Spoony said:
He's got the best average and the best strike rate.
He's got the best average and the best strike rate.
Viv Richards: 1974-1991
Sunil Gavaskar: 1971-1987
How do they belong to " different generation" ?
Sunil Gavaskar: 1971-1987
How do they belong to " different generation" ?
Slabber said:
Chappels, Gavaskar, Kapil Dev, Imran, Miandad all rate Holding as a tougher bowler to face than Marshall.
Simple
Holding > Marshall
vijay said:
I disagree.
crappycraperson said:
I've given you the explanation. its for you to decide.
vijay said:
By the same token almost all the prominent players today have been quoted as saying Sachin is better than Lara.
But you claim otherwise. Eh?
It doesnt matter if Sunny peaked early and Viv later. They belonged to same era like Sachin and Lara.vijay said:
You should accept that you are clueless and save yourself from further embarassment.
Slabber said:
why?
Holding had more variety than Marshall.
Marshall depended a lot on his pace and once he lost his pace he did struggle. Like all other West Indian quickies , he didnt depend on the wickets to generate pace but Gavaskar and Kapil sorted him out on the flat pitches in India. Wickets might say other wise but Holding was tough to handle any where in the world.
crappycraperson said:
I am feck bothered about your cut and paste arguments.
Slabber said:
No. Waqar's got the best strike rate.
And for once I agree with Vij, I think Holding was better.
Spoony said:
We agree with a lot of other things except for your unknown antagonism towards the Indians.
vijay said:
I have nothing against the nappy wearing lot.
Great bunch to wind up. Always take the bait.
You don't realise how much fun we have. Cyberly speaking of course.
Spoony said:
Good point
Spoony said:
Bad point
Spoony said:
Cheers Spoony....
But abuse dosent make a discussion more enjoyable.
Slabber said:
Can't believe Marshall's dead. Been 6 years.
vijay said:
It does.
And it's not really abuse. It's just a bit of a laff. Even more funny when the other person thinks you're serious.
vijay said:
I disagree.
Slabber said:
I am not here to read your spastic one line thoughts thicko. Tell me why Marshall is better than Holding
vijay said:
Given his relative lack of height, his bowling ability was truly sensational. The best of all time and a joy to watch, I'd say. I don't care whether you think Holding was better.
Slabber said:
Robbie Keane has scored. Are you watching the match?
May because you are wrong?vijay said:
First of all you messed it up, by claiming you were listing best batsmen from their respective generation while listing both Sunny and Viv who belonged to same era.
Then made idiotic hyperbolic statements like Lara is head and shoulders above any other from his era.
There after to show that Holding > Marshall, used testimony by other cricketers who played against them. That parameter would effectively nullify you claim that Lara is better than Sachin, given the fact almost every prominent cricketer like Warne, waugh, Akram have gone on record to say he is better than Lara.
Again I advise to accept your shortcoming and avoid futher embarrassment
Slabber said:
Marshall was a great bowler but why are you relating height with pace?
Garner and Bruce Reid were taller? Are they the fastest?
Clarke was only as tall as Marshall but he wasn't slow either.
crappycraperson said:
I again suggest you to look in to your career rather than wasting your time and dad's money on the internet.
You have proven once again that you are clueless idiot with shite opnions.vijay said:
crappycraperson said:
I again suggest you to look in to your career rather than wasting your time and dad's money on the internet. .
You have proven once again that you are clueless idiot with shite opnions uncapable of making a coherent argument.
And you might as well change that "dad's" part to "mom's".
And you might as well change that "dad's" part to "mom's".
crappycraperson said:
I again suggest you to look in to your career rather than wasting your time and dad's money on the internet. .
You have proven once again that you are clueless idiot with shite opinions uncapable of making a coherent argument.
vijay said:
I'm listening to it on the radio. 2-1. 90 seconds to go.
crappycraperson said:
I again suggest you to look in to your career rather than wasting your time and dad's money on the internet. .
You really are an idiot Vijay.
Dubai_Devil said:
I dont need to prove my brilliancy in an internet forum.
vijay said:
You do. Everyone thinks you're a complete waste of space. Everyone.
You have proven once again that you are a clueless idiot with shite opinions uncapable of making a coherent argument as verified by other posters as well.vijay said:
I will post it once again:
First of all you messed it up, by claiming you were listing best batsmen from their respective generation while listing both Sunny and Viv who belonged to same era.
Then made idiotic hyperbolic statements like Lara is head and shoulders above any other from his era.
There after to show that Holding > Marshall, used testimony by other cricketers who played against them. That parameter would effectively nullify you claim that Lara is better than Sachin, given the fact almost every prominent cricketer like Warne, waugh, Akram have gone on record to say he is better than Lara.
Again I advise to accept your shortcomings and avoid futher embarrassment.
sincher said:
To be fair, he does know a bit about computers.
vijay said:
But you do go out of your way to prove your idiocy
Thats exactly what I was going to post.Dubai_Devil said:
Slabber said:
Not as much as me, I bet. Which makes him redundant, because you can all come to me with any problems you might have*.
* I'll ignore them, as I can't be arsed. Just to be clear on that.
crappycraperson said:
You havent watched the cricket in the 80's so its better to listen than resorting to cut and paste arguments. Read Post No 158 ...If you can really read and understand
Also Lara is better than Tendulkar.
Dubai_Devil said:
Tell me where I was idiotic, so that I can correct myself.