Brentan Rodgers

Status
Not open for further replies.
In fairness to Liverpool and Rodgers, if the could have replaced the quality of suarez with the same quality, or added another player of that quality and kept Suarez, things would be very different for them this year. He was a huge loss to a team that only really had 1 other world class player in Gerrard. This year has taken its toll on Gerrard and Liverpool are suffering massively from losing two key players. But I have no doubt that Rodgers is a good manager. If he was in charge of a club that had quality throughout the squad his brand of football would be devastating. High pressure and fast counter attacking held together by a will to keep ball, if he was at City or Chelsea or United he would win trophies. Unfortunately for him hes at Liverpool and they dont have any real proven quality. A couple of potentials but no one that is going to lift them out of being a Europa league team. Plus their owners arent going to back them massively in the transfer window.

So if we managed to keep Ronaldo...... Football doesn't work like this and on a side note he should have bought far better than Lambert and Ballotelli in all honesty!
 
Observers of football tend to be very short-sighted and I think that's what Rodgers was saying. The real measure of someone's talent, whether players or managers, is longevity. Anyone can have a great game or a great month, even a great season, but the top players and managers do it every season. He was helped enormously by having Suarez last season: the man single-handedly ran teams ragged and scored a hatful. Add to that, Sterling burst on the scene, Coutinho, Henderson and Gerrard are freed up by Suarez's dominant performances, and you have yourself a potent attacking force that I don't see Rodgers as being that responsible for, tactically.

Take away Suarez this season and now your striker isn't defending from the front and harassing defences to death. Now teams can focus on Sterling a bit more, Coutinho and Henderson don't have the same passing options and are more easily contained, and Gerrard, without the Hollywood pass to the most willing runner in football, is shown up for the lethargic millstone that he is now. And what can Rodgers do about it? Nothing. Last season was their perfect storm and they are back to theirs and his levels.
 
I believe in the core principles he has and if he has the right players he can execute to devastating effect but these players dont come around often and that coupled with his inability to coach a defence and have a nailed down way of playing leaves me wondering. The summers going to be huge and I'm inclined to give him another season to see if he can replicate something resembling last season.
But surely he could get a coach in to help him defensively?
 
So if we managed to keep Ronaldo...... Football doesn't work like this and on a side note he should have bought far better than Lambert and Ballotelli in all honesty!

Who was there that would have joined them though? Balotelli was a punt signing, he did relatively well for Milan but he was always going to be either hit or miss, nothing in between. He's been terrible so far and I bet they'll be looking to offload in the Summer but for the price he was worth the gamble anyway in my opinion.

Sanchez turned them down, Cavani wouldn't have moved there, Falcao has been as terrible as Balotelli or even worse, there's a lack of British strikers who could improve them and the only two who are realistic targets and could do the job have only emerged this season (Berahino and Ings). They could have obviously scouted better but there was a distinct lack of good strikers moving last year.
 
There was lots of talk last night on twitter from Tony Evans etc about the 2014 summer transfers, and how Rodgers was given more say due to the impressive 2013/14 campaign. Rodgers was the one who identified Lallana, Lovren and Lambert.

I imagine this summer he'll have near enough no say in transfers after that mess.
 
There was lots of talk last night on twitter from Tony Evans etc about the 2014 summer transfers, and how Rodgers was given more say due to the impressive 2013/14 campaign. Rodgers was the one who identified Lallana, Lovren and Lambert.

I imagine this summer he'll have near enough no say in transfers after that mess.


Ah, the 3 'L's. Bit different to the 3 'S's...;)
 
and how Rodgers was given more say due to the impressive 2013/14 campaign. Rodgers was the one who identified Lallana, Lovren and Lambert..

Not excuse for that one no matter which way you look at it. The guy would look at home in The Championship. He is an old school British striker which doesn't reflect well on Rogers's mentality. Appalling that he was capped for England too, but yeah, Roy Hodgson.
 
