The sport witness article that you posted is nothing but an article that try to make Ed or our club looks like the bad one here, the same goes to other article beside sport witness who also made an article to criticised Ed & Glazer for purpose to sell their story to viewers. I’m not defending them, I’m trying to tell you that Sporting also has good reasons to rise their price and not everything is Ed’s fault. What do we feckin know?
Your article has zero quote from the Sporting perspective that indicates what Sporting wants is 70m euro right now. The only quote in that article is that Sporting would accept 65m-70m euro last summer and if the 20m euro bonus from Spurs was reasonable, they would accept it.
However, that doesn’t mean Sporting can’t increase their price to 80m euro. Clubs tend to do this for many factors. One is because the transfer happens in January which the fees could get more expensive and another factor is to push the buyer to rise their offer to get closed to that 70m Euro. It’s common.