex-footballers, coaches and scouts do you see running top football clubs? ‘Woodward is just a banker’. Just as well we got one of those to run a multi-billion dollar company then. He hired an ex-footballer to manage the football team.
“This means that by winning the champions league, a club can earn €82,450,000 of prize money under this structure, not counting shares of the qualifying rounds, play-off round or the market pool.”
But the cafe thinks Woodward, a man who they accuse of only caring about profit, doesn’t care about that €100m+ revenue stream though. Makes sense.
I'd be very surprised if we're after anyone but Maguire at this stage.Bruno Fernandes and Maguire will make a massive difference for us.