But surely he could get a coach in to help him defensively?
Egos way to big for that, his comment when asked about our new found defensive solidity a month or so back was " that new defensive coach you've all been talking about" he does not realise how big of a hinderance it is and the only way we've negated it is in a 3-4-3 where we look relatively solid but even then its just a by product of a formation that allows us to have a stopper and a sweeper, get men back, mantain shape and gives each of our defenders smaller zones of the pitch to defend. Now that formation is on the back burner for now or at least untill we find two players who are comfortable playing wing-back ( Ibe could be one) and switch the diamond up front so we have Coutinho behind two strikers and therefore an actual goal threat. The only problem is the roles are quite defined, you take Skrtel out of the sweeper role and Lucas out the stopper role and we look confused and teams cut through us like butter. Then when you put Skrtel back in a four he is utter tripe.Skrtel Sakho Lovren Toure, these are all international defenders who have looked fine in other systems and under various different managers, they didnt all just join Liverpool and become decidedly average, it's a huge concern that needs to be rectified. Although having a couple in form strikers would probably gloss the issue over.
 
It's one thing having the (admirable) self-confidence to refuse to have a defensive coach or a DoF, quite another when one's track record doesn't really merit that self-confidence or sense of entitlement. Given how big a club Liverpool is, and how small in comparison Rodgers' achievements are, I'm amazed that FSG didn't tell him to - as we say in the business - bugger off.
 
Having been delighted by the impact made by the January arrivals of Daniel Sturridge and Philippe Coutinho, the boss admits he'll be aiming to recruit players who can make a similar impression on his team.

"It is quality we are after, not quantity," said Rodgers.

"There is no doubt there is a natural rebuilding that will come with the likes of Jamie Carragher retiring. I am happy with the squad if I can then put another three or four quality players to it.

Sure...
 
Apparently, according to journalist Tony Evans: 'Rodgers will no longer be given scope to identify his own targets (Lambert, Lallana, Lovren were sought by Rodgers)'. I know it's easy enough to point and laugh at some of Brendan's signings, but I don't care for this modern-ish trend of non-footballing people recruiting players over the head of the manager. A boss stands or falls by his success or failure, and a massive part of that is having his players to choose from. Any other way just seems unfair to me.
 
It's one thing having the (admirable) self-confidence to refuse to have a defensive coach or a DoF, quite another when one's track record doesn't really merit that self-confidence or sense of entitlement. Given how big a club Liverpool is, and how small in comparison Rodgers' achievements are, I'm amazed that FSG didn't tell him to - as we say in the business - bugger off.
It's also an admirable quality to recognise one's weaknesses and find ways to minimalise them whilst maximising there strengths. Ferguson did it for years as have many top managers, Rodgers needs to learn not everything he does has to be enacted by himself.
 
Apparently, according to journalist Tony Evans: 'Rodgers will no longer be given scope to identify his own targets (Lambert, Lallana, Lovren were sought by Rodgers)'. I know it's easy enough to point and laugh at some of Brendan's signings, but I don't care for this modern-ish trend of non-footballing people recruiting players over the head of the manager. A boss stands or falls by his success or failure, and a massive part of that is having his players to choose from. Any other way just seems unfair to me.
But when that man has a questionable eye for spotting a player surely it's best to let him focus on what he's best at (coaching) and let somebody else bring in his "type" of player. Regardless we need to committ to one or the other and it looks like we're going with a TC. Just as an example i heard somewhere yesterday that the TC was pushing for Firmino whereas Rodgers really wanted Lallana. I suspect he's now used up any goodwill last season bought him.
 
Apparently, according to journalist Tony Evans: 'Rodgers will no longer be given scope to identify his own targets (Lambert, Lallana, Lovren were sought by Rodgers)'. I know it's easy enough to point and laugh at some of Brendan's signings, but I don't care for this modern-ish trend of non-footballing people recruiting players over the head of the manager. A boss stands or falls by his success or failure, and a massive part of that is having his players to choose from. Any other way just seems unfair to me.

It's not Brendan's money that he can spend it on dross just because he is the boss. He has been given that opportunity and obviously not performed well. The owners have definitely lost trust in his judgment of players and that is quite understandable. As a club Liverpool cannot afford an outlay of 100m every summer.

If Brendan doesn't like this arrangement then he knows where the door is. Something tells me he is going to fall in line and blame the transfer committee the moment things stop working. If it does work out then obviously it is all due to him.
 
Yeah, fair points, both. I myself suspect that BR has a parochial approach to possible signings (i.e. he's most familiar with 'domestic' players, and concentrates on those rather than having a worldwide perspective.)
 
So if we managed to keep Ronaldo...... Football doesn't work like this and on a side note he should have bought far better than Lambert and Ballotelli in all honesty!

He made mistakes in the transfer market. That doesn't make him a bad manager. He took risks, I could name a few worse signings that we've seen at United over the years than Lambert and Balotelli.

Ronaldo and United don't compare. You're comparing a team that went to three champions league finals, won one and also won 3 out of 5 premierships, to a team that haven't won a trophy in god knows how long.
 
Who was there that would have joined them though? Balotelli was a punt signing, he did relatively well for Milan but he was always going to be either hit or miss, nothing in between. He's been terrible so far and I bet they'll be looking to offload in the Summer but for the price he was worth the gamble anyway in my opinion.

Sanchez turned them down, Cavani wouldn't have moved there, Falcao has been as terrible as Balotelli or even worse, there's a lack of British strikers who could improve them and the only two who are realistic targets and could do the job have only emerged this season (Berahino and Ings). They could have obviously scouted better but there was a distinct lack of good strikers moving last year.

I think you are wrong on many levels here buddy. It's not for me to say who to sign but Rodgers bought 2 strikers that are not the most mobile and he likes to play a pressing game! Surely that's enough to suggest they won't fit in?
 
Who was there that would have joined them though? Balotelli was a punt signing, he did relatively well for Milan but he was always going to be either hit or miss, nothing in between. He's been terrible so far and I bet they'll be looking to offload in the Summer but for the price he was worth the gamble anyway in my opinion.

Sanchez turned them down, Cavani wouldn't have moved there, Falcao has been as terrible as Balotelli or even worse, there's a lack of British strikers who could improve them and the only two who are realistic targets and could do the job have only emerged this season (Berahino and Ings). They could have obviously scouted better but there was a distinct lack of good strikers moving last year.

i would disagree with that. As poor as falcao has been its not for lack of trying. Balotelli is a detriment every aspect on/off the pitch
 
Egos way to big for that, his comment when asked about our new found defensive solidity a month or so back was " that new defensive coach you've all been talking about" he does not realise how big of a hinderance it is and the only way we've negated it is in a 3-4-3 where we look relatively solid but even then its just a by product of a formation that allows us to have a stopper and a sweeper, get men back, mantain shape and gives each of our defenders smaller zones of the pitch to defend. Now that formation is on the back burner for now or at least untill we find two players who are comfortable playing wing-back ( Ibe could be one) and switch the diamond up front so we have Coutinho behind two strikers and therefore an actual goal threat. The only problem is the roles are quite defined, you take Skrtel out of the sweeper role and Lucas out the stopper role and we look confused and teams cut through us like butter. Then when you put Skrtel back in a four he is utter tripe.Skrtel Sakho Lovren Toure, these are all international defenders who have looked fine in other systems and under various different managers, they didnt all just join Liverpool and become decidedly average, it's a huge concern that needs to be rectified. Although having a couple in form strikers would probably gloss the issue over.

Nothing to do with his ego. 'Defensive coaches' are a myth - they don't exist.
 
Nothing to do with his ego. 'Defensive coaches' are a myth - they don't exist.
Steve Clarke wasn't exactly awful for us defensively, I just can't think of other means to solve the issue, after three seasons I don't think Rodgers is going to do it by himself.
 
Steve Clarke wasn't exactly awful for us defensively, I just can't think of other means to solve the issue, after three seasons I don't think Rodgers is going to do it by himself.

Steve Clarke wasn't a defence coach - he was first team coach.

No PL team has a specially designated defensive coach. You coach the team as a whole, not just specifically the defence, midfield or attack.

Some managers like Ferguson/Dalglish opt to get coaches in to train the team for them i.e Meulensteen/Queiroz/Clarke, and they may focus more specifically on organisation/the defensive side of the game. Rodgers is very hands on and does the coaching himself alongside Colin Pascoe and Mike Marsh.
 
Steve Clarke wasn't a defence coach - he was first team coach.

No PL team has a specially designated defensive coach. You coach the team as a whole, not just specifically the defence, midfield or attack.

Some managers like Ferguson/Dalglish opt to get coaches in to train the team for them i.e Meulensteen/Queiroz/Clarke, and they may focus more specifically on organisation/the defensive side of the game. Rodgers is very hands on and does the coaching himself alongside Colin Pascoe and Mike Marsh.
Fair enough that's what I was getting at but you've put it more succinctly, still then we should try to employ a more defense orientated first team coach alongside our current triumvirate.
 
No PL team has a specially designated defensive coach. You coach the team as a whole, not just specifically the defence, midfield or attack.

Scott Marshall at Villa was a specified Defensive Coach until recently. It's not rare to have a coach who focuses on the defensive side of the game.
 
Rodgers will be delighted with the 74% possession, he'll be thinking West Brom have seen what his teams all about.
 
Rodgers will be delighted with the 74% possession, he'll be thinking West Brom have seen what his teams all about.


We created opportunities, our only downfall was taking those chances but that has been a problem over the course of the season. I thought the players were outstanding, their courage and play on the ball. Across the team there were some outstanding performances.
 
CDcvEoTVAAAqegi.jpg


An inspiring bunch.
 
Proud of ma team. The control, the passin', the movement. Just needed that wee bit of luck.

To be fair, it is difficult to score past WBA defending like they do, with literally no decent striker.
 
Those pictures don't look good from his perspective, like he knows something has already been decided on behind the scenes.
 
"It was outstanding. Everything was outstanding. My man management was outstanding."
 
Fair enough that's what I was getting at but you've put it more succinctly, still then we should try to employ a more defense orientated first team coach alongside our current triumvirate.

Don't think that'd work as a more defence minded coach would have different ideals on how to coach the game which would contradict Rodgers and co.

i.e perhaps he'd want to concentrate on controlling space rather than possession which is the opposite of Rodgers.

Scott Marshall at Villa was a specified Defensive Coach until recently. It's not rare to have a coach who focuses on the defensive side of the game.

He was also 'first team coach'.
 
I know this has been done literally a few pages back but I can't get enough so more lessons from his self mentoring "My biggest mentor is myself because I’ve had to study, so that’s been my biggest influence."

"Liverpool Football Club is the heartland of football folklore."

BBC reported this:

Liverpool v Basel: Brendan Rodgers tells players folklore beckons

Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers says his players could become legends if they beat Basel in their deciding group match of the Uefa Champions League.

His side need to beat the Swiss champions to go thorough to the knock-out stages of the competition.

And as for what he actually said in direct quotes - "This is a competition that has great history for Liverpool. It's an opportunity for these players to write themselves into folklore by winning the game and making sure we get into the next round."

"When you’ve got the ball 65-70% of the time, it’s a football death for the other team. We’re not at that stage yet, but that’s what we will get to. It’s death by football. You just suck the life out of them."

He did this today, good job Brentan.

"Liverpool are one of the dynasties of the game. They have won five European Cups and their status is up there with AC Milan, Inter Milan, Barcelona, Real Madrid and Bayern Munich."

"The Liverpool jersey has become heavy to wear and I want to change that."

"All I can say is that I am a people’s person"

Balotelli

"I believe a young player will run through a barbed wire fence for you. An older player looks for a hole in the fence."

Gerrard stamps his own hole and then slips through it.

"You train dogs, I like to educate players."

Maybe that's why you couldn't get the ball off the Trainer-coach.

"I’ve always said that you can live without water for many days, but you can’t live for a second without hope."

I see you're bursting with hope:

CDcucunWYAEB3x8.jpg:large


"If you give a bad player time, he can play. If you give a good player time, he can kill you."

If you give Stevie G time he'll feck your season up.

"It was a perfect away performance, apart from the first 10 minutes."

So it wasn't a perfect away performance you idiot.

"I want to use the incredible support to make coming to Anfield the longest 90 minutes of an opponent’s life."

The 'incredible support' looked embarrassed at Juanfield.

"All I'll ever do is all I've ever done in any job, and that's promise to fight for my life for the supporters and the people of the city."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.